[sandracuk]

[xqdrocherz]

Will Wezil claim postsomnia for posting 3 threads in one day?

[sam]

Teh UN one.

[Mjypksun]

Oh

[ceagsoosy]

Necrophiling recent threads

Necrophiling several-year-old threads

[EasyLOAD]

Originally posted by Wezil
Do you suffer b etor? oh no way. i remember eeeeeeeverything.


but i feel for the dude.

[wonceinee]

"Oh, I'm embarrassed" is a recognition of your mistake not an apology for the false accusation.

[arrasleds]

I'll move on since you've fouled my thread enough with these baseless accusations.

The UN thread was resurrected b/c the UN supporters went into hiding the 1st time (how Un-ish). They're still hiding.

On topic - So how about that defence? I would be more skeptical if I hadn't experienced sleep walking first hand.

[muBXvWIC]

parasomnia has been a defence here for many years now (a case going back to the 80's as I recall). I've never heard of sexsomnia before but I can see where it comes from.

The parasomnia precedent was a guy that drove across town and killed his mother-in-law (with a knife?) then drove home and went back to bed. He claimed he was essentially "sleep-walking" and didn't remember a thing. Dr's backed this possibility up and he was acquitted as he obviously couldn't have formed the requisite intent if this was true.

[duawLauff]

I wouldn't want to share a "secure unit" with someone that suffers this condition.

[giturbewan]

So if he isn't responsible becasue he can't control it, and there is a course of medication that is able to stop the "illness" 100% of the time with negligable side effects (defined as anything that doesn't forshorten his life expectancy; affecting quality of life and he should still go on the meds) then why isn't it already in use? That should be gross negligence on the part of his psychiatrist

[JackTimQSR]

Wow! The twinkie defense is still working. I can't believe it.

[OlegSan]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Wow! The twinkie defense is still working. I can't believe it. I heard some numbers on this type of defence this morning. Iirc, it has been used 7 times in the last 13 years. Successful twice.

It's obviously a high bar to get over.

I have sleepwalked in the past so as I say I can at least understand the defence w/o dismissing it outright. That said, I know little about things medical so I have no idea if the condition can really be this bad but I would not be surprised.

[avdddcxnelkaxz]

At least his sexsomniac side knew to put on a rubber.

[illiniastibly]

First of all check to see what the refutation was to the other 11 uses of this defence. I'm not sure if there is/can be one that doesn't use medical literature contrary to what teh defence used.

[loolitoertego]

Originally posted by Krill
Unless that means never the guy should be sectioned I assume that's what the words no hospitalization and state unable to monitor him means.

[AsmViktor]

Originally posted by Krill
Guess again? Well what does it mean?

[Arrectiff]

I refuse to post anything sexually suggestive or humorous in this thread.

Even a pottymouth like me knows there are times when it's too easy a target.

[Kvkcgktl]

Originally posted by Wezil
Ahh, go ahead. No, sorry. No sexually suggestive phrases, words, or sentences will be spoken in this thread. I'm afraid my lips are sealed.

Edited: Crap!!! >:|

[HitAttetlyTek]

I know, hence the irritated brief exclamatory at the end of the message.

Also known, I think, in grammar as an "ejaculation".