Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Sorry BB and GR are incongruous with the absolute reality.
.... From experiment and direct observation matter, no matter how big, has a field around it where the magnetic component falls off as 1/r^3 that is it increases as r^3 the electric component of the field which falls off as 1/r This is the case The Universe is directly equivalent to the hunk of matter under discussion, except more complicated, but basically the same. Human conceived time has no impact on any of this |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
matter, no matter how big, has a field around it
where the magnetic component falls off as 1/r^3 that is it increases as r^3 the electric component of the field which falls off as 1/r is this agreeable even the atom has ?matter and an electric and magnetic component Neutrons are a magnet and protons and electrons are electric This is the basis of all matter, whether a star, planet or grain of sand. Do you agree ? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|