DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Scientists trying to clone, resurrect extinct mammoth (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96479)

Shipsyspeepay 01-18-2011 04:28 AM

Quote:

Okay, so what was the point you were making?
pig and elephant dna just won't splice.

risyGreeple 01-18-2011 07:53 PM

They basically wiped out the megafauna every where which didn't co-evolve with men and thus learn to fear men.

Ladbarbastirm 01-19-2011 03:41 AM

They basically wiped out the megafauna every where which didn't co-evolve with men and thus learn to fear men.


This theory makes no sense, when you actually think about it.

Sandvikla 01-19-2011 12:30 PM

Yah, mammoths don't move very fast. Even when moving at glacial speeds you can often catch them.

Dogxzysl 01-19-2011 01:13 PM

Quote:

Yah, mammoths don't move very fast. Even when moving at glacial speeds you can often catch them.
It would take a RPG to bring down one.
Are we to except that they were done in by spears and bow/arrow?

sarasmid 01-19-2011 04:38 PM

Quote:

It makes perfect sense and is widely documented. Many animals are pretty tame and don't run from humans, this makes them easy to hunt because they just stand there and don't run away as a hunter creeps up on them.
Cite, please. "This is new and strange to me; I'll just assume it's safe and ignore it" is the dumbest survival instinct imaginable, except perhaps "Ooh, a bright, hot red light in the forest! I'd better lie down and go to sleep." Any wild animal that tamely walked up to strange animals would find itself very quickly removed from the population.

Try an experiment. Do you have a dog, or a friend with a dog? Get yourself a dinky little windup toy, crank it up and put it on the floor with the dog. What do you think will happen?

Spoiler: The dog will, nine times out of ten, react to the new organism by backing up and barking at it furiously. It has no reason to fear the stupid thing except that it is moving and making noise, and therefore a strange organism. After it has been doing its thing for a while, or if it winds down and stops, the dog will approach, very cautiously, and make timid sniffs to try and figure it out. This will work equally well for great danes and chihuahuas, except the chihuahua will bark a lot longer because it knows, deep in its neurotic soul, that it's too pathetic for anything to ever be really afraid of it.

If you try this with a cat, of course, the cat will simply pounce on it and try to kill it, because cats are hardwired to annihilate anything smaller or weaker than themselves. They're jerks that way. If my cat were bigger than me, it would murder me as soon as I moved too fast and to hell with affection, purely by instinct. But they certainly won't ignore it.

And that's with domesticated animals, creatures bred for docility who've rarely, if ever, faced a real threat in their lives. Wild animals will react in a similar but exaggerated way to novel creatures, as a general rule. Species which do not mistrust humans instinctively, like Allegheny cliff rats, are few and far between. Oh, and if we're talking about herd animals--like mammoths, in all likelihood--they'll learn to distrust humans pretty quickly when Ook-Ook and D'leh start bringing down their herdmates.

PemiaGefe 01-19-2011 09:25 PM

Megafauna went extinct worldwide, not just in the Americas. No cave bears/lions, no dire wolves, no mammoths. With rare exceptions like the aurochs, which survived into the 1600s or thereabouts, they all died off. Whether this was a result of human hunting, the end of the ice age, or both, is a matter of scientific debate.

Nakforappealp 01-19-2011 09:44 PM

Quote:

Megafauna went extinct worldwide, not just in the Americas. No cave bears/lions, no dire wolves, no mammoths. With rare exceptions like the aurochs, which survived into the 1600s or thereabouts, they all died off. Whether this was a result of human hunting, the end of the ice age, or both, is a matter of scientific debate.
Hm?

Elephants, Rhinoceroses (? Rhinoceri? http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/wink.gif ), Hippos...

apatteopipt 01-19-2011 09:54 PM

There's also elephants in India. There was also megafauna in south america, which wasn't very much affected by the ice age...

BoarmomorurrY 01-19-2011 10:23 PM

Climate change clearly played a huge role. I could be wrong but I don't think the climate of Sub-Saharan Africa or South America changed much at all after the Ice Age, compared to the large-scale changes that occurred in Northern Eurasia and North America where species of megafauna went extinct in large numbers.

zdoppiklonikaa 01-19-2011 11:11 PM

Quote:

Climate change clearly played a huge role. I could be wrong but I don't think the climate of Sub-Saharan Africa or South America changed much at all after the Ice Age, compared to the large-scale changes that occurred in Northern Eurasia and North America where species of megafauna went extinct in large numbers.
But there were extintions in South America too, and the climate here didn't change as much as in the north.

In any case, the world got warmer... I can see the more cold-adapted species being really at a disadvantage, but the tropical and temperate species just saw their ecosystems expand.

Penisvergroesserung 01-20-2011 12:34 AM

Quote:

Climate change clearly played a huge role. I could be wrong but I don't think the climate of Sub-Saharan Africa or South America changed much at all after the Ice Age, compared to the large-scale changes that occurred in Northern Eurasia and North America where species of megafauna went extinct in large numbers.
Flu wiped them out.

HugoSimon 01-20-2011 02:49 AM

Quote:

Cite, please. "This is new and strange to me; I'll just assume it's safe and ignore it" is the dumbest survival instinct imaginable, except perhaps "Ooh, a bright, hot red light in the forest! I'd better lie down and go to sleep." Any wild animal that tamely walked up to strange animals would find itself very quickly removed from the population. ...

Oh, and if we're talking about herd animals--like mammoths, in all likelihood--they'll learn to distrust humans pretty quickly when Ook-Ook and D'leh start bringing down their herdmates.
http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

I take back almost everything bad I ever said about you.

limpoporanique 01-20-2011 04:36 AM

Quote:

http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

I take back almost everything bad I ever said about you.
Almost, eh? You just can't forgive me for bashing "Something," I take it...

vNGiDaFX 01-20-2011 05:06 AM

No, the only thing I still hate him for is thinking that Africa is farther from Japan than the waters off Antarctica.

overavantstandard 01-20-2011 05:56 AM

Quote:

No, the only thing I still hate him for is thinking that Africa is farther from Japan than the waters off Antarctica.
I don't get it. Comparing the distances from South Africa to Antarctica and from Somalia to Japan, I'm pretty sure Africa is much closer to the waters off Antarctica.

indianstory 01-20-2011 07:53 AM

Quote:

It doesn't make a damn bit of sense unless you assume a herd of mammoths is too ****ing stupid to realize that humans are dangerous after the first of their number gets speared to death.

I won't even get into seeming support of Lamarckism.
Elephants came from Eurasia and Africa, Drake. If you want some details then read some Jerrod Diamond and look up some of his citations because he discusses megafauna extinction in both G,G,&S and in Collapse.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2