LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-12-2011, 02:09 PM   #21
Jalieteplalry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
I was clarifying a point. However it now makes me think....Pakistan isn't an ally?
Jalieteplalry is offline


Old 06-12-2011, 05:19 PM   #22
DoroKickcrofe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
I think part of the larger problem is that we have troops stationed all over the world, the original purpose to box in the Soviets. There are no Soviets anymore, but our troops remain. Every problem looks like a nail. Were we to demilitarize around the globe, it would not be so easy to launch wars willy-nilly, and we'd spend less of our rapidly diminishing money, and our unending supply of blood.


It would also eliminate free-riding.
DoroKickcrofe is offline


Old 06-12-2011, 09:02 PM   #23
Erossycuc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
Probably not for the world, but definitely for the US.
Erossycuc is offline


Old 06-12-2011, 10:44 PM   #24
ensuppono

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Probably not for the world, but definitely for the US.
Friendly fire deaths would go down for your allies. So there is a win for them too.
ensuppono is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:14 AM   #25
dubGucKcolo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Friendly fire deaths would go down for your allies. So there is a win for them too.

Free-riding on US defense expenditures is far more valuable.
dubGucKcolo is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:16 AM   #26
7kitthuptarill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
Only if you assume that Europe could have maintained the same low levels of defense spending without the security guarantee provided for decades by the United States.
7kitthuptarill is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:20 AM   #27
beepbeet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
You didn't specify.
beepbeet is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:21 AM   #28
kranskregyan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
Well, in the present, the benefits to Europe aren't negligible since the US is largely funding and carrying out operations in Libya.
kranskregyan is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:23 AM   #29
Frinzer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
US makes a lot of defence procurement orders from Europe. And vice versa. Those would probably have more impact if they stopped.
Frinzer is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:24 AM   #30
I9dydJrX

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default
He's mad that Europeans have said a decade is long enough for Afghanistan so he's trying to brow beat them into staying another decade. It won't work.
I9dydJrX is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 12:26 AM   #31
TZids16I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
Well, in the present, the benefits to Europe aren't negligible since the US is largely funding and carrying out operations in Libya.
I thought Euro aircraft were performing most of the sorties? All we've done is give them bombs and drones.
TZids16I is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 07:12 AM   #32
Kdgjhytiy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
The US has admirably devoted several video game pilots back in Nevada to fly drones around, whilst they complain about no one else getting their hands dirty.
Drone piloting does get your hands dirty, especially if the last person at the controls was eating a donut.
Kdgjhytiy is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 01:40 PM   #33
Meenepek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Meenepek is offline


Old 06-13-2011, 03:36 PM   #34
offinoNem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
He knows how to leave a job with style.
offinoNem is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity