DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Oxford Comma (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50611)

KellyMP 07-16-2011 09:51 AM

Oxford Comma
 
!

niemamczasu 07-16-2011 12:44 PM

Invalid poll!

TimoDass 07-16-2011 01:08 PM

WAIT FOR THE POLE!

irresseni 07-16-2011 03:03 PM

How could you fools possibly vote yes?

Ruilnasr 07-16-2011 05:00 PM

Had to look into Wiki to get what this is about. In Kraut normally it's uncommon, but my presence in the anglophone net sphere has kinda brainwashed me to use it myself http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/frown.gif

twinaircant 07-16-2011 05:25 PM

No, no and no.

Mr_White 07-16-2011 05:36 PM

Whichever produces the least ambiguous sentence.

omaculer 07-16-2011 07:36 PM

People who refuse to use the Oxford comma are undoubtedly illbred, boorish, and retarded.

Gscvbhhv 07-16-2011 09:31 PM

Explicitly forbidden in Russian. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

KuevDulin 07-16-2011 10:43 PM

The Oxford Comma is the only unambiguous way to make a list.

Consider the classic example:
To my parents, Ayn Rand and God. This could mean two very different things, sans Oxford Comma.

pharmablogger 07-16-2011 10:47 PM

I usually write "X, Y, and Z" rather then X, Y and Z"

viagra-kaufen 07-16-2011 10:48 PM

I still think it's an invalid poll.

Gilowero 07-16-2011 11:51 PM

;

mirex 07-17-2011 12:04 AM

Interesting bunch of people agreeing. Me, Asher, Slowwy, and Oerdin all on the same side.

Depolit 07-17-2011 12:10 AM

Crap. Anything that Ben AND Oerdin agree on must be the wrongest thing ever... like a Platonic form of wrong-ness

zdoppiklonikaa 07-17-2011 12:15 AM

Quote:

What ever gave you the impression that I'm a Randian?
The opportunity was too good to pass up. "My parents, Ayn Rand and God" is as though Ayn Rand is substituted for Mary as the mother of Jesus. Considering the recent debate in the other thread about your (and Dave Floyd's) claims of the capitalist underpinnings of the Gospel, I thought alluding to your Capitalist Jesus™ in this instance was a good opportunity.

It is not to be taken literally. It was an attempt at humor.

u8MmZFmF 07-17-2011 12:19 AM

Quote:

Only a retard like Albert would think it means Ayn Rand is your mother.

Also, you could just rearrange the order. "To Ayn Rand, my parents and God". What is so difficult about that?

edit: hey, I just found a counterexample on Wikipedia. "To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God". Sounds like a rather ambiguous way to make lists.
The counterexample is stupid because that is not a list. It was a poor stylistic choice better serviced by paranthesis.

Bemapayople 07-17-2011 12:30 AM

It is not to be taken literally. It was an attempt at humor. I did laugh, but wanted to be sure that was the intent. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.gif You're not the first who's said that btw.

OccumCymn 07-17-2011 01:02 AM

Quote:

Crap. Anything that Ben AND Oerdin agree on must be the wrongest thing ever... like a Platonic form of wrong-ness
Wrongest?

taesrom 07-17-2011 01:57 AM

Quote:

It's simply a poor stylistic choice. It's not a list because there's not three distinct items in that quote.

"To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God"
Should obviously be:
"To my mother (Ayn Rand) and God"
or:
"To God and my mother, Ayn Rand"

An Oxford Comma is only to be used when there are three or more items in a list. What? Ayn Rand, your mother and God are three different things. But if you use the Oxford comma then it looks like two different things because Oxford commas are stupid.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2