DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   Golf (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=50)
-   -   How many does it take? (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220641)

+++Poguru+++ 03-27-2009 06:52 PM

How many does it take?
 
I found this and had to share:

How many golf forum members does it takes to book a tee time?

  • 1 to book the tee time and to post that the tee time has been booked
  • 14 to share similar experiences of booking tee times and how the tee times could have been booked differently
  • 7 to caution about the pitfalls of booking tee times
  • 1 to move the topic to the "General Discussion" section
  • 2 to argue the move and then lobby to move it to the "Golf Travel" section
  • 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about booking tee times
  • 5 to flame the spell checkers
  • 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
  • 6 to argue over whether it's "tee time" or "teetime" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
  • 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "reservation"
  • 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "tee time" is perfectly correct
  • 19 to post that this forum is not about booking reservations and to please take this discussion to a hotel or vacation forum
  • 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use reservations (tee times) and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
  • 36 to debate which method of booking tee times is superior, how to get the best tee times, what tee times are best for most golfers and what tee times to avoid
  • 7 to post URL's where one can book tee times
  • 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
  • 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes tee times relevant to this group
  • 13 to "quote" all posts to date, and do so in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and then add: "Me too"
  • 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the "tee time controversy"
  • 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
  • 13 to say "do a Google search on tee times before posting questions about tee times"
  • 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

Toninvell 03-27-2009 06:59 PM

That is hysterical.

lizadax 03-27-2009 07:00 PM

Great one Smalls.http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/laugh.png

blogwado 03-27-2009 08:11 PM

LOL! that was hilarious Smalls

venediene 03-27-2009 08:35 PM

That's just about spot on. I'll repost my response in about 3 months. http://www.thehackersparadise.com/fo...ilies/wink.png

Wrencytet 03-28-2009 02:45 AM

Quote:

I found this and had to share:

How many golf forum members does it takes to book a tee time?

  • 1 to book the tee time and to post that the tee time has been booked
  • 14 to share similar experiences of booking tee times and how the tee times could have been booked differently
  • 7 to caution about the pitfalls of booking tee times
  • 1 to move the topic to the “General Discussion” section
  • 2 to argue the move and then lobby to move it to the “Golf Travel” section
  • 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about booking tee times
  • 5 to flame the spell checkers
  • 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
  • 6 to argue over whether it's "tee time" or "teetime" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
  • 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "reservation"
  • 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "tee time" is perfectly correct
  • 19 to post that this forum is not about booking reservations and to please take this discussion to a hotel or vacation forum
  • 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use reservations (tee times) and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
  • 36 to debate which method of booking tee times is superior, how to get the best tee times, what tee times are best for most golfers and what tee times to avoid
  • 7 to post URL's where one can book tee times
  • 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
  • 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes tee times relevant to this group
  • 13 to "quote" all posts to date, and do so in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and then add: "Me too"
  • 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the “tee time controversy”
  • 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
  • 13 to say "do a Google search on tee times before posting questions about tee times"
  • 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

Haha, that's great stuff there Smalls.

Grewlybreekly 03-28-2009 02:51 AM

LMAO, good one Smalls

heltduell 03-28-2009 03:05 AM

Quote:

I found this and had to share:

How many golf forum members does it takes to book a tee time?

  • 1 to book the tee time and to post that the tee time has been booked
  • 14 to share similar experiences of booking tee times and how the tee times could have been booked differently
  • 7 to caution about the pitfalls of booking tee times
  • 1 to move the topic to the “General Discussion” section
  • 2 to argue the move and then lobby to move it to the “Golf Travel” section
  • 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about booking tee times
  • 5 to flame the spell checkers
  • 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
  • 6 to argue over whether it's "tee time" or "teetime" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
  • 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "reservation"
  • 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "tee time" is perfectly correct
  • 19 to post that this forum is not about booking reservations and to please take this discussion to a hotel or vacation forum
  • 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use reservations (tee times) and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
  • 36 to debate which method of booking tee times is superior, how to get the best tee times, what tee times are best for most golfers and what tee times to avoid
  • 7 to post URL's where one can book tee times
  • 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
  • 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes tee times relevant to this group
  • 13 to "quote" all posts to date, and do so in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and then add: "Me too"
  • 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the “tee time controversy”
  • 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
  • 13 to say "do a Google search on tee times before posting questions about tee times"
  • 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

Quote:

That is hysterical.
Quote:

LOL! that was hilarious Smalls
Quote:

That's just about spot on. I'll repost my response in about 3 months. http://www.thehackersparadise.com/fo...ilies/wink.png
Quote:

Haha, that's great stuff there Smalls.
Quote:

LMAO, good one Smalls
Me too.

zdoppiklonikaa 03-28-2009 04:43 AM

Is this an exercise in how many multiposts we can string together?

Oppofeescom 03-28-2009 04:44 AM

Quote:

Is this an exercise in how many multiposts we can string together?
Yes, and you failed.

Grewlybreekly 03-28-2009 04:45 AM

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about booking tee times Your turn is coming Claire, just wait for somebody to make a grammatical error. Just keep checking back, it's bound to happen.

zdoppiklonikaa 03-28-2009 04:52 AM

Quote:

Yes, and you failed.
Quote:

Your turn is coming Claire, just wait for somebody to make a grammatical error. Just keep checking back, it's bound to happen.
But, but--I'm already a failure!

(I did think about jumping up and waving my hand at that one. Then I thought again.)

+++Poguru+++ 07-07-2010 07:05 AM

Quote:

I found this and had to share:

How many golf forum members does it takes to book a tee time?

  • 1 to book the tee time and to post that the tee time has been booked
  • 14 to share similar experiences of booking tee times and how the tee times could have been booked differently
  • 7 to caution about the pitfalls of booking tee times
  • 1 to move the topic to the “General Discussion” section
  • 2 to argue the move and then lobby to move it to the “Golf Travel” section
  • 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about booking tee times
  • 5 to flame the spell checkers
  • 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
  • 6 to argue over whether it's "tee time" or "teetime" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
  • 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "reservation"
  • 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "tee time" is perfectly correct
  • 19 to post that this forum is not about booking reservations and to please take this discussion to a hotel or vacation forum
  • 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use reservations (tee times) and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
  • 36 to debate which method of booking tee times is superior, how to get the best tee times, what tee times are best for most golfers and what tee times to avoid
  • 7 to post URL's where one can book tee times
  • 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
  • 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes tee times relevant to this group
  • 13 to "quote" all posts to date, and do so in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and then add: "Me too"
  • 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the “tee time controversy”
  • 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
  • 13 to say "do a Google search on tee times before posting questions about tee times"
  • 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

Well, it took longer than 6 months!

Usendyduexy 07-07-2010 07:11 AM

LOL Thats great smalls

Trissinas 07-07-2010 07:38 AM

I love that last one. It usually holds very true!

Bridgester 07-07-2010 08:15 AM

And a partridge in a pear tree……I could have waited till Christmas time to post but that would have made me the infamous “6 month lurker”

Breeriacoirl 07-08-2010 12:32 AM

Good one especially to someone new to your forum.

DP5Ups8o 07-08-2010 12:48 AM

lmao!!

Nadin Maison 07-08-2010 12:52 AM

Google it! http://www.thehackersparadise.com/fo...ies/act-up.png

23InetrySypekek 07-08-2010 06:02 AM

Lol soo true.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2