LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-31-2012, 04:14 PM   #1
maliboia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default The Hobbit, now a trilogy
This will give them plenty of time to explore how the dwarves go about getting drunk and rattling plates. Something Tolkien was extremely deficient in explaining ... also we'll get to experience the barrel ride in real time first person perspective
maliboia is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 04:24 PM   #2
lalffibra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
This is ridiculous. From what I remember (it's been many years), The Hobbit is a book that takes an afternoon to read, at best.
lalffibra is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 04:42 PM   #3
55TRATTERENRY

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Bullshit, Lori. That book didn't even require one movie.
55TRATTERENRY is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 04:52 PM   #4
seodiary

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
Is there really enough story to make Part II of the III even close to interesting?
seodiary is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 05:07 PM   #5
cigattIcTot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
In the article I read, Jackson stated he was given access to a couple hundred pages of unpublished material and that if he didn't use it now, it may never be seen.
cigattIcTot is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 06:21 PM   #6
GSgCGxsF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
I've seen the words "unpublished appendices" a lot. It's likely just the published appendices, and the reporters are lazy and ignorant.
GSgCGxsF is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 06:35 PM   #7
Msrwbdas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
How dare you suggest anything Tolkien could suck! Why, I would read his toilet paper!
I heard that was published as part of the Similarion.
Msrwbdas is offline


Old 07-31-2012, 07:21 PM   #8
marketheal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
You apparently didn't read the 12 volume History of Middle Earth.

JM
(I read the Similarion over 3 times.)
marketheal is offline


Old 08-01-2012, 10:55 AM   #9
staisacic

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
If I'm correct The Hobbit has many spectacular action, described quite briefly. A chapter is an adventure. Not like LOTR, where everything is spread out a lot more.
Peter Jackson is not going to film only The Hobbit, but also the Appendices and extra material. And he's going to invent a bridge between The Hobbit and LOTR.

I'm not worried at all. I'm looking forward to 3 cool movies and I'm fine if they differ a bit or a lot from the books, as long as the movies are good.
LOTR could have been 12 movies, they chopped a lot.

I'm also looking forward to the 48fps 3D, I hope it'll do a lot to watching films and 3D.
All I'm hoping is that not something like the green goo that captured Minas Tirith in ROTK will re-appear. It was the very worst scene of LOTR and it almost ruined ROTK for me.
staisacic is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity