LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-05-2012, 09:15 PM   #1
seawolferr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default Which groups (s) are more egalitarian?
I think black people are, haven't seen that many of us every argue for non egalitarian practices towards other race. Some Arabs were egalitarian than others, thats why they have more SSA DNA than other peoples.
seawolferr is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:17 PM   #2
snunsebrugs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
I think black people are, haven't seen that many of us every argue for non egalitarian practices towards other race.
Affirmative Action is the opposite of egalitarian.

Equal opportunities - Good
Equal outcomes - Bad
snunsebrugs is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:19 PM   #3
Vkowefek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
Affirmative Action.
That is to make equal what isn't equal, egalitarianism. Going against it is not egalitarian.

---------- Post added 2012-06-05 at 13:21 ----------

Israelis are the least egalitarian in the Middle East.

---------- Post added 2012-06-05 at 13:22 ----------

Affirmative Action is the opposite of egalitarian.

Equal opportunities - Good
Equal outcomes - Bad
What are equal outcomes bad? Well capitalism is anti egalitarian in itself.
Vkowefek is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:27 PM   #4
BokerokyBan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
That is to make equal what isn't equal, egalitarianism. Going against it is not egalitarian.
Forcing organisations to hire black people is discrimination on the grounds of race.
This is where equality of outcomes leads.

Equality of opportunity is the egalitarian option, where people are hired because they are the best person for the job, not because of their race and/or sex. Equal opportunities means that a white man and a black woman have just as much chance to get hired.

Now that won't necessarily lead to equal outcomes, but everyone had an equal chance to get the job. If we are going to force people to hire a certain amount of ethnic minorities or women or whatever, then you will I assume have no problem with NBA basketball teams being forced to pick disabled white women over the age of 50 for their team. Otherwise those basketball teams are guilty of sexism, racism and ageism, as well as discriminating against the disabled.

---------- Post added 2012-06-05 at 14:31 ----------

Equal opportunity - work harder and you will probably get more
Equal outcome - Some people work hard and some people don't but they all get the same reward

Which is egalitarian?
BokerokyBan is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:31 PM   #5
ancexttew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
I think anyone regardless of race disagrees with the concept of Affirmative Action, on the other hand, we all know what happens if Affirmative Action is removed. And by the way White women also benefit from AA (many say they are the ones benefiting the most)
ancexttew is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:36 PM   #6
JewJoleSole

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
AA never forces anyone to hire anyone else, only those most qualified are eligible.
JewJoleSole is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:40 PM   #7
uneniaPhenits

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
684
Senior Member
Default
AA never forces anyone to hire anyone else, only those most qualified are eligible.
Well I don't know how it works exactly as it is illegal in the UK, but it is still favouring one group over another on the grounds of race or sex.

It's a shame that discrimination and slavery and many other things have left the impact that they have, but why limit the opportunities of white males today as a result of that? We weren't even born when those things happened.
uneniaPhenits is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:42 PM   #8
Queueftof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Well I don't know how it works exactly as it is illegal in the UK, but it is still favouring one group over another on the grounds of race or sex.

It's a shame that discrimination and slavery and many other things have left the impact that they have, but why limit the opportunities of white males today as a result of that? We weren't even born when those things happened.
Its not favoring one group another.
Queueftof is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:44 PM   #9
ClaudeMarkus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Its not favoring one group another.
How is affirmative action not favouring certain groups over others?
ClaudeMarkus is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:47 PM   #10
CaseyFronczek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
How is affirmative action not favouring certain groups over others?
Whiteness in itself is an advantage over other groups, the same people who are against AA are the same ones who believe and want their ethnic group or race to be dominant over other races and ethnicities so they make policies to limit the number of success ful people who are not their ethnicity or race.
CaseyFronczek is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:47 PM   #11
ligaliaCods

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
349
Senior Member
Default
I don't believe a egalitarian society ever existed, besides possibly nomadic groups. In other words each society or materialistic culture had some sought of hierarchical structure, where you had the elite and those in the bottom of the social or class ladder. I am talking historically both past and present, and globally.
ligaliaCods is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:50 PM   #12
Juersdodfs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Whiteness in itself is an advantage over other groups, the same people who are against AA are the same ones who believe and want their ethnic group or race to be dominant over other races and ethnicities so they make policies to limit the number of success ful people who are not their ethnicity or race.
That isn't answering the question I asked, so I will answer it myself.

Germany. Article 3 of the German Basic Law provides for equal rights of all people regardless of sex, race or social background. There are programs stating that if men and women have equal qualifications, women have to be preferred for a job; moreover, the handicapped should be preferred to healthy people. This is typical for all positions in state and university service as of 2007, typically using the phrase "We try to increase diversity in this line of work". In recent years, there has been a long public debate about whether to issue programs that would grant women a privileged access to jobs in order to fight discrimination. "if men and women have equal qualifications, women have to be preferred for a job"
Equal outcomes instead of equal opportunity, not egalitarian.
Juersdodfs is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:52 PM   #13
comprar-espana

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
I don't believe a egalitarian society ever existed, besides possibly nomadic groups. In other words each society or materialistic culture had some sought of hierarchical structure, where you had the elite and those in the bottom of the social or class ladder.
Egalitarianism has degrees, true. I remember some anthropologist saying that all SSA DNA in Arabs shouldn't be interpreted as slave trade because some Islamic groups were egalitarian and believed the Koranic scriptures that emphasizes equality of all humans. But that would require geneticists studying each Islamic group and time periods in detail which is time consuming to them so half the story gets told.
comprar-espana is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:53 PM   #14
tipokotap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
735
Senior Member
Default
Sweden. Special treatments of certain groups are commonplace in Sweden. Leveraging of the opportunities of these groups is encouraged by the state. One example is the police, who give women and people from other cultural and ethnic backgrounds concessions when it comes to testing for entrance to the police academy. Did better than him in the exam? Sorry, we gave him the job because he is not white and you are.
Equality of outcomes not equality of opportunity.
tipokotap is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:54 PM   #15
MYMcvBgl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
That isn't answering the question I asked, so I will answer it myself.



"if men and women have equal qualifications, women have to be preferred for a job"
Equal outcomes instead of equal opportunity, not egalitarian.
Yet there are still more men in positions that carry clout and influence than women and women are significantly less paid than men who have same or even less qualifications than women have. Your shit doesn't add up Jon Wayne.
MYMcvBgl is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 09:57 PM   #16
suiviouse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Yet there are still more men in positions that carry clout and influence than women and women are significantly less paid than men who have same or even less qualifications than women have. Your shit doesn't add up Jon Wayne.
Citation needed.
suiviouse is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 10:00 PM   #17
Greapyjeory

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
Citation needed.
The constitution in America prohibits discrimination based on race and gender but one group still dominates the others, white males, and they argue nail and tooth against challenge to their dominance.
Greapyjeory is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 10:05 PM   #18
golfmenorca

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
The constitution in America prohibits discrimination based on race and gender but one group still dominates the others, white males, and they argue nail and tooth against challenge to their dominance.
The President of the country is black!

This proves black people have the chance to do anything they want. If they are still worse off than everyone else, who is to blame? They get the same chance as everyone else and are in the same education system and everything. Racism against Jews and Chinese people has been just as prevalent, but yet they are doing better than whites on average.
golfmenorca is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 10:10 PM   #19
Kayakeenemeds

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
The President of the country is black!

This proves black people have the chance to do anything they want. If they are still worse off than everyone else, who is to blame? They get the same chance as everyone else and are in the same education system and everything. Racism against Jews and Chinese people has been just as prevalent, but yet they are doing better than whites on average.
Are you insinuating there is no racism because there is a black president? If you believe that shit reverse discrimination through AA doesn't exist because all of the presidents and Prime Ministers in the United States and Europe are white and male, , stop compaining about racism liar.
Kayakeenemeds is offline


Old 06-05-2012, 10:11 PM   #20
euylvaygdq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
624
Senior Member
Default
Egalitarianism has degrees, true. I remember some anthropologist saying that all SSA DNA in Arabs shouldn't be interpreted as slave trade because some Islamic groups were egalitarian and believed the Koranic scriptures that emphasizes equality of all humans. But that would require geneticists studying each Islamic group and time periods in detail which is time consuming to them so half the story gets told.
Yeah, they probably married Muslim Blacks or converts... Could you give me a source for your claim, please?
euylvaygdq is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity