DevaRextusidis |
02-10-2011 10:44 PM |
Quote:
I read your humour, but on a more serious note, I have worked with PR companies and if you pay them very well, there is nothing you have to do. In fact, as long as they are paid extremely well, they will find threads to investigate, do all the hard work, pull favours from others (their clients are also some media companies, bear in mind). So in reality, as long as Hazrat gives his approval to the scheme, there will be no need to consult Hazrat in nitty gritty matters. I really think this can work (I am generally very pessimistic), if we get someone like MCB or a very senior UK scholar to approve of the idea, and mosques start contributing funds, inshaAllah it may be bring some positive change.
|
http://discussworldissues.com/forums...es/wasalam.gif
The crux of the issue and something for which I keep getting banned is "Management" of Darul-uloom. Because of lack of adequate management;decisions are either not made, or made late or incorrectly made. At the heart of it, a Darululoom is an educational institute with boarding and it needs to be run professionally.
A Darul-Iftaa in our time is providing nothing but counselling so there are similarities on which we can draw and learn how they should be run.
Plenty of Boys boarding Schools get reported in the media (remember the Catholic Church issues with abuse?) so Darul-ulooms in that sense are no different. Catholic Church has done far worse (in reality) but are trying their best to handle the situation with PR and Legal input from experts.
Our Darul-ulooms & Ulama have generally done NOTHING wrong but are being let down because the Media knows that they are soft targets. So far I believe that the Media hasn’t really brought out any major skeletons YET.
Did you watch the HMC Fiasco 4-5 weeks ago on TV? HMC paid for a program on a Pakistani Channel and they got slated! I mean how bad can you get when you can't even get publicity after paying?
Quote:
We do, as a community, need to be proactive in these type of things. Many of our respected scholars encourage this and do say that if the Muslims do not step forth and take up positions in the community, tackle negativity and show by example that the stereotyping is only a minority position then those with prejudices against Islam will be the only ones who have their say.
The biggest hurdle they face is the backlash and lack of support from our own community. Every time someone engages in an unorthodox yet effective activity to portray Islam in a positive light then they are vilified for going against the norm even if there is nothing Islamicly wrong with the innovative method. Do you really think a Muslim making documentaries, giving interviews, allowing outsiders, heading campaigns in will be lauded by the community? Sofa critic Muslims from the community will be the first to stand up and condemn them. We need to change this attitude and realise that things need to be approached differently.
The second problem is that no matter what is said, quotes will always be taken out of context. I have been approached a number of times to give interviews about madaaris, Muslim sterotypes etc but the reluctance is due to mistrust. Unless we know how the end result is going to be portrayed, we will always have reservations.
|
And that's why you need official press releases to counter it (to some extent). Simple strategy.
Media shouldn't be coming to every Abdullah, Khalid & Aisha instead they should be directed to a central place which manages these matters coherently.
And you can't put this at the door step of community! They don't run Darul-ulooms and abolsutely no say in it whatsoever and they are very clearly told to, "BUG OUT!"... They just fund it with their money I am sure that you will never admit this...
|