USA Politics ![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I found this on my facebooks page:
"Romney, aircraft carriers and ships that go under water are needed in the desert, didnt you know?" the only reponse was: "Sounds like a bad lip reading..." Unfortunately, I fell asleep on and off during the debate. does anyone know what the face book poster was trying to say? Thanks, Salty |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I didn't hear the whole thing but I don't believe that is what he said. He DID misspeak and I think couldn't remember "submarine" and instead said "ships that go underwater" but then quickly said "submarine" after that.
Having a brother in the Navy for 24 years and who has been deployed in the Middle East numerous times, I can tell you that there are ships in the area AND that the Navy are on the ground in Afghanistan and were in Iraq as well. Heck, I just sent a box of goodies to Kabul! |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Bill, your post couldn't be more wrong about what we want.
Romney should have pointed to what history teaches us concerning this issue. 1. People declare a war has ended 2. People declare an end of our need of a large and prepared military..especially in light of technology 3. There is a major attack and a new war 4. We lose precious time and therefore massive amounts of people because we are playing catch up. 5. Repeat 1-4 |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Still, the Army is required to buy new battle tanks they don't want for a war which will never be fought. None of the services want the Joint Strike fighter which is designed for a war which will not be fought.
Russia has dozens of ice breakers including nuke jobs. The US has one ice breaker which Congress wants to retire. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|