Oops their pissed.
 

Dang the misfortune Goldman Sachs Intends Little Neighborhood Bank For Bank With OWS Protestorshttp://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f297d9...6%3Fs%3D64&r=G Published on November 2, 2011 by Gekko http://www.moneytrendsresearch.com/w...yd_250x250.jpg A week ago, Democracy Now! and The Guardian ran our story about Goldman Sachs pulling financial assistance from the neighborhood credit union for praising among its biggest clients. The customer: Inhabit Wall Street. Our statement therefore angered Goldman that, within times, it doubled down on its assault on the small group bank. Goldman had already demanded the reunite of its $5,000 cost to the Low East Side Peoples Federal Credit Union. Today, resources say, the trillion-dollar Wall Street mega-bank delivered the next communication to the not-for-profit group bank: 'You'll never obtain a cent from any bank again .' About these 'dimes' Goldman is getting away: They originate from you and me, the citizens who set up millions in to the Troubled Asset Recovery Plan (TARP), often referred to as the Financial Institution Bail-Out Fund. For Goldman to pull its $10 million from the TARP trough, Goldman had to alter from expense bank to commercial bank. This change makes Goldman susceptible to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and needs it by law to cover straight back a significant part in resources for low-income areas, forgotten by the large banks. Quite simply, Goldman is whipping up Lower East Side Peoples (which works in Harlem and the Latino Ny neighbor hood referred to as Loisaida). The Credit Union's Chairwoman explained that, 'We've perhaps not drawn a line in the mud with Goldman Sachs.' The city bank doesn't wish to visit war with Goldman. The lender mentioned, following a original publishing of the statement, 'The Low East Side People's Federal Credit Union want to explain that it generally does not consider it self 'at war' with Goldman Sachs or some other lender. The Credit Union hasn't received any more communication from Goldman since its determination to withdraw its support from the fundraising event to observe our 25th Anniversary.' The City Bank really wants to stress its years of work helping low-income areas. The purpose within their honoring Occupy Wall Street isn't to strike Goldman states Chairwoman Deyarina Del Rio, but to identify that the Credit Union and the protestors, 'reveal an idea ' of placing people before profits. I'd notice that Goldman's unpleasant threat to stop money for Peoples, the credit union that's formally chartered whilst the lender for low income New Yorkers, included a problem about any of it writer. Goldman states that Greg Palast named just one time for you to get Goldman's part of the story. times were called many by me, as did my affiliate, and we left the same recurring message: I want your part of the story. Please contact me and tell me in the event that you are hitting poor people individuals' bank simply because they are supporting the needs of Occupy Wall Street?) You will find hundreds of vast amounts of dollars at risk locally Reinvestment resources due from the large banks. As other banks are making sounds of heeding Goldman's call to mix the uppity small credit marriage, a solution from Goldman becomes immediate. Therefore, Goldman, I'm still awaiting a solution. My numbers have been got by you, therefore just get a phone and tentacle. Source