Reply to Thread New Thread |
02-15-2012, 09:59 PM | #1 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 10:09 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 10:11 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 10:59 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 11:01 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 11:02 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 11:08 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 02:41 AM | #9 |
|
Bittersweet. I prefer 2 guys over 3. I dont think I need 3 guys telling me the obvious about a play that happened 5mins ago. 2 guys can handle that fine.
No problem with Jaws. In fact I think he is pretty good. So its a bit of a negative to lose him. Im OK with Chucky, but he can bug me from time to time (what booth guy doesn't) Jaws Might have a better gig going forward and maybe it will be good thing. |
|
02-16-2012, 03:26 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:27 AM | #12 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:36 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 05:02 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 05:13 AM | #15 |
|
Bittersweet. I prefer 2 guys over 3. I dont think I need 3 guys telling me the obvious about a play that happened 5mins ago. 2 guys can handle that fine. |
|
02-16-2012, 02:14 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:18 PM | #17 |
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:31 PM | #18 |
|
I like a 3 man booth for one reason...You have the play by play guy- and ESPN has a good one- and then you have the analyst. Now, in a 2 man booth, we get to hear things on strategy from say, whatever perspective Troy Aikman has. In a 3 man booth with two analysts, the second analyst can call the first one on his bullshit or biases. |
|
02-16-2012, 05:32 PM | #19 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|