Ultimate QBR - Page 3 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**PaulRyansew** · 11-11-2011, 03:17 AM

LMAO. I can't believe that the wrote up an essay trying to defend the stat. QBR is clearly a broken and incomplete statistic.

Seriously, I would think this occurrence would have been a good reason to return to the drawing board and say,"Whoops, my bad."

**PaulRyansew** · 11-11-2011, 03:18 AM

Anything anti-Rodgers will be bashed here. Let's just face the fact that Alex Smith is better than Rodgers. He was drafted well ahead of him and will always be better. Let it go.

Best QB in the NFL, apparently.

**en-druzhba** · 11-11-2011, 05:43 AM

isn't this the dilfer thing?

Dilfer probably is anti good QB's.

It is. Playing great as a QB (and winning by huge margins due to your early scoring plays) obviously makes you a lesser QB than if you are playing in a bunch of close games. The stat also seems to think that every sack is the fault of the QB.

**Pippoles** · 12-10-2011, 07:02 AM

So he went 4 for 10? Apparently the system doesn't penalize a QB for incompletions huh? Or you can simply gain a few yards rushing and 40% passing is ignored...

I like how some of the ESPN comments have people insisting that Tebow's 16 plays were better than Arod's 47 so that's why the stat works.

**PaulRyansew** · 12-10-2011, 07:05 AM

So he went 4 for 10? Apparently the system doesn't penalize a QB for incompletions huh? Or you can simply gain a few yards rushing and 40% passing is ignored...

I like how some of the ESPN comments have people insisting that Tebow's 16 plays were better than Arod's 47 so that's why the stat works.

QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch.

Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight.

**treawittelf** · 12-10-2011, 01:49 PM

QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch.

Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight.

I believe that the Sam Braford way of leading his WRs into head-on collision should be be part of the formula.

Put in- Games lost by WR due to bad passes.

**Pete789** · 12-10-2011, 02:22 PM

QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch.

Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight.

which is BS. Harvin's yards would be double if Mcnabb could hit him in stride

**treawittelf** · 12-10-2011, 02:38 PM

Anything anti-Rodgers will be bashed here. Let's just face the fact that Alex Smith is better than Rodgers. He was drafted well ahead of him and will always be better. Let it go.

Well, since he's the best QB he better show it in fantasy points cause I just picked him up.

Because fantasy points are the TRUE measure of greatness.

**amusaasyday** · 12-10-2011, 02:52 PM

Well, since he's the best QB he better show it in fantasy points cause I just picked him up.

Because fantasy points are the TRUE measure of greatness.

Is Cam Newton your other QB?

**Qynvtlur** · 12-10-2011, 06:08 PM

Those were the most clutch 4 completions in the history of football.

\

Enough to satisfy all Denver fans assembled.
Loaves and fishes.

**PickEmUp** · 12-10-2011, 08:19 PM

Its a horrible stat and its confusing but i think its espn's attempt at forcing something else down our throats. I zone out when they talk qbr, its not a real stat and its only something they use so it has no relevance to me.

**nannysuetle** · 12-10-2011, 08:23 PM

which is BS. Harvin's yards would be double if Mcnabb could hit him in stride

Everyone's would.

11-11-2011, 03:17 AM	#41
PaulRyansew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	LMAO. I can't believe that the wrote up an essay trying to defend the stat. QBR is clearly a broken and incomplete statistic. Seriously, I would think this occurrence would have been a good reason to return to the drawing board and say,"Whoops, my bad." Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-11-2011, 03:18 AM	#42
PaulRyansew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	Anything anti-Rodgers will be bashed here. Let's just face the fact that Alex Smith is better than Rodgers. He was drafted well ahead of him and will always be better. Let it go. Best QB in the NFL, apparently. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-11-2011, 05:43 AM	#43
en-druzhba Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	isn't this the dilfer thing? Dilfer probably is anti good QB's. It is. Playing great as a QB (and winning by huge margins due to your early scoring plays) obviously makes you a lesser QB than if you are playing in a bunch of close games. The stat also seems to think that every sack is the fault of the QB. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 07:02 AM	#44
Pippoles Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 448 Senior Member	So he went 4 for 10? Apparently the system doesn't penalize a QB for incompletions huh? Or you can simply gain a few yards rushing and 40% passing is ignored... I like how some of the ESPN comments have people insisting that Tebow's 16 plays were better than Arod's 47 so that's why the stat works. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 07:05 AM	#45
PaulRyansew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	So he went 4 for 10? Apparently the system doesn't penalize a QB for incompletions huh? Or you can simply gain a few yards rushing and 40% passing is ignored... I like how some of the ESPN comments have people insisting that Tebow's 16 plays were better than Arod's 47 so that's why the stat works. QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch. Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 01:49 PM	#46
treawittelf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 535 Senior Member	QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch. Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight. I believe that the Sam Braford way of leading his WRs into head-on collision should be be part of the formula. Put in- Games lost by WR due to bad passes. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 02:22 PM	#47
Pete789 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 536 Senior Member	QBR doesn't give the QB any credit for run after the catch. Because a QB apparently has nothing to do with hitting a receiver in a position to run to daylight. which is BS. Harvin's yards would be double if Mcnabb could hit him in stride Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 02:38 PM	#48
treawittelf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 535 Senior Member	Anything anti-Rodgers will be bashed here. Let's just face the fact that Alex Smith is better than Rodgers. He was drafted well ahead of him and will always be better. Let it go. Well, since he's the best QB he better show it in fantasy points cause I just picked him up. Because fantasy points are the TRUE measure of greatness. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 02:52 PM	#49
amusaasyday Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 566 Senior Member	Well, since he's the best QB he better show it in fantasy points cause I just picked him up. Because fantasy points are the TRUE measure of greatness. Is Cam Newton your other QB? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 06:08 PM	#50
Qynvtlur Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 407 Senior Member	Those were the most clutch 4 completions in the history of football. \ Enough to satisfy all Denver fans assembled. Loaves and fishes. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 08:19 PM	#51
PickEmUp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 450 Senior Member	Its a horrible stat and its confusing but i think its espn's attempt at forcing something else down our throats. I zone out when they talk qbr, its not a real stat and its only something they use so it has no relevance to me. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 08:23 PM	#52
nannysuetle Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 480 Senior Member	which is BS. Harvin's yards would be double if Mcnabb could hit him in stride Everyone's would. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)