[BoarmomorurrY]

The 39 million of Hispanics are only those "detected"... There are million more hidding.

Possibly, but we don't know as they hide like rats in sewers, attics, basements, trailer parks, etc.

Anyway...

My calculations for marriage are that Asians and Hispanics make up 79% of all interracial marriages, but in reality it is less because I did not include Native and Other, which will probably drop it to 76-77%.

But as I said, most blacks no longer marry at all (to other blacks included) if you count the cohabitation rates, the story is quite different. The black out of wedlock rate is also 70%, so a lot of these cohabitation people have kids. About 50% of Hispanics have kids out of wedlock in America. 25% of whites. So marriage is really an outdated indicator.

If you check cohabitation, which I have not calculated, but skimming the numbers, I would guess Asians and Hispanics are only about 60% combined.

[PZXjoe]

White Peruvians would never marry Afro-Peruvians ,they just like having them as servants.

True.

Wow.

[Qdkczrdi]

Possibly, but we don't know as they hide like rats in sewers, attics, basements, trailer parks, etc.

Anyway...

My calculations for marriage are that Asians and Hispanics make up 79% of all interracial marriages, but in reality it is less because I did not include Native and Other, which will probably drop it to 76-77%.

But as I said, most blacks no longer marry at all (to other blacks included) if you count the cohabitation rates, the story is quite different. The black out of wedlock rate is also 70%, so a lot of these cohabitation people have kids. About 50% of Hispanics have kids out of wedlock in America. 25% of whites. So marriage is really an outdated indicator.

If you check cohabitation, which I have not calculated, but skimming the numbers, I would guess Asians and Hispanics are only about 60% combined.

I stand by more 85% OF ALL INTER RACIAL MARRAIGES ARE LATINOS AND ASIANS who are intermarried.Also add the latinos and asians cohabitation in inter racial couples its HIGHER to 90%,blacks have the lowest inter racial couples. its reality.


The states with the highest inter marraige rates are the ones with high latino or asian population
like california,hawaiii,texas,nevada,new mexico. states with large black populations have lowest inter racial marraiges or couples.

[Suvuseh]

I stand by more 85% OF ALL INTER RACIAL MARRAIGES ARE LATINOS AND ASIANS who are intermarried.Also add the latinos and asians cohabitation in inter racial couples its HIGHER to 90%,blacks have the lowest inter racial couples. its reality.

Stand by that based on what? Your imagination.

I provided facts, real data. The original source of the data was the United States Census

http://www.census.gov/population/cen...-t19/tab02.pdf

You provided your opinion, which is worthless.

The original source of your data. Your imagination.

Classic.

Guess reading is not always fundamental, but I don't blame you. It's your parents fault. LOL

[mikaelluioy]

Possibly, but we don't know as they hide like rats in sewers, attics, basements, trailer parks, etc.
...

They have also hide in New Orleans, after Katrina

[LypeReexy]

Stand by that based on what? Your imagination.

I provided facts, real data. The original source of the data was the United States Census

http://www.census.gov/population/cen...-t19/tab02.pdf

You provided your opinion, which is worthless.

The original source of your data. Your imagination.

Classic.

Guess reading is not always fundamental, but I don't blame you. It's your parents fault. LOL

Dude, blacks are last in the interracial dating totem pole thats why they make up 10-15% of all intermarraige rates when compared to latinos and asians. deal with reality amigo.

[mikelangr]

Dude, blacks are last in the interracial dating totem pole thats why they make up 10-15% of all intermarraige rates when compared to latinos and asians. deal with reality amigo.

I never said blacks weren't last, what I said is that your numbers are skewed. (do I need to define skewed?)

What I said is true. What you said, in the fact of obvious truth, is a lie.

Where are you getting 10-15%. Not from the census. So from where? I can wait. Produce the data or admit you are a low brow sniveling liar.

DEAL.


You can do the math yourself, I provided government stats, you provided nothing.

Typical of someone who is unread and only wanting to spread anti-black propaganda.

Your response did not shock me, it is what I expected, because you are common. So common on sites like this that it is almost comical. Do they clone you people in a factory somewhere?

[drugsprevi]

I never said blacks weren't last, what I said is that your numbers are skewed. (do I need to define skewed?)

my stats are not skewed ,you just can't deal with reality.

Typical of someone who is unread and only wanting to spread anti-black propaganda.

i only told the truth.if the truth hurts your little ego, to bad.

Possibly, but we don't know as they hide like rats in sewers, attics, basements, trailer parks, etc.

look what you wrote about latinos, but you called me anti black because what i wrote was true. did i shatter your little ego?

[Vapepreab]

I did not fail to count minority - minority marriages or cohabitation.

As I said you have nothing. NO math.

I'm not talking about California, but the entire United States, and I'm not talking about who is "last on the totem pole" please try to keep up. Maybe I should use simpler sentences. Also do not try to change the subject. You never said you were speaking about the state of California and I definitely was not. I am speaking about and have been speaking about the entire United States of America.

I said, the number you stated was wrong.

It is wrong.

You really are not smart:

Mississippi has 3 million people, so blacks are about 39% that is barely 1 million blacks, only about 1/36 of the black population. You can't use a figure in that state to judge against Hispanics in California to compare in that fashion. That is pure nonsense.

The U.S. black population is over 36 million, 12% of the population.

California has 37 million people.
You are comparing apples and oranges.

There are more blacks in interracial marriages in New York than in Mississippi, and blacks in NY are not 39% of the population. Your numbers are meaningless. You have to change the percentages into real numbers or you are working with nonsense, because you have not equalized populations to make percentage comparisons to.

Have you ever taken one statistics class? How old are you?

The data is pretty clear. I provided it. You are obviously wrong.

You can continue to pull numbers out of your behind all you want, but that does not change facts.

Next you are going to compare blacks in Alaska to Hispanics in New Mexico.

Have you ever had an IQ test? I'm guessing it is barely about 80. Here is a suggestion, go play with someone in your league, like Penguin. You guys can drool together.

Get back to me when you do some math and can provide a source.

[Tilmbeinymn]

I did not fail to count minority - minority marriages or cohabitation.

As I said you have nothing. NO math.

I'm not talking about California, but the entire United States, and I'm not talking about who is "last on the totem pole" please try to keep up. Maybe I should use simpler sentences. Also do not try to change the subject. You never said you were speaking about the state of California and I definitely was not. I am speaking about and have been speaking about the entire United States of America.

I said, the number you stated was wrong.

It is wrong.

You really are not smart:

Mississippi has 3 million people, so blacks are about 39% that is barely 1 million blacks, only about 1/36 of the black population. You can't use a figure in that state to judge against Hispanics in California to compare in that fashion. That is pure nonsense.

The U.S. black population is over 36 million, 12% of the population.

California has 37 million people.
You are comparing apples and oranges.

There are more blacks in interracial marriages in New York than in Mississippi, and blacks in NY are not 39% of the population. Your numbers are meaningless. You have to change the percentages into real numbers or you are working with nonsense, because you have not equalized populations to make percentage comparisons to.

Have you ever taken one statistics class? How old are you?

The data is pretty clear. I provided it. You are obviously wrong.

You can continue to pull numbers out of your behind all you want, but that does not change facts.

Next you are going to compare blacks in Alaska to Hispanics in New Mexico.

Have you ever had an IQ test? I'm guessing it is barely about 80. Here is a suggestion, go play with someone in your league, like Penguin. You guys can drool together.

Get back to me when you do some math and can provide a source.

Im giving you an example of California having the highest inter racial marraiges 15%-relations in the mainland usa due to it's 35% latino[majority mexican descent] and 12% asian population.

Mississippi is a great example of how low racial inter marraiges is between white and blacks only 1% .mississipi is 37% black 62% white. it proves that whites don't want to marry or hook up with black people.

and my data of latinos and asians making 85% of the interracial marraiges in the usa is correct. blacks are only 15% of the interacial marraiges out of the 3 groups.

[Aleksis]

LOL, I really got your mind. You are so broken. This is not even funny anymore, it is sad.

[Lillie_Steins]

LOL, I really got your mind. You are so broken. This is not even funny anymore, it is sad.

The truth hurts!
California 15% inter-marraige rate.
The highest inter -racial marraiges in the USA ARE in California .
35% latino,12% asian populations.

The lowest in Missisisppi .
37% black population.
1% intermarraige rate.

now go cry to moma.

[PriniMai]

Yeah... because Peru is known for being a nation with such a large White and Black population, correct? Do you know anything about playing the odds? What are the odds that a Black Peruvian, few as they are, and a White Peruvian, few as they are, will get together? Then what are the odds they'd be murdered by members of these very small populations? The odds are greater in the U.S., obviously, because of the large populations of the two groups.

The Afrodescendant population in Peru is 9% The Euro population is 15%, most all concentrated in the Coast. 44% is Mestizo, 7% Indigenous. And the existence of such a high Mestizo population is because people weren't getting killed.

Why don't you actually pick a nation that has much larger minority ethnic groups. They don't have to be racial groups. But there has to be antagonism between them. LOL. Try again. The whole point of my comment is that in Peru we don't have that kind of antagonism. It is not natural in all nations.

[Opinion_counts]

White Peruvians would never marry Afro-Peruvians ,they just like having them as servants.

Wrong again. While it is more Taboo, it does occur. But there is no killing over it. If anything, social gossip. Usually what happens is there is more mix in the lower classes and then the mixed population mixed with the White.

Like Adriana Zubiate and Gabriel Calvo.

[unapelosina]

The Afrodescendant population in Peru is 9% .

Come on Salsa. You changed your demographics once again?

[interznakinfo]

Come on Salsa. You changed your demographics once again?

Those are the latest according to La comision a la verdad. 9% Afrodesendant: 7% Afro-Mestizo, 2% Negro.

\
Edit:
Actually I think they misquoted. I believe the 2% is within the 7%.

[Boveosteors]

PERU only 7% Indigenous????¡ HAHAHAHAHA I had a good laugh reading that

[socialkiiii]

Yeap. I wonder in what Black College those Peruvian demographers studied.

[Ccddfergt]

The Euro population is 15%, most all concentrated in the Coast. 44% is Mestizo, 31% Indigenous and 7% Afrodescendant And the existence of such a high Mestizo population is because people weren't getting killed.

That is a typo. I ate part of my quote.

[Baromaro]

That is a typo. I ate part of my quote.

I see, makes more sense now.