General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Sadly, A GOP appointed judge issued one of the most retarded and ill thought out rulings in recent memory about this.
http://bangornews.com/news/t/news.as...619&zoneid=500 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_J._McAuliffe So lets talk about the GOPs phone jamming tactics and the legal maneuvers used to get such an obviously guilty man from paying his debt to society. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Originally posted by Oerdin
Sadly, A GOP appointed judge issued one of the most retarded and ill thought out rulings in recent memory about this. ... A quote from the ruling dismissing the case: "But while deliberate disruption, vote suppression, and electoral success for his party were his goals," McAuliffe wrote, "there was no evidence that Tobin specifically intended to provoke adverse emotional reactions in the people at the telephone numbers called." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Originally posted by Zkribbler
![]() It seems Tobin and others were convicted for violating a statute which prohibits harassing phone calls. An appellate court reversed with directions, and ordered a new trial. That's when the above-mention trial court judge dismissed the case against Tobin, saying essentially, there was no evidence of harassment. That is, "while deliberate disruption, vote suppression, and electoral success for his party were his goals," McAuliffe wrote, "there was no evidence that Tobin specifically intended to provoke adverse emotional reactions in the people at the telephone numbers called." The judge's ruling makes more sense once the case is viewed as a harassment suit rather than a vote- suppression-type suit. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|