General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
An astrobiologist working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center outside Huntsville, Alabama has made an astounding claim. In a recently published journal article, he claims to have discovered a preserved alien life form residing inside a meteor that journeyed through the vast black of space before impact our planet. I guess time will tell
![]() http://www.dailytech.com/NASA+Resear...ticle21059.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
A rock that spent several thousand years sitting on earth... |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
A rock that spent several thousand years sitting on earth... The meteors were sterilely harvested in the frigid reaches of Antarctica immediately after their observed fall. "I've just dropped my glasses in jam. Wow - my glasses have jam on them - that jam must have been part of the manafacturing process of my glasses". the bacteria they say it is like contains a lot of sulphur and is found in sulphide rich mud in spain (among god knows where else). i'm guessing it isnt found often in the antarctic. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
after reading it all it appears that he went way overboard with his claim. yes it is a finding but just that. he has found something in a meteorite and it appears to be bacteria.. that is it, nothing else, and he should have presented his finding accordingly. instead he has sensationalized it to the point of it not being believable. it could very well be evidence of ET and just as well could be terrestrial but it's way to early in the study to make such claims. Do you realize that your entire post is full of assumptions that are criticizing... assuming? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
This story has been met with near universal skepticism among scientists. The article was published in the "Journal of Cosmology", an online journal run by a small group of cranks who think that life on Earth originated from outer space. NASA has distanced itself from the paper.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
This story has been met with near universal skepticism among scientists. The article was published in the "Journal of Cosmology", an online journal run by a small group of cranks who think that life on Earth originated from outer space. NASA has distanced itself from the paper. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
I have a feeling he may not be for very much longer. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Antarctica used to be connected to the other continents so no it's not impossible for fossilized bacterial life forms to be found there untouched for 1000's of years. So tell me how these fossils magically made their way to the surface? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Nasa has claimed to find alien life form in meteors in the past, and have been proven wrong by the scientific community on more than one occasion, so now they stand neutral on the subject. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|