LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-21-2012, 01:56 PM   #1
Charryith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Italy
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default Skins and Boys are planning to fight the salery cap ruling
Its unconfirmed but local radio is reporting that Bruce Allen was overheard to say that the two teams are planning to fight their penalties.
Charryith is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 02:25 PM   #2
rikdpola

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
568
Senior Member
Default
Its unconfirmed but local radio is reporting that Bruce Allen was overheard to say that the two teams are planning to fight their penalties.
Why wouldn't they?
rikdpola is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 02:29 PM   #3
Charryith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Italy
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default
Why wouldn't they?
Theres probably an unspoken rule about suing your fellow owners for collusion
Charryith is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 02:46 PM   #4
rikdpola

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
568
Senior Member
Default
Theres probably an unspoken rule about suing your fellow owners for collusion
Wasn't the no salary cap for last year an unspoken rule as well? No matter what everyone's intentions are or should be, unless something was written and they violated it I would appeal it too. Hell Ryan Braun got away with cheating.
rikdpola is offline


Old 03-26-2012, 01:15 AM   #5
KirillAristov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/...-cap-grievance

As much as I really don't care for either team, especially their owners, I totally agree with them filing their grievance against the league and NFLPA. If it's an uncapped year and the teams can afford to pay gaudy money to their players for that year, do it. The gentleman's code goes out the window when regulations expire, IMO. This league is about winning, and getting the best people to help you. Hell, considering both teams sucked that year and missed the playoffs altogether that year and last year, despite having rediculous player payrolls, that should be punishment enough. They couldn't capitalize on their spending sprees and both teams probably regressed in that year.
KirillAristov is offline


Old 03-26-2012, 04:19 AM   #6
VYholden

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
635
Senior Member
Default
Just like the Saints thing, it's not so much that they were the only ones, it's that they were warned and ignored it.
VYholden is offline


Old 03-26-2012, 04:59 AM   #7
BaselBimbooooo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
646
Senior Member
Default
Just like the Saints thing, it's not so much that they were the only ones, it's that they were warned and ignored it.
and the warning in this case literally meant nothing. they were warned that they had to partake in collusion. good luck defending that in court.
BaselBimbooooo is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity