Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#41 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
|
He's got two major wins- majors is what most judge a 'great' golfer by. But golf sucks anyway. fucking waste of time and money. Driving ranges are cool though. |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
|
Dude, there is middle ground between "sucks" and "Most excellent all-time golf god." My fondest memory of Norman was him stealing defeat out of the jaws of victory. That sucked. I've always thought Norman was more hype ('The Shark') than he could live up to. John Daly, IMO, fell apart due to his weight and addictions...he was also more ad/promo hype than he could live up to. |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
|
Because i'm not a Philly-sheeple, fat-Phil (Mickelson) fan?? Edit: And by the way, that Philly stuff you bring up is weak. I think I have been one of the few Philly posters who hasn't given you a ton of shit. |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
|
Maybe 'sucks' is the wrong term. It's what came to mind when i first posted. If had said 'Norman is a choker', there'd be little argument. It is very notable that for all his talent, he's fallen short so often in pressure situations. However, a comparable statement would be saying that Patrick Ewing sucks at basketball, because he's not Jordan/Wilt/Bird. |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
|
Tiger is one of 3 superior players all time in Golf. |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
|
Whiskey got it right. You said Norman "sucks." Even with all his trouble finishing at majors, the guy was the dominant player on the tour for a number of years. He is one of the top ten players from 1980 through today. But evidently you wanna belabor this topic. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
|
I didn't say that. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|