Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
whle the revolution got success in egypt and on the contrary, Gaddafi managed to successfully ditcth the rebels which has made the west annoyed and they have now attaccked libya
so i can conclude that west was at the back of that, so called revolution in egypt as well. but at that place, they managed to get rid of husney mubarak any thoughts? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
whle the revolution got success in egypt and on the contrary, Gaddafi managed to successfully ditcth the rebels which has made the west annoyed and they have now attaccked libya ![]() Isn't it a bit much to think that all those boots on the ground were gotten out through the West's interference? besides, the West loved Mubarak, why would they dolchstoss him? He and his torture-drone Suleiman were doing a lot of nice work for them while keeping the people relatively politically docile, the occasional labor unrest notwithstanding. I don't see what sort of benefit they'd have to throwing him out of the window, especially now that the MB seems poised to sweep elections. For Libya though, I don't know what to think. I can't help but think that France recognized the transitional council because it's full of expat stooges who would sell out the country and continue Qaddafi's checks on refugees exiting Libya, since Sarkozy really doesn't like having to step over all the Muslim poor in Paris to get his morning croissants. And really, since when has anything that Sarkozy and his whacked-out ilk wanted been good for everyone else? But on the other hand, Qaddafi is insane, so... don't know what to think. I just make du'a. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
![]() I highly doubt Tunisia or Egypt were planned by the West. Both revolutions toppled very pro-West governments, and the people who stand to gain the most are exactly what the West is afraid of (i.e. Muslims). As for Libya, I could see the US taking advantage of the tension in the the Middle East to fabricate their own revolution. That, or they were able to implant their men quickly enough to have seemingly taken over the revolution. It's a depressing reality. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
well, mubarak was abt to die and he cudnt speak . He was aboout to "expire" before west came into action and put one of their strongest puppets in .. called ARMY, before any one could take over or situation gets out of hands of west. So, now west has time to tihnk ,plan and act for next 10 years .
Things in egypt are not settlled.. But media isnt showing any thing. They show as if they have acheived their objective but army is funded by west and its their Muppet and not islamic army. What do u think about that? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|