LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-18-2009, 12:17 AM   #1
pissmanvd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default Governments should not allow men to become Catholic Priests
It's a health issue!!
pissmanvd is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 12:30 AM   #2
ZIDouglas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
This is why you don't talk to Ben, Ming. The constant not getting the point... either deliberately or because he's a moron.
ZIDouglas is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 12:51 AM   #3
n2Oddw8P

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
only women should be priests, and they should be forced to preach naked... first it would fill the churches again, than it would stop porn and turn everyone gay, thus ending overpopulation + resulting deforestation of the environment due to human overpopulation pressures...

the forests would grow back, consuming excess C02, saving the world from global warming, preventing war and famine... the world would go back to state of balance and long term prosperity of the humankind would be ensured... I agree with this thread title with a slight correction - Governments should not allow men to become Priests
n2Oddw8P is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 01:06 AM   #4
Habalinnyf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
In comparison, 45 percent of all new HIV infections are in gay men alone.
You could at least mask your joy, bigot...
Habalinnyf is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 01:34 AM   #5
Unoloknovagog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
You could at least mask your joy, bigot... One good troll deserves another.

I think you are the only one taking this thread seriously...
Unoloknovagog is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 01:39 AM   #6
@Aerodyno@

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
379
Senior Member
Default
One good troll deserves another.

I think you are the only one taking this thread seriously...
I know you are seriously a bigot.
@Aerodyno@ is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 01:45 AM   #7
IssuessBratte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
Mr Fun is not fun, so you are saying I am not gay.

Bigot.
IssuessBratte is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 01:59 AM   #8
UtidaBrar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it.
That sounds like something you would want...
UtidaBrar is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 02:16 AM   #9
ASSESTYTEAH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
That reminds me. I forgot to declare victory over this thread.
Victory.... HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAH

If you think... "Yet Gay men are about seven times as likely to die from AIDS.
By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it" is a victory, you really don't get it.

You're the one "trying" to use the logic that health is a reason to ban something... The simple fact is, some things are less healthy than others... that's reality. So you using your health argument against gay marriage is simply silly and stupid. There is something called freedom of choice... we can drink, drive motorcycles, ski, sky dive, smoke, and so many other things that are less healthy, and the government doesn't stand in our way.

So unless you come up with a real argument against gay marriages besides health... you are the loser.

Enjoy...
ASSESTYTEAH is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 05:07 AM   #10
AXGreg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
Yet Gay men are about seven times as likely to die from AIDS.

By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it.
Jesus Christ, Ben. Either you didn't read the OP or your mother repeatedly dropped you on your head when you were young.
AXGreg is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 05:32 AM   #11
Marlboro-oroblraM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
I would hate to lose the entertainment value of his lack of logic and facts, his poor arguing skills and all the other silliness that he spews... no need for the ignore list.
Marlboro-oroblraM is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 06:57 AM   #12
bashansasasasa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
702
Senior Member
Default
If you think... "Yet Gay men are about seven times as likely to die from AIDS.
By that logic we should ban homosexuality too while we are at it" is a victory, you really don't get it. Umm, I don't know about you, but I'm quite enjoying this thread.

You're the one "trying" to use the logic that health is a reason to ban something... The simple fact is, some things are less healthy than others... that's reality. So you using your health argument against gay marriage is simply silly and stupid. There is something called freedom of choice... we can drink, drive motorcycles, ski, sky dive, smoke, and so many other things that are less healthy, and the government doesn't stand in our way. Do you honestly believe I argue because I'm trying to win? Seriously?

I care about truth, and that's it. If you want a serious discussion take it back in the other serious thread.

So unless you come up with a real argument against gay marriages besides health... you are the loser.

Right, and you are mocking me for declaring myself the victor. I think you need to look in the mirror some.
bashansasasasa is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 09:36 AM   #13
Mqcawkzd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Well BK... you have still not come up with a real argument against gay marriages... so yeah, you are nothing more than a bigot and a loser
Mqcawkzd is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 04:21 PM   #14
Knongargoapex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
A good friend of mine was thinking about becoming a Catholic priest... Eventually converted to Orthodox so he could complete seminary and still commune in that most sensuous of cups...
He should have gone Protestant.
Knongargoapex is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 06:11 PM   #15
baskentt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Yet, you're a bigot that believes in supernatural beings. I think fantasy is more like. Ben World must be a happy place for you. That's ok. I don't mind people making fun of Ben World. I used to share your opinion about supernatural beings as well...
baskentt is offline


Old 05-18-2009, 10:21 PM   #16
Rellshare

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
I only call them as I see them... and most people I disagree with aren't bigots or losers...
Just people like you
Rellshare is offline


Old 05-19-2009, 01:38 AM   #17
Aniplinipsync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
Well if they're not going to defrock the pedophiles they shouldn't defrock the gays.
But if they defrock gays and pedophiles, the Church won't have any priests at all!

Oh, wait, I get it...you sneaky Episcopalian, you.


That's flat out not true. The overwhelming numbers of new HIV infections are in Africa, where the vast majority are heterosexual, followed by congenital. But that can't be right; Africa is where the pope just counseled people against using condemns. If Africa were where AIDS was spreading fastest, and spreading by heterosexual contact to boot -- why, that would make the pope a font of pure evil!

Oh, wait, I get it...you sneaky Episcopalian, you.
Aniplinipsync is offline


Old 05-19-2009, 02:26 AM   #18
reiruviartugs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
Unfortunately he believes in abstinence and husband and wives being faithful to one another. Strategies which actually work.
Not if your spouse is already HIV positive when you marry her/him, you moron.
reiruviartugs is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity