LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-15-2012, 12:57 PM   #1
Eromaveabeara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default Newton's Cradle


While the symmetry is satisfying, why does the initial ball (or balls) not bounce back instead of imparting nearly all the momentum and energy to the last ball (or balls)?

The simple equations used for the conservation of kinetic energy and conservation of momentum can show this is a possible solution, but they cannot be used to predict the final velocities when there are three or more balls in a cradle, because they provide only two equations to find the three or more unknowns (velocities of the balls). They give an infinite number of possible solutions if the system of balls is not examined in more detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_cradle Nice.... infinite complexity
Eromaveabeara is offline


Old 10-15-2012, 01:06 PM   #2
smazibummigue

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Nice.... infinite complexity Until the sustem is examined in more detail, when there is one solution again.
smazibummigue is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:38 AM   #3
Eromaveabeara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
IMO, such a simple demonstration and yet science knows so little of its physics.
Eromaveabeara is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:40 AM   #4
Clilmence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
IMO, such a simple demonstration and yet science knows so little of its physics.
Ref?
Clilmence is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:42 AM   #5
Piemonedmow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Ref?
Come on Mr. D, you know better than that...
Piemonedmow is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:43 AM   #6
Arr34ston

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
As of 2012-10-12T11:06, "IMO" is no longer a valid signal on this forum for content that is to be taken seriously.


See: http://www.abcforums.com/showthread.php?3106
Arr34ston is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:43 AM   #7
Anatolii

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
355
Senior Member
Default
he lives in hope even if he is doomed to die in despair.
Anatolii is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:45 AM   #8
Bgfbukpf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
he lives in hope even if he is doomed to die in despair.
I'll let you opposing nuts argue it out...LOL!

nighty night...
Bgfbukpf is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:45 AM   #9
Arr34ston

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
// Ref?

W4
Arr34ston is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 12:59 AM   #10
smazibummigue

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
IMO, such a simple demonstration and yet science knows so little of its physics.
What aspects of the physics are you saying that science knows little of?
smazibummigue is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 01:09 AM   #11
Clilmence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
What aspects of the physics are you saying that science knows little of?
I think he's talking about conservation of momentum, Rev. Dead-set complicated, that one
Clilmence is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 01:20 AM   #12
smazibummigue

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
I think he's talking about conservation of momentum, Rev. Dead-set complicated, that one
Well it's true that the motion of the balls can't be analysed from consideration of conservation of momentum alone, but I presume he is aware that there are other laws of dynamics.
smazibummigue is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 01:27 AM   #13
Clilmence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
Well it's true that the motion of the balls can't be analysed from consideration of conservation of momentum alone, but I presume he is aware that there are other laws of dynamics.
Sorry, Rev, I was just being sarky. (Reacting badly to woo at the moment. I'll be better after my IgG fix on Thursday.)

I know that the simple solution gives a small error (2%, from memory), but the whole thing is far from insoluble. Plenty of good explanations on the interwebthingy.
Clilmence is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:00 PM   #14
smazibummigue

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
So Zarkov, are you going to tell us what aspects of the physics you are saying that science knows little of?
smazibummigue is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:04 PM   #15
Arr34ston

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
/* While the symmetry is satisfying, why does the initial ball (or balls) not bounce back instead of imparting nearly all the momentum and energy to the last ball (or balls)? */

I'm not convinced it occurs for a purpose, but then what if there is a barrier behind the last ball, does not the initial ball bounce back?
Arr34ston is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:05 PM   #16
Eromaveabeara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Newton's cradle is a rather interesting device/demonstration

I like the big cover-all words... its just conservation of momentum, LOL
double speak

eg Why does two follow through..2 in 2 out.... easy LOL
and what of three ?...

I am not professing on this one.... I am in awe of Newton.
Eromaveabeara is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:06 PM   #17
Clilmence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
/* While the symmetry is satisfying, why does the initial ball (or balls) not bounce back instead of imparting nearly all the momentum and energy to the last ball (or balls)? */
That would make billiards a very boring game.
Clilmence is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:07 PM   #18
Arr34ston

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
// That would make billiards a very boring game.

Good point -- 'u see, if the other balls are next to a barrier, then it may well be that the initial ball bounces back, I won't claim to have seen this before though we all know whether I have.
Arr34ston is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:09 PM   #19
Eromaveabeara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
IMO, the secret to this device is the constraints.... maintaining a straight line of action
Eromaveabeara is offline


Old 10-16-2012, 09:11 PM   #20
smazibummigue

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Newton's cradle is a rather interesting device/demonstration

I like the big cover-all words... its just conservation of momentum, LOL
double speak

eg Why does two follow through..2 in 2 out.... easy LOL
and what of three ?...

I am not professing on this one.... I am in awe of Newton.
I'm sorry Zarkov, but I don't know what your point is here.
smazibummigue is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity