LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-14-2012, 03:40 PM   #1
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default Free Agency Primer: NFC North
Free Agency Primer: NFC North

Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings | Comments




Despite missing four games last season, Matt Forte managed to tally 1,487 yards of total offense for the Bears. (AP)

If the Bears can get healthy again in 2012 and the Vikings can take a few steps forward, the NFC North might be able to stake a strong claim as the NFL’s best division. It was in the running in 2011, despite Chicago’s late-season face plant and Minnesota’s 3-13 finish.
The Packers, with Aaron Rodgers and a host of weapons around him, are not going anywhere. There’s also every reason to believe the Lions are here to stay for awhile, what with Matthew Stafford slinging the ball all over the field.
Will this offseason help Detroit, Chicago and Minnesota close the gap on Green Bay or will the Packers reassert their standing atop the division? We’ll see how the chips fall, but for now, let’s take a look at the decisions facing the NFC North teams in free agency:
Chicago Bears
Key free agents: TE Kellen Davis, RB Matt Forte, DB Corey Graham, QBs Caleb Hanie/Josh McCown, DE Israel Idonije, DB Tim Jennings, WR Roy Williams
• Players Chicago needs back: Davis; Forte; Jennings
The Bears absolutely cannot afford to lose Forte, so they’ll utilize the franchise tag on him if they can’t reach a deal with him. That will result in a big salary-cap hit, but Forte’s in line for a massive contract anyway after how he’s performed over his first four seasons in the league.
Could Chicago upgrade over Davis and Jennings? Probably — and the Bears may try to do that. Davis, though, was extremely underutilized in Mike Martz’s scheme and might be a sleeper pick to excel under new offensive coordinator Mike Tice. He’s a useful blocker and could develop into a fine red-zone target. Jennings, meanwhile, played better than most people will give him credit for in 2011. Chicago may not want him starting 15 games at cornerback again, but the Bears could do worse.
• Players Chicago should let walk: Idonije; Williams
Idonije turned in a strong 2010 playing opposite Julius Peppers on Chicago’s D-line but he had just five sacks in 2011. That’s not enough when Peppers is attracting as much attention as he does. Idonije will turn 32 during next season, so Chicago should opt to get younger and better here.
Williams has been remarkably consistent at being mediocre over the past four seasons. His catch totals since 2008: 36, 38, 37, 37.
• Outlook: Assuming some freak occurrence doesn’t unleash Forte onto the free-agent market, the Bears look to be in decent shape, both from a continuity standpoint and in their salary-cap situation. A few upgrades here and there could put them right back in the hunt in 2011.
Detroit Lions
• Key free agents: DE Cliff Avril, OT Jeff Backus, DT Sammie Lee Hill (restricted), QB Shaun Hill, LB DeAndre Levy (restricted), RBs Maurice Morris/Kevin Smith, LB Stephen Tulloch, DB Eric Wright
• Players Detroit needs back: Avril; Backus; S. Lee Hill; Levy; Tulloch
Detroit has some pretty key pieces about to hit the market, so there’s work to be done in the Motor City. Avril, whether it’s via a long-term deal or the franchise tag, should be the Lions’ top target for a 2012 return. He has developed into a ferocious pass-rusher and should continue to thrive with Ndamukong Suh, Nick Fairley and others eating up blockers inside.
Levy and Tulloch represent 2/3 of Detroit’s starting linebacking corps. Levy struggled at times after sliding from the middle to an outside spot, but Tulloch was arguably Detroit’s most consistent defender outside of Avril.
Backus is 34 and tore his biceps in Detroit’s playoff loss, so you could understand why the franchise would keep its eyes open for other options. But in terms of what the Lions currently have, he’s definitely the best choice on the left side.
• Players Detroit should let walk: Morris; Wright
The Lions asked a lot of Wright, and while he turned in four picks in 16 starts, he was mostly overmatched. Morris has been a valuable backup for three seasons, but Smith should be a higher priority for Detroit.
• Outlook: All those high draft picks in recent years have hamstrung the Lions’ salary-cap situation. They’re projected to be right up against the 2012 cap number, so they will try to restructure some deals — but a few difficult decisions likely loom.
Green Bay Packers
• Key free agents: QB Matt Flynn, RB Ryan Grant, TE Jermichael Finley, OL Scott Wells
• Players Green Bay needs back: Wells
Few teams in the NFL are in as solid shape this offseason as the Packers, who have a little money to spend and will return the majority of their roster. Wells is the one loss that might set Green Bay back a bit. Despite the Pack’s offensive line taking a lot of heat, Wells had a strong enough 2011 to earn a Pro Bowl bid. He’s equally adept against the pass and the run.
Losing him would not be the end of the world for the Packers, but it certainly would be a blow.
• Players Green Bay should let walk: Grant; Finley
Grant started 14 games this season, but after suffering a season-ending injury in 2010, he just doesn’t have it anymore. James Starks may not be the long-term answer at running back for Green Bay, but he’s more of a threat right now than Grant.
Finley has to be one of the more frustrating players in the NFL. As tight ends take over around the league, Finley continues to be one of the more talented players at the position. But he’s an inconsistent as they come — he dropped 12 balls in 2011 and struggled as a blocker in the run game. Green Bay could find a cheaper option with a similar skill set.
Outlook: Just eight Packers are in line to hit free agency: Howard Green, Erik Walden, Patrick Lee and Jarrett Bush plus the four mentioned above. Of those, Flynn will command the most interest, thanks in no small part to his Week 17 dismantling of Detroit. The Packers would love to keep him, but it doesn’t seem to be financially viable. Bringing Wells back would be huge for 2012, but he’s the only guy that should be on Green Bay’s must-have list.
Minnesota Vikings
Key free agents: S Husain Abdullah, LB E.J. Henderson, LB Erin Henderson, DB Benny Sapp, TE Visanthe Shiancoe
Players Minnesota needs back: Abdullah; Erin Henderson
At some point the Vikings need to upgrade over Abdullah, who briefly looked like he might be headed for retirement at age 26 because of concussion issues. He’s nothing spectacular at the safety position, but he can at least provide Minnesota with an experienced veteran in the defensive backfield.
Henderson’s brother, E.J., had bigger numbers in 2011 as Minnesota’s middle linebacker, but the ceiling is much higher for the younger Erin. Given a chance to start for the first time last season, Erin Henderson picked up 70 tackles and proved himself to be a stout run defender. Especially if E.J. leaves in free agency, Erin’s presence will be needed.
Players Minnesota should let walk: E.J. Henderson; Shiancoe
Three years removed from a gruesome leg injury, E.J. Henderson topped 100 tackles again. But he will be 32 before the 2012 season starts and seems to have lost a step or two. Turning the middle over to Jasper Brinkley would save Minnesota some money and help the team get quicker.
Plain and simple, there’s no reason for the Vikings to bring back the 31-year-old Shiancoe. They have a rising tight end on their roster in Kyle Rudolph (who may already be a more dangerous weapon than Shiancoe), and Shiancoe’s gotten worse and worse as a blocker.
Outlook: The Vikings have a 17 free agents, not counting Jimmy Kleinsasser, who’s expected to retire. When you look at the list, it doesn’t seem to feature too many impact guys, but the fact that several of the players had important roles last year for Minnesota shows off a bit of why that team struggled so much in 2011. The Vikings need a talent infusion — a process that should start by sending most of their internal free agents packing.
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 04:07 PM   #2
FYvWldC0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
if we can find a cheaper option with a similar skill set, name one Mr. Article Writer.
FYvWldC0 is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 04:19 PM   #3
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
if we can find a cheaper option with a similar skill set, name one Mr. Article Writer.
I was surprised at his Finley comments as well.. 11 drops over the year justifies not resigning?
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 05:27 PM   #4
FYvWldC0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
I was surprised at his Finley comments as well.. 11 drops over the year justifies not resigning?
I hope not. I think he just had the yips this year, hopefully the offseason gets him over that shit.
FYvWldC0 is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 06:26 PM   #5
VtLe67WR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Stupid article on the Finley part alone. Some local radio guys were just making fun of people who say to let Finley walk and I agree with them 1000000%. It's so fucking stupid.
VtLe67WR is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 11:14 PM   #6
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Adjusting salary cap for rollover totals

February, 13, 2012 Feb 13

5:45
PM ET


•Email
•Print
•Comments899

By Kevin Seifert




As we continue to explore the dry but important implementation of the NFL's new salary cap, I point you in the direction of John Clayton's Monday morning mailbag. Clayton describes a new facet of the 2012 cap: The ability of teams to roll over leftover space from the previous year, something that has pushed the available space of some teams to more than $60 million.

Alas, that won't be the case for any NFC North team in 2012. Each of them have rolled over 2011 leftovers, but the new space won't make a dramatic difference on the numbers we discussed last week. Again, it's important to stress that the NFL cap situation remains fluid, and the numbers will change between now and the start of the new league year on March 13. But let's give you an idea of what the rollover means for NFC North teams:

Chicago Bears
Last week's figure: $101.8
Rollover: About $7.7 million
What it means: The Bears are projected to have about $25 million in cap space.

Detroit Lions
Last week's figure: $122.8 million
Rollover: About $1.3 million
What it means: The Lions are very close to the projected cap number of about $120 million.

Green Bay Packers
Last week's figure: $115.3 million
Rollover: About $5.8 million
What it means: The Packers are about $10 million -- $11 million below the cap.

Minnesota Vikings
Last week's figure: $115.3 million
Rollover: About $1.9 million
What it means: That rollover is projected to be mitigated by a reconciliation (don't ask) that will basically leave the Vikings where they were: About $5 million under the cap.
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 11:20 PM   #7
Gofthooxdix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
He should include players likely to be cut.
Gofthooxdix is offline


Old 02-14-2012, 11:24 PM   #8
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
He should include players likely to be cut.
Then it would go from factual to speculation.
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 04:56 AM   #9
PyncGyncliacy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
706
Senior Member
Default
It should be interesting to watch the Calvin Johnson negotiations...They need him to sign long term to clear up some cap room...will he do so to help the team win, or will he hold to his contract terms, signifying an exit strategy? Stay tuned.

And yeah, the Finley stuff is silly. $5.5 mil for his production...you aren't finding that in free agency or the draft this year. For a second there I thought he typo-ed and meant Flynn.
PyncGyncliacy is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 02:35 PM   #10
PriernPayorse

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
It should be interesting to watch the Calvin Johnson negotiations...They need him to sign long term to clear up some cap room...will he do so to help the team win, or will he hold to his contract terms, signifying an exit strategy? Stay tuned.

And yeah, the Finley stuff is silly. $5.5 mil for his production...you aren't finding that in free agency or the draft this year. For a second there I thought he typo-ed and meant Flynn.
Finley is seeking the WR tag..
PriernPayorse is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 03:47 PM   #11
Gofthooxdix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Finley is seeking the WR tag..
He should catch better...
Gofthooxdix is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 05:17 PM   #12
PyncGyncliacy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
706
Senior Member
Default
Finley is seeking the WR tag..
Good luck with that, considering he lined up tight the majority of his snaps.
PyncGyncliacy is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 05:29 PM   #13
CaseyFronczekHomie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
Good luck with that, considering he lined up tight the majority of his snaps.
Not by much. I think I read 46% outside and 54% inside. Didn't Suggs succeed in a similar argument, essentially forcing a hybrid tag?
CaseyFronczekHomie is offline


Old 02-15-2012, 06:04 PM   #14
Gofthooxdix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Here's the moves I was thinking of

Clifton is a part-timer and will be cut.

Driver is a part-timer and will likely get a reduced deal if he's not cut outright.

Woodson's roster bonus can be converted to signing bonus and spread out over 3 years.

Collins will let the Packers know if he can play sometime before the draft. If he's a no-go, he will be cut and not get his 4 million.


General manager Ted Thompson is not sentimental and he's going to have to knock down WR Donald Driver's $5 million cap number. He may decide to cut him no matter what, but if he doesn't, he'll force Driver to take a major pay cut.

He can also clear $5.7 million by parting ways with LT Chad Clifton. That seems a likelihood after Marshall Newhouse developed into a competent starter over the course of replacing the injured Clifton last year.

Another possibility is gaining $4 million in room if S Nick Collins is forced to retire because of a neck injury. That, however, is cap room Thompson truly doesn't want.

In addition, he could make the bold decision not to pay CB Charles Woodson a $4 million roster bonus due in April, thereby making him a free agent and clearing $11.5 million in cap room. But if he sticks with Woodson, he can still restructure the $4 million bonus so it spreads out over the final three years of his deal, thereby saving him about $2.6 million in cap space.

At a minimum, those three moves would create $10 million and at the most as much as $13 million in cap room, easily enough to keep Finley, Wells and Bush. http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/138497134.html
Gofthooxdix is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity