I GOTZ A QUESTION!! - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**anolbom** · 06-10-2011, 08:20 AM

Republican politicians receive money from corporations but not so much from unions.

**Freefspruptpx** · 06-10-2011, 09:43 AM

Owners have a say in the political donations of their companies.

Workers have little to to say in the political donations of their unions, which is especially poigniant given the money flow.

**Valdoyes** · 06-10-2011, 06:06 PM

Why do Republicans favor unlimited corporation election funds for politicians but want to limit union election funds?

Freedom of speech.

Union election funds should be limited because you don't have a choice to pay them and because it's basically swiping money from the taxpayer to elect democrats.

You're retarded if you can't see this immediately. But we all already know you're not very smart.

**Hofonom** · 06-10-2011, 06:16 PM

Irrelevant.

**erelvenewmeva** · 06-10-2011, 06:18 PM

For the record, I don't think there should be limits on what unions spend as campaign contributions. I think that forcing people to pay union dues should be banned.

**bribiaLaubysdggf** · 06-10-2011, 06:20 PM

Yeah, I remember it was a discussion that you LOST. Miserably.

**bikersfan** · 06-10-2011, 06:23 PM

gribbler, if that's your total argument, you're failing.

**RobertLS** · 06-10-2011, 06:50 PM

Why do Republicans favor unlimited corporation election funds for politicians but want to limit union election funds?

well as most Republicans are in the south, they want to limit the union funding as it defeated them in a war during 19th century, and as corporations are opposing the union, it is very natural that they support them. Freedom from Union oppression!

Also there is a good chance is the corporations win, they will re-introduce slavery, so it is a win-win scenario.

**AdipexAdipex** · 06-10-2011, 07:01 PM

Union election funds should be limited because you don't have a choice to pay them and because it's basically swiping money from the taxpayer to elect democrats.

You're retarded, if you believe this.

**Joesred** · 06-10-2011, 07:23 PM

Almost at very end of this video, Maddow talks about how Tennessee allows corporations to make campaign donations, but prohibits unions from doing the same thing.

**unishisse** · 06-10-2011, 07:24 PM

Please don't quote him

I is sorry.

**fedelwfget** · 06-10-2011, 07:32 PM

There - I found the text in the full embedded text that I needed to delete.

**milfovoxapl** · 06-10-2011, 09:26 PM

Okay so Maddow over simplified the issue.

06-10-2011, 08:20 AM	#1
anolbom Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	I GOTZ A QUESTION!! Republican politicians receive money from corporations but not so much from unions. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 09:43 AM	#2
Freefspruptpx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 469 Senior Member	Owners have a say in the political donations of their companies. Workers have little to to say in the political donations of their unions, which is especially poigniant given the money flow. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:06 PM	#3
Valdoyes Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	Why do Republicans favor unlimited corporation election funds for politicians but want to limit union election funds? Freedom of speech. Union election funds should be limited because you don't have a choice to pay them and because it's basically swiping money from the taxpayer to elect democrats. You're retarded if you can't see this immediately. But we all already know you're not very smart. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:16 PM	#4
Hofonom Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 364 Senior Member	Irrelevant. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:18 PM	#5
erelvenewmeva Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 540 Senior Member	For the record, I don't think there should be limits on what unions spend as campaign contributions. I think that forcing people to pay union dues should be banned. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:20 PM	#6
bribiaLaubysdggf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 536 Senior Member	Yeah, I remember it was a discussion that you LOST. Miserably. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:23 PM	#7
bikersfan Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 390 Senior Member	gribbler, if that's your total argument, you're failing. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 06:50 PM	#8
RobertLS Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 479 Senior Member	Why do Republicans favor unlimited corporation election funds for politicians but want to limit union election funds? well as most Republicans are in the south, they want to limit the union funding as it defeated them in a war during 19th century, and as corporations are opposing the union, it is very natural that they support them. Freedom from Union oppression! Also there is a good chance is the corporations win, they will re-introduce slavery, so it is a win-win scenario. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 07:01 PM	#9
AdipexAdipex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	Union election funds should be limited because you don't have a choice to pay them and because it's basically swiping money from the taxpayer to elect democrats. You're retarded, if you believe this. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 07:23 PM	#10
Joesred Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 481 Senior Member	Almost at very end of this video, Maddow talks about how Tennessee allows corporations to make campaign donations, but prohibits unions from doing the same thing. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 07:24 PM	#11
unishisse Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 431 Senior Member	Please don't quote him I is sorry. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 07:32 PM	#12
fedelwfget Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 411 Senior Member	There - I found the text in the full embedded text that I needed to delete. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2011, 09:26 PM	#13
milfovoxapl Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 563 Senior Member	Okay so Maddow over simplified the issue. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)