LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-17-2011, 07:06 AM   #1
Preorbtat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default Mario Kills Tanooki - PETA says
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/inte...-mario-3d-land


Really? Trying to get the media's attention now. How sad.
Preorbtat is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 07:21 AM   #2
b91ZmxzX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
The game is pretty creative though. I got an LOL out of it.

http://features.peta.org/mario-kills-tanooki/
b91ZmxzX is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 10:28 AM   #3
Enfonebew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
peta also kill more animals than anyone else

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
Enfonebew is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 10:47 AM   #4
TubOppomo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
peta also kill more animals than anyone else

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.
TubOppomo is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 10:51 AM   #5
cypedembeda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
As long as they keep dressing up hot chicks in nothing, or near nothing, I'm cool with anything they do. Only peta can make furries seem hot.
cypedembeda is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 10:55 AM   #6
Plokiikmol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.
No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"

PETA is nothing but scum, they don't like animal testing for diseases.

Hell they don't even want you to own pets. They think that owning animals is wrong.
Plokiikmol is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 11:28 AM   #7
osteoftex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"

PETA is nothing but scum, they don't like animal testing for diseases.

Hell they don't even want you to own pets. They think that owning animals is wrong.
Look I agree with you. I don't like PETA as much as the next bloke. Never said otherwise.
osteoftex is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 11:36 AM   #8
carreraboyracer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.
So I guess 1.86% adoption rate clearly means they are doing their campaign right.
carreraboyracer is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 03:50 PM   #9
Inettypofonee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
So I guess 1.86% adoption rate clearly means they are doing their campaign right.
Probably because they prefer to kill the animal rather than allow an 'unsuitable' person to adopt the animal.
Remember, these are the same nutters that released minks in Britain, to decimate the local wildlife population, that 'free' battery hens to be frozen to death, to starve or be eaten alive by predators.
While I'm against animal cruelty, I'm an omnivore who remembers those words by Tennyson - "nature, red in tooth and claw" - nature is a least as cruel as we are.
Inettypofonee is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 09:30 PM   #10
IoninnyHaro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"
The worst thing about it is PETA helps fund groups that protest against shelters that euthanize animals that they can't place. Meanwhile PETA does **** all to place the animals they get in their shelters insuring that they have to use the same methods that kill shelters do.
IoninnyHaro is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 10:44 PM   #11
AlissBart

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
Where can I get one of those cat-head ribbed dildos in the picture?

AlissBart is offline


Old 11-17-2011, 11:33 PM   #12
Cofeeman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
595
Senior Member
Default
This is the best description of PETA ever.

Penn And Teller
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Cofeeman is offline


Old 11-18-2011, 12:39 AM   #13
dr-eavealer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
603
Senior Member
Default
I liked the game.

I hope that in next Mario games he uses different animal skins so we get a bit more variety.
dr-eavealer is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity