![]() |
Quote:
|
The 1959 Challenge: modern clubs vs. antiques
This is from the 50th Anniversary Edition of Golf magazine. They compared Paddy's clubs versus clubs from 1959. He was at a range at TPC Sawgrass. All shots were measured with a Trackman. They state he was hitting into a 10 to 15 mph wind. All shots were hit with modern balls, i.e. "multilayer construction wiht a urethane cover"
Drivers: Wilson Smooth, 9*, 45", extra stiff shaft vs. Persimmon, 7.5*, 43 3/8, regular flex shaft Smooth Club Speed = 112.8 mph Ball Speed = 169.2 mph Smash Factor = 1.50 Launch Angle = 12.1* Spin Rate = 2,527 Maximum Height = 43.5 yards Carry = 254.5 yards Total Length = 265.3 yards Persimmon Club Speed = 105.4 mph Ball Speed = 157.1 mph Smash Factor = 1.49 Launch Angle = 11.5* Spin Rate = 1,690 Maximum Height = 27.2 yards Carry = 228.3 yards Total Length = 259.4 yards The 6 iron comparison Wilson Staff Pi5, 31*, 37", Extra stiff flex Wilson Dyna-Powered, 36*, 36.5", Regular flex Pi5 Club Speed = 88.7 mph Ball Speed = 127.2 mph Smash Factor = 1.46 Launch Angle = 14.3* Spin Rate = 5,463 Maximum Height = 35.8 yards Carry = 166.1 yards Total Length = 167.3 yards Dyna-Powered Club Speed = 84.2 mph Ball Speed = 118.0 mph Smash Factor = 1.40 Launch Angle = 17.1* Spin Rate = 6,654 Maximum Height = 34.1 yards Carry = 148.1 yards Total Length = 148.1 yards The 9 iron comparison Wilson Staff Pi5, 44*, 36", Extra stiff flex Wilson Dyna-Powered, 48*, 35", Regular flex Pi5 Club Speed = 80.3 mph Ball Speed = 106.0 mph Smash Factor = 1.32 Launch Angle = 23.1* Spin Rate = 8,084 Maximum Height = 34.8 yards Carry = 122.8 yards Total Length = 122.8 yards Dyna-Powered Club Speed = 75.0 mph Ball Speed = 93.0 mph Smash Factor = 1.24 Launch Angle = 25.6* Spin Rate = 8,804 Maximum Height = 29.4 yards Carry = 106.5 yards Total Length = 107.5 yards |
pretty interesting...
|
One question I do have is why was he using regular flex in the older irons?
|
It is interesting from the tour player perspective because they have very repeatable swings. However do these same tests with 10 handicap players and the results are drastically different. The OEM's have come a long with helping the average player get better with more forgiveness.
Also keep in mind that the modern ball is geared towards working with the modern club and vice versa. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I know that lofts in irons have been jacked up, so I'm wondering why they didn't compare an old 36* or 48* iron with a new 36* or 48* (or whatever's closest) iron. Of course the newer clubs will hit the ball longer - newer clubs have longer shafts and less loft.
It would have been nice to compare shot dispersion as well. |
Quote:
I'd also be interested to know what the numbers would have been if they'd conduct such a test using a c.1960 Balata ball with the new clubs and a modern ball with the old clubs. It's an interesting exercise and I'm not denying either the results or the implications. But as everyone knows, statistical data can be made to support or disclaim just about anything so as always, a grain of salt is in order. -JP |
Quote:
|
Just to throw in something interesting I occasionally put some old persimmon woody I found in an Edwin Watts in CA in the bag and will shock higher-handicap players when I hit it straight and pretty far too! Though in no way near as far or as consistent or with a draw like my ft-9. Plus even really, really pure and good shots still feel weird at impact, it almost kinda hurts in a way if that could explain it maybe?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2