General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Another thought: How well would creeping vines do in Mont's climate? I'm talking the kinds that enjoy growing all over the sides of buildings. I can see some decids in there without their leaves, one pine tree (like I said, they're happy in winter and look good with the building), and my eyes can't easily make out what's going on in the space between the street and the building proper. Is that the winter mix of Grass-sidewalk-dirty snow?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Another thought: How well would creeping vines do in Mont's climate? I'm talking the kinds that enjoy growing all over the sides of buildings. I can see some decids in there without their leaves, one pine tree (like I said, they're happy in winter and look good with the building), and my eyes can't easily make out what's going on in the space between the street and the building proper. Is that the winter mix of Grass-sidewalk-dirty snow? |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Here's an example of brutalism in Washington, D.C. Third Church of Christ Scientist. The Christian Scientists have wanted to tear this damn thing down for years.
The problem with obliterating these abominations is that you have a number of people on architectural boards who will fight for keeping examples of notable architecture styles, even if the building is an abomination. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Here's an example of brutalism in Washington, D.C. Third Church of Christ Scientist. The Christian Scientists have wanted to tear this damn thing down for years. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
On second thought, it's not a totally unmitigated NAY. There is one example of brutalist architecture in Washington that I like -- Metrorail. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Why is it called brutalism? The English architects Alison and Peter Smithson coined the term in 1953, from the French béton brut, or "raw concrete," a phrase used by Le Corbusier to describe the poured board-marked concrete with which he constructed many of his post-WWII buildings. The term gained wide currency when the British architectural critic Reyner Banham used it in the title of his 1966 book, The New Brutalism: Ethic or Aesthetic?, to characterize a by then established cluster of architectural approaches, particularly in Europe. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|