LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-08-2012, 06:26 PM   #21
SarSerceSaice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
Ok there are 6 pieces of ?junk like a lander on the Moon

well they await retrieval LOL....
SarSerceSaice is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 06:26 PM   #22
OWV9LSxH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
OK 6

What about manned landings ?
6 manned landings
OWV9LSxH is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 06:28 PM   #23
L6RLnyfl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
well they await retrieval LOL.... unlikely. they are regarded as historic sites and it would be frowned upon to interfere with them.
L6RLnyfl is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 06:28 PM   #24
Woziwfaq

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
367
Senior Member
Default
Thanks Bogsnorkler


That's great....
Woziwfaq is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 12:20 AM   #25
adoreorerie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Wondering why the Moon is so difficult... What do you mean, difficult? There have been more objects landed on the Moon than on Mars.
adoreorerie is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 12:30 AM   #26
nonDosearrany

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
I heard that going back to the Moon might take 10 years

Difficult ?
no atmosphere, no parachutes etc

Just wondering why the long lag time between landing and a future return
nonDosearrany is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 12:41 AM   #27
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
I heard that going back to the Moon might take 10 years Zarkov, you seem to be comparing the difficulty of manned lunar missions with unmanned Mars missions.
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 12:44 AM   #28
opelonafqe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Yes, I am... because one leads to the other normally

It seems the Moon does not belong to this logic

Manned..manned...manned.. etc

Interesting IMO
opelonafqe is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 01:04 AM   #29
Scukonah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
What?
Scukonah is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 01:14 AM   #30
ResistNewWorldOrder

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
USSR probes
Luna 2 crashed 13 September 1959
Luna 5 crashed 12 May 1965
Luna 7 crashed 7 October 1965
Luna 8 crashed 6 December 1965
Luna 9 landed 3 February 1966
Luna 13 landed 24 December 1966
Luna 15 crashed 21 July 1969
Luna 16 landed 20 September 1970
Luna 17 landed 17 November 1970
Luna 18 crashed 11 September 1971
Luna 20 landed 21 February 1972
Luna 21 landed 15 January 1973
Luna 23 landed 6 November 1974
Luna 24 landed 18 August 1976

NASA / US probes
Ranger 4 crashed 26 April 1962
Ranger 6 crashed 2 February 1964
Ranger 7 crashed 31 July 1964
Ranger 8 crashed 20 February 1965
Ranger 9 crashed 24 March 1965
Surveyor 1 landed 2 June 1966
Surveyor 2 crashed 23 September 1966
Surveyor 3 landed 20 April 1967
Surveyor 4 crashed (or possibly exploded just above surface) 17 July 1967
Surveyor 5 landed 11 September 1967
Surveyor 6 landed 10 November 1967
Surveyor 7 landed 10 January 1968
Lunar Orbiter 1 crashed 29 October 1966
Lunar Orbiter 2 crashed 11 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 3 crashed 9 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 4 crashed 31 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 5 crashed 31 January 1968

There have been six manned moon landings -
Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969
Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969
Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971
Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971
Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972
Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972 LOl, wouldn't want to be a statistician on this one
ResistNewWorldOrder is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:30 AM   #31
CiccoineFed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Don't bother, you don't have the aptitude for mathematics anyway.
CiccoineFed is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:31 AM   #32
r7rGOhvd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Actually, from my understanding, most Moon probes either fell short or overflew the Moon

As I have stated years ago, the Moon-Earth L1 is not known now (?) nor then....
[I have an accurate number]
This meant that a probe could not enter the Moon's spin space with a minimum known velocity
as well an orbit around the Moon is quite eccentric.
It was all hit or miss back then... there was no scientific logic involved.

I am sure that today the hit/miss parameters are a little more worked out... but I suspect Moon-Earth L1 is still only an approximation at all space centres.

Mars is an entirely different set of parameters... circular orbits..known velocities...atmosphere... L1 known (I suspect at least a reasonable approximation)

It is much much easier to land on Mars than on the Moon.
r7rGOhvd is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:33 AM   #33
xjNo4zvD

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
Actually, from my understanding, most Moon probes either fell short of overflew the Moon

As I have stated years ago, the Moon-Earth L1 is not known now (?) nor then....
[I have an accurate number]
This meant that a probe could not enter the Moon's spin space with a minimum known velocity
as well an orbit around the Moon is quite eccentric.
It was all hit or miss back then... there was no scientific logic involved.

I am sure that today the hit/miss parameters are a little more worked out... but I suspect Moon-Earth L1 is still only an approximation at all space centres.

Mars is an entirely different set of parameters... circular orbits..known velocities...atmosphere... L1 known (I suspect at least a reasonable approximation)

It is much much easier to land on Mars than on the Moon.
Your pseudo scientific nonesense is amazing.
xjNo4zvD is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:36 AM   #34
SnareeWer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
don't understand a word of it BC ? ... it's OK

One day I will present you with a manual... but until then...take care
SnareeWer is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:39 AM   #35
mymnduccete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
don't understand a word of it BC ? ... it's OK

One day I will present you with a manual... but until then...take care
I hate idle threats and vague promises.
mymnduccete is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:44 AM   #36
PolPitasc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
so do I

time will tell all
take care
PolPitasc is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:45 AM   #37
Hbkj89D2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
so do I

time will tell all
take care
Time tell all what? I hope it is something relevant.
Hbkj89D2 is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:49 AM   #38
halfstreet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
so do I

time will tell all
take care
I thought you siad time was a nonsense, Zarky, a human construct. Be consistently deluded, at least.
halfstreet is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:50 AM   #39
SinyugiN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
The unification of the infinitely enormous and the infinitely small
Cosmic existence is totally recursive.
SinyugiN is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 02:51 AM   #40
ManHolDenPoker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
a human construct. yes.. I am talking to humans, I suppose.... so you know what I mean
ManHolDenPoker is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity