General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I first heard about this a while ago. It's pretty local to me, but I think I might be far enough away for me not to be affected if it does go off. What's to be done about it, I dunno. ________ Buy medical marijuana vaporizer |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
I'm close, but not that close. See the map below. I live in Sittingbourne, at the bottom. The wreck is just off Sheerness, about a 12 minute train ride away. I've been there, but haven't spotted the wreck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Some of the links suggest over 3000 tons of explosives left on the ship - reminiscent of the Halifax tragedy!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Explosion |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Ah, Coast. Excellent series.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Ah, Coast. Excellent series. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
hmm I thought it was ****.. but hey only things of it I found interesting was mounsell forts http://www.undergroundkent.co.uk/maunsell_towers.htm and the ss Montgomery |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
hmm I thought it was ****.. but hey only things of it I found interesting was mounsell forts http://www.undergroundkent.co.uk/maunsell_towers.htm and the ss Montgomery |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Actually, there is a lost nuclear bomb off the coast of Savannah, GA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
hmm I thought it was ****.. but hey only things of it I found interesting was mounsell forts http://www.undergroundkent.co.uk/maunsell_towers.htm and the ss Montgomery |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Those forts are quite cool, you can see them clearly from Southend Pier, walked to the end because I hoped it was possible to see some of the wreck from there but it was too far out. [thumbdown] From the map it looks like it would be easiest to see the wreck from Sheerness. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
IN THE Thames estuary, 60 kilometers from central London, lies the 60-year-old wreck of the American liberty ship Richard Montgomery. It still carries 1400 tonnes of TNT, and according to a report commissioned by the UK government, an explosion is "increasingly probable with the passing of time". Which makes it odd that it has taken four years to publish the report, which will appear this week.
New Scientist revealed last year that the then secret report warned of the dangers posed by the wreck (21 August 2004, p 36). The ship is disintegrating and is likely to start collapsing in 10 to 20 years' time. "Experience from other similar wrecks indicates that the explosion of one munition is likely to result in a mass explosion," the report says. It would be the world's biggest non-nuclear explosion apart from volcanoes, and would cause £1 billion of damage and widespread injuries to the public. It would be the world's biggest non-nuclear explosion apart from volcanoes Removing the explosives would mean evacuating 40,000 people for six months. The report's favoured solution is to build an 1800-meter earthwork around the wreck to deaden the blast of the explosion. info taken from new scientist. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4032629.stm http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A22716759 http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/i...wsci210804.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery http://www.submerged.co.uk/montgomery.php same thing happened just off of Folkestone... a ship carrying explosives blew up digging a 20ft crater in the sea bed, causing an earthquake of magnitude 5 on the sphincter scale scaring the towns people to death ![]() oh dear.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
That's quite a lot of explosives, especially when it breaks it down...
286 × 2,000 lb (910 kg) bombs 4,439 × 1,000 lb (450 kg) bombs of various types 1,925 × 500 lb (230 kg) bombs 2,815 fragmentation bombs and bomb clusters Smoke bombs, including white phosphorus smoke bombs Pyrotechnic signals Booster charges Probably more risky to touch. Bit of a shitter really. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
When it said Thames Estuary I thought it meant slap bang in the middle of London for some reason.
Maybe it would be cheaper to evacuate everyone from the area for a day, set the thing off and just pay compensation to the damage caused rather than evacuating and rehousing everyone for six months with the risk of it going off anyway ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|