NFL Power Rankings, Week 5 - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**hexniks** · 11-10-2011, 07:20 PM

Vikings at 15? I'm a viking homer and I'd have them nowhere near 15...but overall, good list.

**Pinkman** · 11-10-2011, 07:35 PM

Chris Carter

I thought so

**Pinkman** · 11-10-2011, 07:36 PM

Where to begin.......

1.) Detroit doesn't have a top 5 WR.

Uh.......Calvin Johnson? Megatron?

2.) Minnesota. 16th.

3.) No, seriously. You have the Vikings ranked in the top half of the league after they managed to beat the Cardinals, the team you rank next to last. I really can't take anything else you say seriously if you rank the Vikings 16th. Sorry.

See post 16.

**amusaasyday** · 11-10-2011, 07:38 PM

#'s 1 and 32 are correct...

**esdfsdflast** · 11-10-2011, 08:06 PM

Where to begin.......

1.) Detroit doesn't have a top 5 WR.

Uh.......Calvin Johnson? Megatron?

2.) Minnesota. 16th.

3.) No, seriously. You have the Vikings ranked in the top half of the league after they managed to beat the Cardinals, the team you rank next to last. I really can't take anything else you say seriously if you rank the Vikings 16th. Sorry.

Point differential indicates they are much better than their 1-4 record. The loss to the Chiefs is disappointing. Detroit and San Diego are both very good teams.

**esdfsdflast** · 11-10-2011, 08:26 PM

Vikings at 15? I'm a viking homer and I'd have them nowhere near 15...but overall, good list.

They're 16th but point taken. I give them several points for the close games against SD and DET. But aside from that, I think with this win under their belt, things will change for them as far as the attitude in the locker room. After the 3 demoralizing losses to start the season, I think it was important for them to be able to get out to an early lead and finish the game. Now that they've done that, there will be no looking back.

**SzefciuCba** · 11-10-2011, 08:48 PM

Anyone who disagrees is welcome to add their own list, no?

Anyone that disagrees is welcome to choose not to as well.

**SzefciuCba** · 11-10-2011, 08:49 PM

Rankings no longer biased...but they are influenced.

So moses fails the litmus test again.

**herrdwq** · 11-10-2011, 08:53 PM

moses thread delivers.

**esdfsdflast** · 12-10-2011, 03:54 PM

moses thread delivers.

I didn't even get to bring up how McNabb is a proven winner whose veteran leadership is invaluable to the Vikings.

11-10-2011, 07:20 PM	#21
hexniks Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 581 Senior Member	Vikings at 15? I'm a viking homer and I'd have them nowhere near 15...but overall, good list. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 07:35 PM	#22
Pinkman Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 593 Senior Member	Chris Carter I thought so Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 07:36 PM	#23
Pinkman Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 593 Senior Member	Where to begin....... 1.) Detroit doesn't have a top 5 WR. Uh.......Calvin Johnson? Megatron? 2.) Minnesota. 16th. 3.) No, seriously. You have the Vikings ranked in the top half of the league after they managed to beat the Cardinals, the team you rank next to last. I really can't take anything else you say seriously if you rank the Vikings 16th. Sorry. See post 16. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 07:38 PM	#24
amusaasyday Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 566 Senior Member	#'s 1 and 32 are correct... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 08:06 PM	#25
esdfsdflast Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 466 Senior Member	Where to begin....... 1.) Detroit doesn't have a top 5 WR. Uh.......Calvin Johnson? Megatron? 2.) Minnesota. 16th. 3.) No, seriously. You have the Vikings ranked in the top half of the league after they managed to beat the Cardinals, the team you rank next to last. I really can't take anything else you say seriously if you rank the Vikings 16th. Sorry. Point differential indicates they are much better than their 1-4 record. The loss to the Chiefs is disappointing. Detroit and San Diego are both very good teams. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 08:26 PM	#26
esdfsdflast Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 466 Senior Member	Vikings at 15? I'm a viking homer and I'd have them nowhere near 15...but overall, good list. They're 16th but point taken. I give them several points for the close games against SD and DET. But aside from that, I think with this win under their belt, things will change for them as far as the attitude in the locker room. After the 3 demoralizing losses to start the season, I think it was important for them to be able to get out to an early lead and finish the game. Now that they've done that, there will be no looking back. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 08:48 PM	#27
SzefciuCba Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 544 Senior Member	Anyone who disagrees is welcome to add their own list, no? Anyone that disagrees is welcome to choose not to as well. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 08:49 PM	#28
SzefciuCba Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 544 Senior Member	Rankings no longer biased...but they are influenced. So moses fails the litmus test again. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-10-2011, 08:53 PM	#29
herrdwq Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	moses thread delivers. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-10-2011, 03:54 PM	#30
esdfsdflast Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 466 Senior Member	moses thread delivers. I didn't even get to bring up how McNabb is a proven winner whose veteran leadership is invaluable to the Vikings. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)