LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-11-2007, 10:53 PM   #1
lammaredder

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default man sues mcdonald's for 10 million for putting cheese on his burger
Hang all lawyers, with certain exceptions.
lammaredder is offline


Old 08-11-2007, 11:03 PM   #2
Grizli

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
Everyone makes mistakes.
Grizli is offline


Old 08-11-2007, 11:06 PM   #3
accelieda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
That's absurd, sorry. If you're allergic, and buying something that has a risk of (whatever) on it, it's your responsibility to check... sure McD should check also, but they would be liable in my mind to $2.49 - the price of the burger.

Taking two years to file lawsuits = ambulance chaser
accelieda is offline


Old 08-11-2007, 11:27 PM   #4
paratayoma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default


This lawsuit is indeed truly pathetic and will be a waste of a court's time. The only person winning here is the lawyer.
paratayoma is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 12:28 AM   #5
OQmYckYz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Poll:

Is this guy's...

1- Stupid

2- Greedy!


Or:
3- Greedy & Stupid!??
OQmYckYz is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 12:40 AM   #6
gSjQEEmq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
hahhaha
gSjQEEmq is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 12:50 AM   #7
23tommy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
Remember that old lady who sued and won some unspeakable amount of money after she spilled McDonald's coffee on herself, then became a symbol of the out-of-control plaintiffs bar?

But she was right. Unfortunately McD's didn't have to pay the million $ fee, because it was reduced to a few hundred thousand. But I think they did reduce the excessive heat to the industry standard afterwards, so at least that helped.
23tommy is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 01:23 AM   #8
pheelixoss

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
I hate threads like this. "Mr X sues Y for a silly reason." OMFG STOP THE PRESSES, THIS IS HIROSHIMA ALL OVER AGAIN!

Get over yourselves. The only difference between this man suing some company for no reason and me banging my girlfriend is that suing a company costs a few thousand in lawyer fees. Well, guess what I can get a hooker for a few grand too. Not silly enough for a news story, you say? I can dress her up like Ronald McDonald and put it on youtube....Now THAT IS NEWS! Maybe it will get even more interesting if she SUES ME! I'd lose it in my pants!

Dis, be ashamed of yourself. I wouldn't put cheese on my 6 inch roast beef sub at Subway, self restraint Putting cheese on a hamburger is like putting icing on the bullet that you use to blow your own head off.
pheelixoss is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 01:38 AM   #9
Mugflefusysef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Remember that old lady who sued and won some unspeakable amount of money after she spilled McDonald's coffee on herself, then became a symbol of the out-of-control plaintiffs bar?

But she was right. Unfortunately McD's didn't have to pay the million $ fee, because it was reduced to a few hundred thousand. But I think they did reduce the excessive heat to the industry standard afterwards, so at least that helped. If I remember right, they paid 13 -15 Mill. You think that ladie still has a hot ?
Mugflefusysef is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 03:57 AM   #10
Mambattedge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DanQ


This lawsuit is indeed truly pathetic and will be a waste of a court's time. The only person winning here is the lawyer. The great Zkribblo predicts:

The claim for punitive damages will be thrown out. There's no indication here of malice.

The claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotion Distress with be thrown out. There's no indication of intentional conduct.

The claims of the two people who rushed the burger eater to the hospital will be thrown out. McDonald's conduct was not aimed at them.

If the case goes to trial, the burger eater willl get, at most, his $700 medical bills + an award for pain and suffering of, say, about $2,100. That's $2,800.

The attorney will take 40% or $1,120. Say he "hotdogs" the case and spends only about 20 hours on it -- that's $50.00/hour.

This leaves the burger eater with $1,680. If there's some depositions in this case (burger eater, two friends, McD people, and doctor), these expenses will eat up his award, and he might end up owning his attorney.

I don't know what the going rate for defense attorneys is there, but say it's $200/hr. A defense attorney will spend at least 50 hours on the case; so, he'll collect $10,000.
Mambattedge is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 05:39 AM   #11
bjacogaerllyo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Finally! Proof positive that the orange stuff on your Big Mac is actually cheese!!!
bjacogaerllyo is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 05:42 AM   #12
peveballery

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Joseph
If I remember right, they paid 13 -15 Mill. You think that ladie still has a hot ? Not even close. On appeal the punitive damage judgment was reduced to $480,000 (the compensatory damage judgment of $160,000 was kept in place). Then the two entered into a settlement agreement. No way if the last ruling was less than $750,000 would McD's accept a $13mil settlement.

http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbus..._mcdonalds.htm
peveballery is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 05:57 AM   #13
cliceperperIa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
You people are wierd. What does a lawsuit about a lady stupidly spilling hot coffee on her naughty bits have to do with this case?
cliceperperIa is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 06:01 AM   #14
plogypeskelry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
355
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by snoopy369
They were awarded like $13m but it was reduced on appeal to 300k or so. $2.7 in punitives. $160,000 in compensatory.

Numbers always get inflated in the telling of tall tales .
plogypeskelry is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 06:02 AM   #15
Woziwfaq

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
367
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DinoDoc
You people are wierd. What does a lawsuit about a lady stupidly spilling hot coffee on her naughty bits have to do with this case? The Defense Bar goes screaming to the media with stories like the McDonald's coffee case, so it can argue to the Legislature that we need "caps" are part of "tort reform."

But they don't get tort reform. Rather, they trigger a lot of stupid "multimillion dollar" lawsuits from people who think our court system is a candy store. Thus, we get a case worth a couple of thousand (dripping wet) for an cheeseburger filed as a $10 million dollar suit.
Woziwfaq is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 12:50 PM   #16
poulaMahmah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
McD's coffee was too hot. OTOH an idiot who puts a paper cup of fresh coffee between her legs doesnt deserve compensation when she burns herself.
poulaMahmah is offline


Old 08-12-2007, 10:31 PM   #17
Sertvfdnhgjk

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
That stuff ain't cheese, it's "processed cheese product."
Sertvfdnhgjk is offline


Old 08-13-2007, 01:23 AM   #18
myhackingtosh_ws

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
They did... the jury judged the woman only 20% at fault because of McD's negligence in hot coffee issues.
myhackingtosh_ws is offline


Old 08-13-2007, 02:12 AM   #19
Muesrasrs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Gibsie
Good god Zkribbler, someone already posted the link to the wikipedia page, you have no excuse to keep repeating such wrong information about that case. 1) The car was stationary 2) The jury DID reduce the amount (By 20%) end of. Where the christ did you get the speedbump hallucination from?! Sorry I offended you by missing the Wikipedia link. I was repeating info from a newspaper article I read at the time.

The Wikipedia article is detailed enough to be quite convincing, and I should know better not to trust newspapers.
Muesrasrs is offline


Old 08-13-2007, 02:39 AM   #20
wantedLOX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Zkribbler
I was repeating info from a newspaper article I read at the time. Thinking more about it, my info wasn't from an article but rather from a response in Dear Abby. I distinctly remember it because it was so unusual for Abby to get into news stories like that.
wantedLOX is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity