LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-10-2012, 10:28 PM   #1
Yinekol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default Trapwire................
WIKILEAKS: Surveillance Cameras Around The Country Are Being Used In A Huge Spy Network

David Seaman, David Seaman Online | Aug. 10, 2012, 2:49 PM | 12,908 | 44



Byte88 via flickr


David Seaman



URL

David Seaman is host of The DL Show and a prominent new media advocate. Follow him on Twitter (new!) and Google+. Previously, David founded the popular credit card deals web site, Outlaw. David Seaman's views are his own, and Business Insider's publication of his work is not an endorsement.






The U.S. cable networks won't be covering this one tonight (not accurately, anyway), but Trapwire is making the rounds on social media today—it reportedly became a Trending hashtag on Twitter earlier in the day. Trapwire is the name of a program revealed in the latest Wikileaks bonanza—it is the mother of all leaks, by the way. Trapwire would make something like disclosure of UFO contact or imminent failure of a major U.S. bank fairly boring news by comparison.
And the ambitious techno-fascists behind Trapwire seem to be quite disappointed that word is getting out so swiftly; the Wikileaks web site is reportedly sustaining 10GB worth of DDoS attacks each second, which is massive.
Anyway, here's what Trapwire is, according to Russian-state owned media network RT (apologies for citing "foreign media"... if we had a free press, I'd be citing something published here by an American media conglomerate): "Former senior intelligence officials have created a detailed surveillance system more accurate than modern facial recognition technology—and have installed it across the U.S. under the radar of most Americans, according to emails hacked by Anonymous.
Every few seconds, data picked up at surveillance points in major cities and landmarks across the United States are recorded digitally on the spot, then encrypted and instantaneously delivered to a fortified central database center at an undisclosed location to be aggregated with other intelligence. It’s part of a program called TrapWire and it's the brainchild of the Abraxas, a Northern Virginia company staffed with elite from America’s intelligence community.
The employee roster at Arbaxas reads like a who’s who of agents once with the Pentagon, CIA and other government entities according to their public LinkedIn profiles, and the corporation's ties are assumed to go deeper than even documented. The details on Abraxas and, to an even greater extent TrapWire, are scarce, however, and not without reason. For a program touted as a tool to thwart terrorism and monitor activity meant to be under wraps, its understandable that Abraxas would want the program’s public presence to be relatively limited. But thanks to last year’s hack of the Strategic Forecasting intelligence agency, or Stratfor, all of that is quickly changing."
So: those spooky new "circular" dark globe cameras installed in your neighborhood park, town, or city—they aren't just passively monitoring. They're plugged into Trapwire and they are potentially monitoring every single person via facial recognition.
In related news, the Obama administration is fighting in federal court this week for the ability to imprison American citizens under NDAA's indefinite detention provisions—and anyone else—without charge or trial, on suspicion alone.
So we have a widespread network of surveillance cameras across America monitoring us and reporting suspicious activity back to a centralized analysis center, mixed in with the ability to imprison people via military force on the basis of suspicious activity alone. I don't see how that could possibly go wrong. Nope, not at all. We all know the government, and algorithmic computer programs, never make mistakes.
Here's what is also so disturbing about this whole NDAA business: "This past week's hearing was even more terrifying. Government attorneys again, in this hearing, presented no evidence to support their position and brought forth no witnesses. Most incredibly, Obama's attorneys refused to assure the court, when questioned, that the NDAA's section 1021 – the provision that permits reporters and others who have not committed crimes to be detained without trial – has not been applied by the U.S. government anywhere in the world after Judge Forrest's injunction. In other words, they were telling a U.S. federal judge that they could not, or would not, state whether Obama's government had complied with the legal injunction that she had laid down before them. To this, Judge Forrest responded that if the provision had indeed been applied, the United States government would be in contempt of court."

http://www.businessinsider.com/trapw...to-know-2012-8
Yinekol is offline


Old 08-10-2012, 11:58 PM   #2
wllsqyuipknczx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
If true, that is some serious stuff right there. And . . . I just know it's true. It's so cliche to reference, but 1984 is here.
wllsqyuipknczx is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 07:47 AM   #3
RerRibreLok

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
666
Senior Member
Default
RerRibreLok is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 05:20 PM   #4
MilenaMKB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
570
Senior Member
Default
We are going to be a safe as London in no time flat
MilenaMKB is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 05:20 PM   #5
JaK_MarkoV_Pi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
dam
JaK_MarkoV_Pi is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 06:09 PM   #6
jesyflowers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
We are going to be a safe as London in no time flat
London is so safe 'cause no one has any guns, like Chicago.
jesyflowers is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 06:25 PM   #7
bonyrek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
i was wondering how cash strapped municipalities ALWAYS had megabucks available for high tech surveillance cameras on every major intersection.
bonyrek is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 06:50 PM   #8
joulseenjoync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
i was wondering how cash strapped municipalities ALWAYS had megabucks available for high tech surveillance cameras on every major intersection.
What's noteworthy is that the more middle class a neighborhood/area, the more likely there'll be at least four 'traffic' cameras at the most minor traffic light intersections, while on the dark side of town one very rarely sees these 'traffic cameras' even on heavily traveled intersections. Very peculiar.
joulseenjoync is offline


Old 08-11-2012, 10:25 PM   #9
greeferweq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
What's noteworthy is that the more middle class a neighborhood/area, the more likely there'll be at least four 'traffic' cameras at the most minor traffic light intersections, while on the dark side of town one very rarely sees these 'traffic cameras' even on heavily traveled intersections. Very peculiar.
They probably destroy them every Saturday night
greeferweq is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 04:53 AM   #10
ZIDouglas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
i was wondering how cash strapped municipalities ALWAYS had megabucks available for high tech surveillance cameras on every major intersection.
They get it from the Gubbermint and what gubbermint wants it always has money for.


Remember those Digital Box converters?

Flu Vaccines.

Gun buy Backs.

Anything to keep you further under their control they got TONS of cash.
ZIDouglas is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 03:45 PM   #11
wCYvMKAc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
What's noteworthy is that the more middle class a neighborhood/area, the more likely there'll be at least four 'traffic' cameras at the most minor traffic light intersections, while on the dark side of town one very rarely sees these 'traffic cameras' even on heavily traveled intersections. Very peculiar.
Thats as damning a proof as we need to hurl their " its about fighting crime" excuse back in their face. we know theres way more crime in,as you say, "the dark side of town".
wCYvMKAc is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 06:23 PM   #12
Kk21pwa9

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
Thats as damning a proof as we need to hurl their " its about fighting crime" excuse back in their face. we know theres way more crime in,as you say, "the dark side of town".
Whether the excuse is 'fighting crime' or 'facilitating the flow of traffic' (lol), neither is true, all indications are that the producers are being watched.
Kk21pwa9 is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 10:11 PM   #13
nizcreare

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
What's noteworthy is that the more middle class a neighborhood/area, the more likely there'll be at least four 'traffic' cameras at the most minor traffic light intersections, while on the dark side of town one very rarely sees these 'traffic cameras' even on heavily traveled intersections. Very peculiar.
They probably destroy them every Saturday night
No, it's that they won't make a dime citing folks in the bad areas of the city. The money comes from the middle class folks who pay their fines.
nizcreare is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 10:22 PM   #14
Stacypettlerr

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default
wow. This is basically proof that I'm being tracked whenever I go anywhere. I mean, how hard is it to take a picture of a license plate number and record when and where it was seen?
Stacypettlerr is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 10:24 PM   #15
beepbeet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
what i want to know is, which digital camera company got the contract ?

it sounds like these are glorified high-res webcams.

buy them from Newegg for $100, sell them to DHS for $1000 ... use the profits to buy PM's ?
beepbeet is offline


Old 08-12-2012, 10:28 PM   #16
Aceroassert

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
what i want to know is, which digital camera company got the contract ?

it sounds like these are glorified high-res webcams.

buy them from Newegg for $100, sell them to DHS for $1000 ... use the profits to buy PM's ?
You're not thinking big enough

It costs, on average, $31,847 per month to operate each red light camera intersection in Philadelphia
http://mainlinemedianews.com/article...e152011988.txt It cost the city $2,200 each day to operate one red light camera ($66k per month per camera)
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/coun...years-but-why/
Aceroassert is offline


Old 08-13-2012, 02:54 PM   #17
BuyNetHosting

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
how much you wanna bet its a jewish co or one that has ties to the IDF? at least the tracking software.
BuyNetHosting is offline


Old 08-13-2012, 07:55 PM   #18
emuffette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
i was wondering how cash strapped municipalities ALWAYS had megabucks available for high tech surveillance cameras on every major intersection.
but those cameras are profit centers. they give cities the technical ability to crank up the traffic fines as needed to balance the budget.

sort of like those children's stories where there's a troll hiding under every bridge.
emuffette is offline


Old 08-20-2012, 12:47 PM   #19
VewCoorkPow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Orwell and Huxley would be so proud.....This technology was 'created' by 3 ex-CIA agents..... LOL

Another 'Evil' Corporation:

http://www.abraxascorp.com/

"There is no place in New York City that you can go; outside or inside, that you are not on camera. We call it 'The Eye of God".
VewCoorkPow is offline


Old 08-20-2012, 01:24 PM   #20
b91ZmxzX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
I wonder if this would work to foil the license plate reading part of the system?

License-plate spray foils traffic cameras

| |

Anty Radar Spray

License plate spray foils traffic cameras

This interesting article from Washington Times addresses some of the key issues regarding anty radar spray hiding license plate and blinding traffic radar. A careful reading of this material could make a big difference in how you think about anty radar spray, spray traffic cameras, hide license plate radar, traffic radar, phantom plate.
Now that we've covered those aspects of anty radar spray, spray traffic cameras, hide license plate radar, traffic radar, let's turn to some of the other factors that need to be considered.
Motorists have litigated against them, fired bullets at them and thrown garbage on them -- all to get back at the traffic cameras that have caught them in the act of running a red light or speeding.
Now they have a new weapon in their arsenal, and it comes in a can for 69.00 Euro. A clear spray called Photo Blocker can be applied to license plates to make them hyper-reflective and unreadable when the camera flashes.
The product, marketed by OPM Security, defies laws that preclude motorists from placing covers over their license plates but have no provisions for a clear spray.
Joe Scott, the marketing director for Photo Blocker, said he knows of no jurisdictions that ban the spray. Most states have laws against obscuring or distorting license plates, but Photo Blocker obscures the license plate only in a photo, Mr. Scott said, making it legal or at least difficult for police to detect with the naked eye.
Capt. John Lamb of the Denver Police Department said a test of the spray proved effective at producing a glare over the license plate.
The District, Maryland and Virginia all have laws permitting the use of red-light cameras, and the Federal Highway Administration says 21 states have red-light or speed-detection cameras in place or are considering installing the devices.
Lt. Patrick Burke of the Metropolitan Police Department said the spray isn't banned by any laws in the District, but he has yet to see a spray that is effective.
The spray might slip through a loophole in state law, said Steve Kholer, a spokesman for the California Highway Patrol, who said he had not heard of the product. Citations in California can cost up to $275.
So now you know a little bit about anty radar spray, blinding traffic cameras, and hide license plate to radars. Even if you don't know everything, you've done something worthwhile: you've expanded your knowledge.


http://www.opmsecurity.com/security/...c-cameras.html
b91ZmxzX is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity