General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#3 |
|
only women should be priests, and they should be forced to preach naked... first it would fill the churches again, than it would stop porn and turn everyone gay, thus ending overpopulation + resulting deforestation of the environment due to human overpopulation pressures...
the forests would grow back, consuming excess C02, saving the world from global warming, preventing war and famine... the world would go back to state of balance and long term prosperity of the humankind would be ensured... I agree with this thread title with a slight correction - Governments should not allow men to become Priests |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
That reminds me. I forgot to declare victory over this thread. If you think... "Yet Gay men are about seven times as likely to die from AIDS. By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it" is a victory, you really don't get it. You're the one "trying" to use the logic that health is a reason to ban something... The simple fact is, some things are less healthy than others... that's reality. So you using your health argument against gay marriage is simply silly and stupid. There is something called freedom of choice... we can drink, drive motorcycles, ski, sky dive, smoke, and so many other things that are less healthy, and the government doesn't stand in our way. So unless you come up with a real argument against gay marriages besides health... you are the loser. Enjoy... |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
If you think... "Yet Gay men are about seven times as likely to die from AIDS.
By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it" is a victory, you really don't get it. Umm, I don't know about you, but I'm quite enjoying this thread. ![]() You're the one "trying" to use the logic that health is a reason to ban something... The simple fact is, some things are less healthy than others... that's reality. So you using your health argument against gay marriage is simply silly and stupid. There is something called freedom of choice... we can drink, drive motorcycles, ski, sky dive, smoke, and so many other things that are less healthy, and the government doesn't stand in our way. Do you honestly believe I argue because I'm trying to win? Seriously? I care about truth, and that's it. If you want a serious discussion take it back in the other serious thread. So unless you come up with a real argument against gay marriages besides health... you are the loser. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Right, and you are mocking me for declaring myself the victor. I think you need to look in the mirror some. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Well if they're not going to defrock the pedophiles they shouldn't defrock the gays. Oh, wait, I get it...you sneaky Episcopalian, you. That's flat out not true. The overwhelming numbers of new HIV infections are in Africa, where the vast majority are heterosexual, followed by congenital. But that can't be right; Africa is where the pope just counseled people against using condemns. If Africa were where AIDS was spreading fastest, and spreading by heterosexual contact to boot -- why, that would make the pope a font of pure evil! Oh, wait, I get it...you sneaky Episcopalian, you. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|