LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-18-2007, 08:17 PM   #1
chuviskkk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default Which matters most for weight loss?
I have a question about walking for weight loss. A friend of mine believes the theory of walking distance is what helps you lose weight best versus my theory that it is the speed at which you walk that matters. So, could you help me figure this one out? Which matters most in ultimate weight loss: speed or distance?
I have been so good at going walking every day.
chuviskkk is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 08:22 PM   #2
Muesrasrs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
it is a combination. It's all about calories burned. When I work out on the eliptical machine, I burn about 450 calories...I could burn the same amount walking for 2 hours...
Muesrasrs is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 11:27 PM   #3
nancywind

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
545
Senior Member
Default
Pretty much was breakfast said, it comes down to cals. Walking faster will yeild results quicker, mean it will burn cals faster. But you could essentially burn the same cals by walking twice as far or more. She needs to work at pace where it gets her heart rate up tho, just loafing around isnt going to help all that much.
nancywind is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 11:30 PM   #4
Kimmitmelvirm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
Don't forget your diet too. High fiber stuff and tons of water.

My doctor said that she's read studies saying that Aspartame actually makes you hungrier, so don't load up on diet sodas. Pile on the water!
Kimmitmelvirm is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 11:31 PM   #5
WGRocky

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
385
Senior Member
Default
Pretty much was breakfast said, it comes down to cals. Walking faster will yeild results quicker, mean it will burn cals faster. But you could essentially burn the same cals by walking twice as far or more. She needs to work at pace where it gets her heart rate up tho, just loafing around isnt going to help all that much.
The tricky part is, I already have problems with fast heartrate and I take Toprol to keep it from racing. Getting it pumping fast after working out shouldnt be a problem, would it? Being that its a different kind of heart racing ordeal.
WGRocky is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 11:36 PM   #6
gDGwm8BC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
eat healthy foods no junk in normal portions and exercise...walk jog run what ever just do it
gDGwm8BC is offline


Old 01-18-2007, 11:47 PM   #7
bubborn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Amy, I would talk to your doctor. Since you have problems with a high heart rate, you should check with him before you do anything super cardio, especially since you are on medication also...but as a general rule, here are the heartrate guidelines:

The Energy Efficient or Recovery Zone - 60% to 70%

Training within this zone develops basic endurance and aerobic capacity. All easy recovery running should be completed at a maximum of 70%. Another advantage to running in this zone is that while you are happily fat burning you may lose weight and you will be allowing your muscles to re-energise with glycogen, which has been expended during those faster paced work-outs. Check out the Fat burning zone page.
The Aerobic Zone - 70% to 80%

Training in this zone will develop your cardiovascular system. The body's ability to transport oxygen to, and carbon dioxide away from, the working muscles can be developed and improved. As you become fitter and stronger from training in this zone it will be possible to run some of your long weekend runs at up to 75%, so getting the benefits of some fat burning and improved aerobic capacity.
The Anaerobic Zone - 80% to 90%

Training in this zone will develop your lactic acid system. In this zone your individual anaerobic threshold is found - sometimes referred to the point of deflection (POD). During these heart rates the amount of fat being utilised as the main source of energy is greatly reduced and glycogen stored in the muscle is predominantly used. One of the by-products of burning this glycogen is the runners worst enemy, lactic acid. There is a point at which the body can no longer remove the lactic acid from the working muscles quickly enough. This happens at an individual heart rate for us all and is accompanied by a rapid rise in heart rate and a slowing of your running pace. This is your anaerobic threshold or POD. Through the correct training it is possible to delay the POD by being able to increase your ability to deal with the lactic acid for a longer period of time or by pushing the POD higher.
The Red Line Zone 90% to 100%

Training in this zone will only be possible for short periods of time. It effectively trains your fast twitch muscle fibres and helps to develop speed. This zone is reserved for interval running and only the very fit are able to train effectively within this zone.
bubborn is offline


Old 01-19-2007, 02:08 AM   #8
Babposa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Resistance training is also very important to losing weight. Muscle helps burn calories because your muscles require more energy to function than fat does to just chill. There's a formula that works for every one because it is based on your personal resting heart rate. I'll see if I can find it. I vaguely remember hearing from one of the ladies that works at my gym that if you go over a certain percent of your max heart rate then you're not in a fat burning zone anymore and you aren't going to help yourself lose weight. Something like that. I'll find the formula and post it later tonight.
Babposa is offline


Old 01-22-2007, 11:34 PM   #9
xgnuwdd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
if you run one mile or walk one mile you still burn about 100 calories regardless. the difference is it takes less time to run it than walk it so you can do more, thus burning more calories in the same amount of time.

lets say you walk for 30 minutes and walk 2 miles you burn 200 calories
but if you run for 30 minutes you run 4 miles you burn 400 calories
xgnuwdd is offline


Old 01-23-2007, 12:38 AM   #10
logpogingg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
but if you run for 30 minutes you run 4 miles you burn 400 calories
orrr you could be like me and not keep a steady pace for 30 minutes while running...that's a little difficult for me. I could run probably 3miles in 30, but not 4. That's super fast for me.
logpogingg is offline


Old 01-23-2007, 03:24 AM   #11
nushentelve

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
orrr you could be like me and not keep a steady pace for 30 minutes while running...that's a little difficult for me. I could run probably 3miles in 30, but not 4. That's super fast for me.
well I just made simple numbers, I couldnt run that either just an example
nushentelve is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity