LOGO
USA Politics
USA political debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-21-2008, 01:25 PM   #1
NeroASERCH

Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
5,147
Senior Member
Default Sick of anti bush sentiments
I like Bush a lot and would have voted for him over anyone if he would be running.
NeroASERCH is offline


Old 02-21-2008, 03:02 PM   #2
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
59
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
i read a book called 'how liberals lost their way' - great book
Is that by the author of how Bush lost popularity and how the Republicans lost congress and probably the presidency because of him?
PhillipHer is offline


Old 02-21-2008, 04:06 PM   #3
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
59
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
Obama is attractive because he's not Hitlery. Many people simply still remember that Clinton's presidency ended up in an economic disaster of the tech bubble, and overall it wasn't half as good as what it was hyped to be. True, winning a debate doesn't qualify somebody, but some off line about this or that doesn't disqualify somebody either.
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 02-21-2008, 04:48 PM   #4
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
IMO, Clinton was the worst recent president. He was charismatic, and he just happened to be a president when the economy was good. But at the end of it all, his foreign policies--forcing Israel to deal with Arafat and bombing Serbia, and overall making the US look like the world's policeman--were immoral, wasteful, and disastrous. Especially for Israel. As for his economic policies, he did nothing about either the tech bubble, or the rising gas prices. There was absolutely nothing good about his presidency.
Drugmachine is offline


Old 02-21-2008, 04:57 PM   #5
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
Rubbish. The tax policies were formulated by the Republican Congress. Clinton only supported the welfare reform which is a very small fraction of the budgetary spending. Then, they decided to refinance the stock market by allowing individuals to invest. That resulted in the tech bubble which cost many people huge monetary losses, and which he did nothing to prevent. Not a thing. He was bombing Serbia and praising the economy while tens to hundreds of thousands of people were being laid off from their jobs. In case you don't remember, Bush specifically ran on a platform of minimal foreign interventionism. And he did follow up on that until 9/11 changed everything.

Clinton's main responsibility--the foreign policy--was a failure. Maybe with the exception of N. Ireland, but that was hardly his accomplishment. The Irish wanted to end their conflicts, and Clinton was just the right stooge at the right time to come in for the peace agreement signing ceremony. A saint? In the name of peace and stopping massacres? More like under pretense of peace and promoting massacres.
Lt_Apple is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity