LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-23-2008, 12:04 AM   #1
buIf6yoW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default More Garden Variety GOP Criminality Implicates White House
Sadly, A GOP appointed judge issued one of the most retarded and ill thought out rulings in recent memory about this.

http://bangornews.com/news/t/news.as...619&zoneid=500

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_J._McAuliffe

So lets talk about the GOPs phone jamming tactics and the legal maneuvers used to get such an obviously guilty man from paying his debt to society.
buIf6yoW is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 12:14 AM   #2
BarBoss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Less then half are actually evil, evil GOP.
BarBoss is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 12:36 AM   #3
yatrahnualenu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Oerdin
Sadly, A GOP appointed judge issued one of the most retarded and ill thought out rulings in recent memory about this. ... A quote from the ruling dismissing the case:

"But while deliberate disruption, vote suppression, and electoral success for his party were his goals," McAuliffe wrote, "there was no evidence that Tobin specifically intended to provoke adverse emotional reactions in the people at the telephone numbers called." WTF??
yatrahnualenu is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 02:12 AM   #4
Bvghbopz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
Oerdin wantda play da IM DA BADASS torlll game.

chill homie or i will destrioys u.
Bvghbopz is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 02:32 AM   #5
Ervins Dervish

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Zkribbler
WTF?? I just read another article in one of our local rags, which is more illuminating that the above articles.

It seems Tobin and others were convicted for violating a statute which prohibits harassing phone calls. An appellate court reversed with directions, and ordered a new trial.

That's when the above-mention trial court judge dismissed the case against Tobin, saying essentially, there was no evidence of harassment. That is, "while deliberate disruption, vote suppression, and electoral success for his party were his goals," McAuliffe wrote, "there was no evidence that Tobin specifically intended to provoke adverse emotional reactions in the people at the telephone numbers called."

The judge's ruling makes more sense once the case is viewed as a harassment suit rather than a vote- suppression-type suit.
Ervins Dervish is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 03:21 AM   #6
Edisesyethisp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default
Read the articles available to him, and see if you can come to a conclusion other than he did.
Edisesyethisp is offline


Old 02-23-2008, 03:44 AM   #7
texprofi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
556
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Patroklos
Which is why Oeridn and his ilk took pains not to portray it in that light. It's voter supression plain and simple. That's the reason they systematically did it on election day.
texprofi is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity