DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Robert Gates on NATO (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51330)

ansarigf 06-10-2011 03:47 PM

Robert Gates on NATO
 
It is pretty pathetic that France and the UK, permanent members of the Security Council, can barely sustain a combined bombing campaign against a North African dictatorship.

Nothatspecial 06-10-2011 05:57 PM

Quote:

It is pretty pathetic that France and the UK, permanent members of the Security Council, can barely sustain a combined bombing campaign against a North African dictatorship.
FWIW, I think Russia and China would do an even worse job.

TriammaMade 06-10-2011 06:19 PM

Russia and China aren't nearly as close to North Africa as the Brits and French are.

onlineslotetes 06-10-2011 06:26 PM

Georgia? That would be like a French invasion of Belgium. They'd have no problem with that.

Srewxardsasv 06-10-2011 06:29 PM

Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.

Nautilus 06-10-2011 07:05 PM

The US defence secretary, Robert Gates, has delivered a blistering attack on European defence complacency, declaring that Nato has become a "two-tiered" alliance of those willing to wage war and those only interested in "talking" and peacekeeping. It's a sad indictment of the US when they're whining that no one else is "willing" to wage war and is more interested in peacekeeping.

I'd say this thread backfired from the very first quote, to anyone reasonable.

BTW, remind me which countries are not involved with the Libya actions right now?

shinesw 06-10-2011 07:14 PM

And the shots at Europe from a country that couldn't defeat North Vietnam, took 10 years to kill a hermit, and still struggles in Iraq is amusing considering the difference in scale of the militaries.

peemovvie 06-10-2011 07:26 PM

Why didn't the US occupy North Vietnam? I've never understood that.

Evelinessa 06-10-2011 08:52 PM

Quote:

And the shots at Europe from a country that couldn't defeat North Vietnam, took 10 years to kill a hermit, and still struggles in Iraq is amusing considering the difference in scale of the militaries.
18 consecutive years of Stanley cup winning and counting http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

Metalhead 06-10-2011 11:01 PM

Quote:

18+ years of Stanley cup winning and counting http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif
Canadian spies winning the cup still counts for Canada.

JorgiOLusinio 06-10-2011 11:03 PM

Quote:

Canadian spies winning the cup still counts for Canada.
We import a lot of things.

RuttyUttepe 06-11-2011 02:06 AM

deja vu?

CathBraun 06-11-2011 04:55 AM

Cort Haus http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

DoctorIrokezov 06-11-2011 03:17 PM

Quote:

It's a sad indictment of the US when they're whining that no one else is "willing" to wage war and is more interested in peacekeeping.

I'd say this thread backfired from the very first quote, to anyone reasonable.
QFT

lungumnentibe 06-11-2011 05:28 PM

When the war is instigated by our allies, it'd be real nice to see them fight it without needing to bring us into it.

EvonsRorgon 06-11-2011 05:38 PM

What Drake said. We appreciate the help we've been given, but we're capable of fighting our wars without allied assistance. Britain and France can't make that claim.

leahjhburton 06-11-2011 06:19 PM

Quote:

If the US didn't want to help in Libya, they could do what they did then.
Pull the plug. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

Michaelnewerb 06-11-2011 07:08 PM

What did NATO ever do for us? Disband it already see if I care.

jenilopaz 06-11-2011 08:03 PM

Quote:

Of course it is. Only Australia, Canada, France, and the UK can really offer anything in a fight, and even they have very real limitations, as is being shown in Libya.
Every developed country can mount a credible defense.
That few are able to conduct interventions abroad is a damn
good thing.

PrareeLor 06-12-2011 05:19 AM

You think a nuclear deterrent isn't credible?

Or are you referring to the "any developed country" bit?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2