General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Decided to go on a Kubrick movie watching theme, and came across this documentary.
I've never heard about this one before, but holy fuck if there aren't some pretty unbelievable coincidences going on tied in with the US military from Dr Strange Love, the cold war with Russia, the Apollo moon landing, the shining, and Eyes wide shut. Kinda blowing my mind a bit right now with the Shining, the Kids sweater, and Room 237. In a nutshell, he made a deal with the US military, ends up faking some of the moon landing footage, from that touches the inner circle, then exposes it through his movies. Was reading some scenes of eyes wide shut were shot at one of the Rothschild mansions. Crazy stuff. "Kubrick's Odyssey - Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick (2011) This documentary explains in detail what filming techniques Kubrick used to fake the Apollo 11 moon landing. The second part shows how Kubrick used his movie 'The Shining' to reveal to the world the dark secret to the world about mission A11. They probably did land on the moon, but the films and pictures we have been shown - without doubt - have all been manufactured by the great director and artist of 2001 - A Space Odyssey. The evidence shown in this film is simply irrefutable. However, with his movie 'Eyes Wide Shut' Kubrick had gone too far and that's why he had to be silenced forever. Under the masonic moon..." http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6562...f_Stanley_Kubr You may wish to check out Kubrick - a Life in Pictures as a primer: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5575...JohnnyDavidson |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
as an aside, the life in pictures is a necessary pre requisite to watching hidden secrets so you can understand why Kubrick made so few films as he would spend weeks shooting a single scene.
This guy was the ultimate perfectionist, so nothing you are seeing is thrown together. It is all methodically, and painstakingly thought out. In The Shining the kid is playing with trucks on a carpet that resembles the NASA launch pad. He connects a cargo truck to pull the "cargo" (rocket) to it's location on the launch pad, the kid stands up wearing a sweater with the Apollo 11 rocket across the front of his sweater, the "launches" after a ball comes out of nowhere saying "come and play". He rises up, "launches Apollo 11", and proceeds to room 237 which was changed from 217 in the book. Why change the room #? The moon is on average 237 miles from earth. Turns out the hotel is symbolic for America. On the key to the room "Room no 237" is focused on. "Room no" spells two words "Moon Room". The same hypothetical room where he would shoot the Apollo room footage allegedly faked for the public during the cold war space race. Coincidence? Why change the room #? Again, nothing down to the smallest detail is by chance in his movies. Interesting if anything. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
JOBOO, you are on to something big, he may have even been
put on ice for his last movie, he was a deep insider of the NWO crowd. EYES WIDE SHUT, one of the creepiest movies out there. There is lots of analysis, or was, online about this. The title itself is Masonic and their entire MO is in the movie. A lot of what is discussed on these forums is in the movie. The analysis online is mind boggling, people that know the Masons in detail. Some details of Kubrick's life are revealing if true. Like living in Asia, being gay maybe, he was given a heart attack possibly right after his movie. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
In The Shining, Kubrick changed things from the book that made no sense at all to change. If he changed it, he did it for a reason.
Little things like the color of the VW car from red to yellow, but then he shows the red VW crashed on the side of the road by the hotel driving by in the yellow VW signifying Kubrick "wrecked" Stephen Kings original adaptation. He used two twin girls instead of one for the previous caretakers daughters. Jack is the new caretaker. Why do this? The previous Apollo mission 10 was code name Gemeni...twins. Then in the final scene Jack (Kubrick) is holding a secret note in his hand, and a member of the hotel (i.e. America's) secret society inner circle is trying to get Jack (Kubrick) to put his arm down to silence him. Again, this is all in the first documentary. Shame it wasn't a lot longer. Intriguing! Capture.JPG |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Serpo posted this youtube vid yesterday.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...ses-Illuminati http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2N14...ayer_embedded# He lost me, and I don't remember if it was in vid one or two. The guy starts talking that "PedoBear" was a creation of the illuminati. And how our earthly overlords referred to Kubrick as a bear. I thought it was a creation from 4-chan. The guy starts off strong, but finishes very thin. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Very good, Kubrick made a deal with the devil, and did his best to expose it. It seems a lot of the Apollo moon landing footage could have been faked to psyche out the Russians during the cold war. They landed on the moon, but not all of what was presented appears to be real. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
kubrick did all sorts of weird "moving objects" stuff in his films as well. if you watch the shining and pause it a lot, stuff moves. they'l be a vase sitting in one spot, the scene will switch for a second, and then when it comes back the vase will be gone or moved 4 inches. it's all over the movie and it's obviously intentional. the cans in the storeroom are a perfect example. there's no cans in one shot, then the next shot, there's a row of calumet baking powder there. paper magically appears in jacks typewritter. paintings that move in dick hallroam's apartment. posters on the walls of danny's room. change on the counter i the payphone scene. there's lots of changing people's clothes as well. it's creepy as fuck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
The Shining IS a really creepy movie, and is still a great one after all these years. To me it's a lot like Rosemary's Baby in creepiness. *shudder*
As for the faked photos of the Apollo moon landing, Jay Weidner wrote an interesting article called, "How Stanley Kubrick faked the Apollo Moon Landings: Alchemical Kubrick II" (a good read for those of you who, like me, are too impatient to watch YouTube videos.) I don't know much about photography, but found the information about the Scotchlite reflective material and the possibility that it was used to fake the moon landing photographs very intriguing: "This was a screen material that was made up of hundreds of thousands of glass beads each about 25mm wide. These beads were highly reflective. The Scotchlite screen would be placed at the back of the soundstage."While I was googling around looking for the URL to this article, I came across a posting about it on the Reality Sandwich site. When I find interesting articles, I usually scan the comments to see if like-minded people have posted some related information I can pursue to learn more. There were some good ones here, but this one caught my eye: Next up on Reality Sandwich: Did the Holocaust actually happen? Any takers? You want to see their evidence? And their explanations? At least hear their arguments, right? It was all fun and games, until we discovered that ideas are consequential. "Why so serious," Lion? Because ideas, even imagined ideas, for entertainment purposes, can kill. [ ![]() I'm not one for censorship, but I am one for persuasive argument. By the way, it was Arthur C Clark who set Monolith dimensions to 1:4:9, or, 2.25:1. 2.35:1 is a common movie theater widescreen. (Read an article on aspect ratios in film.) Plans were to shoot Cinerama, but Douglas Trumbull recommended a shift to Super Panavision 70 instead for technical reasons. When it was first released, it was released at 2.21:1, which is typical for 70mm film. You people say you're on a spiritual quest, but you lie to yourselves whenever you can; You hunger for food, but you eat candy. I have said it before, and I will say it again: You cannot enchant reality. Reality is either enchanting, or it is not. There is the possibility that you could see real enchantment in the world, but you decide to surround yourselves with illusions instead. If you wrapped yourselves in beauty, that would be one thing, but when you try to convince yourselves it's real, you spoil everything. In your efforts to be amazed, you preclude yourself from authentic amazement. Until you open yourself to the really real, as the best of science and reason can reveal itself to us, you cannot see true divinity-- only shadows of it. This isn't "Lion being mean," this is a simple fact of existence. That you refuse to look, breaks my heart. I was leaning more towards the skeptical side when I was reading the Weidner article, but if someone goes through all the trouble of trying (but I must say, failing) to link it with Holocaust Denial, well then I'm more inclined to believe it than not. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
JOBOO, you are on to something big, he may have even been |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
When Danny is playing alone in the corridor, with his toy cars and trucks, in the overhead shot, the little vehicles are set up on the orange and brown pattern, as the ball roles to him down the center brown path in the carpet's sextagon pattern. However, in Danny's close-up, when the ball is in front of him, all the little toy vehicles are now set up (still the same way) on the opposite side of the carpet's distinct pattern, as he also faces the opposite way. This mistake has absolutely nothing to do with the ghosts of The Outlook moving the ball.
http://www.moviemistakes.com/film1151 ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
That's what imtalking about, only it's my contention that none of it is a movie mistake. The shining has literally dozens of these things. If you google around you can find sites with pages of pictures detailing all of the weird shit kubrick did in that film. And even if he did make a mistake, it was on purpose. Lol. Kubrick is the quintessential director. Other directors may allow mistakes in their films, but if something is in a Kubrick film, you can rest assured he meant for it to be there. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
The guy starts talking that "PedoBear" was a creation of the illuminati. And how our earthly overlords referred to Kubrick as a bear. I thought it was a creation from 4-chan. I have no clue personally, but some online have reported he lived in Asia for easy access to boys. Those are just internet posts, how do we know. The NeoCons were caught doing honey traps, Sibel Edmonds reports and testimony, they totally got away with it. Alot of the Pedo scandals are honey traps using kids. Like Dutroux scandal, Franklin coverup, etc, Wayne Madsen has some articles on this as well, the diplomatic core in Asia specifically. Eyes Wide Shut , has this in the movie as well. Everyone on GSUS should watch the movie and do some searches online for all the specific Masonic references. Also in the movie, the Masons at the top are the intelligence agencies, the inner circle, most that work for them have no clue. The outer circle that does " good " shields the inner. Applies to Masons and CIA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
I referred to Asia above and Kubrick being gay, |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
We should have a GSUS screening, some people in the audience may be exposed. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67754264973286 Depending on what add ons you have, downloadable too. Another vid about "We Live" and what the underlying of the movie was. I have to admit, someone posted this over at the deuce. Well worth the time to watch the three vids. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0OJM...eature=related |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|