Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
As I read a post about Florida's movement against APBT I thought that most here do not own APBTs because they do not have papers, are mutts, etc...but in this case then why not agree with BSL? Hell, in that case if papers are the only way of knowing I have never met an APBT and looked at papers? For all I know APBT ARE aggressive, violent creatures.
Further, why should I fight for a breed if my dog is discriminated against by many in the community? Isnt that the same thing the media is doing? Taking what they agree with and ignoring the rest? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
you have me confused girl... I am not snapping to what you are getting at....
papers do not mean a damn thing to most folks who are for BSL, if it LOOKS like what they think an APBT is, then, to them it IS an apbt... so not sure what you are saying.. and I hate to make fun of you when I am not sure what it is I am making fun of... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
you have me confused girl... I am not snapping to what you are getting at.... ---------- Post added at 10:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 AM ---------- Obed, feel free to edit my posting- its pre-coffee hour ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
My fight against BSL is not even really about a single breed per say. It is about my right to own a dog period. I don't see why or how the government should have any choice in the matter. If they pass BSL in Florida it will just fuel the fire to move on to MSN, anti teathering and whatever the hell else they feel like doing.
For me it is also a fight for my basic rights, without gov influence, as long as my dogs are kept within the animal welfare laws they should have no say. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Sorry I meant the community meaning the "pitbull" community. Meaning people who say that is not a pitbull *finger shake* because there are no papers, it is a mutt. Those who demand I dont call my dog a pitbull because that term only refers to the APBT, but at the same time the UKC refers to several breeds as pitbulls, it seems like an easy way of dividing the community if you ask me I will call my dog a giant egyptian chi if I want to.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
bostonitis, you went full retard, you never go full retard... ![]() ![]() ![]() ---------- Post added at 11:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 AM ---------- since when did you start caring what other folks think? |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
For me, it is about having a dog that is not a pit bull (I mean there could be one in her woodpile somewhere) but every time I take her somewhere someone asks if she is a pit bull. Her documentation all says "Boxer mix" but she fits the criteria of a pit bull and if someone wanted her gone, then I'd be screwed.
I also will be damned if I have to put a muzzle on her just because some asshole down the street can't be bothered to keep her stupid poodle dog on a leash or keep their cat contained. If the BSL said "APBT" then maybe I wouldn't be so concerned, but it doesn't. It is a generic "pit bull" and based on all that generic description, my dog falls into a category that may have restrictions unfairly placed on them. I just don't get why they would add more rules when they aren't enforcing the ones that already exist - specifically the leash law. Now you are making up a whole new group of lawbreakers when government in FL (especially our county) needs to have less issues to worry about since there is barely money to cover minimal services. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
you have me confused girl... I am not snapping to what you are getting at.... I think in 2005 the bill died, but it's technically...still out there. They don't care what "papers" say. If it looks like a Pit Bull, they're banning it. Same thing in counties that ban Pit Bulls now. People have tried passing dogs off as "Boxer mixes," etc. that they got from shelters, but if it looks like a Pit Bull, they're calling it a Pit Bull. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
reposting this quote, because it deserves to be repeated.
Yep. And let's not close our eyes and plug our ears while singing LALALALALALA and instead remember why B.S.L. is being enacted in the first place: IRRESPONSIBLE 'PIT BULL' OWNERS. No one else brought B.S.L. upon us. 'Pit bulll' owners brought B.S.L. upon 'pit bull' owners. Now it's time to govern ourselves and remove the dogs from the hands of those who do not need them and/or are the ones responsible for this entire mess in the first place. Or tomorrow none of us will own these dogs. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Give it up to pit bulls for giving bollys a bad bame. ---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:04 PM ---------- Also give it to the APBT for helping create our Bullies if you want to get technical about |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
All dog breeds have a few bad apples! there have been bully lines started by HA animals. Please think before you speak. No offense. BSL can apply to any dog breed. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Sorry I meant the community meaning the "pitbull" community. Meaning people who say that is not a pitbull *finger shake* because there are no papers, it is a mutt. Those who demand I dont call my dog a pitbull because that term only refers to the APBT, but at the same time the UKC refers to several breeds as pitbulls, it seems like an easy way of dividing the community if you ask me |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|