If Roethlisberger wins a 3rd Super Bowl... - Page 3 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Erunsenef** · 07-02-2011, 08:54 PM

Well, He lost.

Does that change peoples opinions??

He's been outplayed by the opposing QB in every SB. He is who I thought he was.

**bumxumer** · 07-02-2011, 09:40 PM

He's been outplayed by the opposing QB in every SB. He is who I thought he was.

He's never been the factor in the wins he had. Had he been the factor he would have an MVP.

**markbila** · 07-03-2011, 12:18 AM

He's never been the factor in the wins he had. Had he been the factor he would have an MVP.

Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.)

IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck.

**Progniusis** · 07-03-2011, 12:21 AM

He was terrible.

Absolutely terrible.

Big Ben Blows Goats

**SHaEFU0i** · 07-03-2011, 12:46 AM

Well, He lost.

Does that change peoples opinions??

His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible.

He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game.

**antonyandruleit** · 07-03-2011, 01:13 AM

Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.)

IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck.

all Pitt needed was our defense to suck.

**uncoodync** · 07-03-2011, 01:17 AM

Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.)

Thanks for speaking for all Steelers fans!!!

**RooxiaNof** · 07-03-2011, 01:24 AM

His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible.

He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game.

Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int?

**Essefsbyday** · 07-03-2011, 01:31 AM

Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int?

Forcing it into double coverage. He was also high on about 10 throws. He missed Wallace on an easy score, he had Paprah beat by 5 yards. He played worse than Jay Montana, he should have faked an injury.

**InsManKV** · 07-03-2011, 01:35 AM

certainly wasn't his best game........lots of blame to go around for the Steelers but what it breaks down to is that the Pack wanted it alot more and it showed.
they made the big plays when they had to etc.....

Pack played a real good game and are fully deserving to be the Champs.

**Stappipsy** · 07-03-2011, 02:09 AM

His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible.

He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game.

Wasn't that his best SB statistically?

**Repwailia** · 07-03-2011, 02:29 AM

Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int?

Wasn't the first one him trying to press his luck and throw a long one that got INT'd??

And i'm not giving him a pass on the second either....he- again- was pressing his luck and trying to go down the sideline into double coverage.

**glamourcitys** · 07-03-2011, 02:36 AM

Wasn't the first one him trying to press his luck and throw a long one that got INT'd??

And i'm not giving him a pass on the second either....he- again- was pressing his luck and trying to go down the sideline into double coverage.

His second interception was down the sideline?

**zlZ95pjt** · 07-03-2011, 03:15 AM

His second interception was down the sideline?

Wan't his second one the one where he got his arm hit and the guy he was trying to throw to was headed down the sideline...and the ball came up way short?

Neither INT was excusable. He wasn't completing passes anywhere near what a HoF'er should be even if he was on the losing side.

Ben Roethlisbergerthrows a second interception (to Jarrett Bush, this time) on a really horrible ball – Roethlisberger was clearly throwing into traffic the whole time.

http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/pitts...kers-superbowl

**teridbruse** · 07-03-2011, 03:31 AM

Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.)

IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck.

I do hear that shit a lot, but not all of us feel that way.

Obviously it was Bernie Williams doing the carrying.

**malishka1025** · 07-03-2011, 03:38 AM

Wan't his second one the one where he got his arm hit and the guy he was trying to throw to was headed down the sideline...and the ball came up way short?

Neither INT was excusable. He wasn't completing passes anywhere near what a HoF'er should be even if he was on the losing side.

Ben Roethlisbergerthrows a second interception (to Jarrett Bush, this time) on a really horrible ball – Roethlisberger was clearly throwing into traffic the whole time.

http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/pitts...kers-superbowl

I thought that was the first interception -- which was returned for a touchdown. I could be wrong.

**DrJonson** · 07-03-2011, 03:57 AM

I thought that was the first interception -- which was returned for a touchdown. I could be wrong.

Fear not, Im pretty sure youre right.

**wrefrinny** · 08-02-2011, 03:44 PM

I do hear that shit a lot, but not all of us feel that way.

Obviously it was Bernie Williams doing the carrying.

It's died down cause the Yankees stopped winning (and Jeter got old) but in 2000, I'm guessing you would object to ANY criticism of Jeter.
He won like 4 rings in 5 years or something? Ben winning 3 SB rings in 6 years would've been similar but it's a team sport.

07-02-2011, 08:54 PM	#41
Erunsenef Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	Well, He lost. Does that change peoples opinions?? He's been outplayed by the opposing QB in every SB. He is who I thought he was. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-02-2011, 09:40 PM	#42
bumxumer Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 510 Senior Member	He's been outplayed by the opposing QB in every SB. He is who I thought he was. He's never been the factor in the wins he had. Had he been the factor he would have an MVP. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 12:18 AM	#43
markbila Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 388 Senior Member	He's never been the factor in the wins he had. Had he been the factor he would have an MVP. Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.) IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 12:21 AM	#44
Progniusis Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	He was terrible. Absolutely terrible. Big Ben Blows Goats Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 12:46 AM	#45
SHaEFU0i Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	Well, He lost. Does that change peoples opinions?? His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible. He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 01:13 AM	#46
antonyandruleit Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 454 Senior Member	Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.) IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck. all Pitt needed was our defense to suck. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 01:17 AM	#47
uncoodync Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 556 Senior Member	Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.) Thanks for speaking for all Steelers fans!!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 01:24 AM	#48
RooxiaNof Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 552 Senior Member	His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible. He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game. Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 01:31 AM	#49
Essefsbyday Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int? Forcing it into double coverage. He was also high on about 10 throws. He missed Wallace on an easy score, he had Paprah beat by 5 yards. He played worse than Jay Montana, he should have faked an injury. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 01:35 AM	#50
InsManKV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 446 Senior Member	certainly wasn't his best game........lots of blame to go around for the Steelers but what it breaks down to is that the Pack wanted it alot more and it showed. they made the big plays when they had to etc..... Pack played a real good game and are fully deserving to be the Champs. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 02:09 AM	#51
Stappipsy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 410 Senior Member	His stats yesterday certainly made stepping away from any 'HoF' argument plausible. He was the cause of the loss, imo. Those two INT's (one a Pick-6) were the difference in the game. Wasn't that his best SB statistically? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 02:29 AM	#52
Repwailia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 533 Senior Member	Getting hit while releasing the ball, that was one of them. What was the cause of the other int? Wasn't the first one him trying to press his luck and throw a long one that got INT'd?? And i'm not giving him a pass on the second either....he- again- was pressing his luck and trying to go down the sideline into double coverage. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 02:36 AM	#53
glamourcitys Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 570 Senior Member	Wasn't the first one him trying to press his luck and throw a long one that got INT'd?? And i'm not giving him a pass on the second either....he- again- was pressing his luck and trying to go down the sideline into double coverage. His second interception was down the sideline? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 03:15 AM	#54
zlZ95pjt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 376 Senior Member	His second interception was down the sideline? Wan't his second one the one where he got his arm hit and the guy he was trying to throw to was headed down the sideline...and the ball came up way short? Neither INT was excusable. He wasn't completing passes anywhere near what a HoF'er should be even if he was on the losing side. Ben Roethlisbergerthrows a second interception (to Jarrett Bush, this time) on a really horrible ball – Roethlisberger was clearly throwing into traffic the whole time. http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/pitts...kers-superbowl Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 03:31 AM	#55
teridbruse Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 415 Senior Member	Pitt fans will just spew his postseason record at you and insist it's because of him. (Kinda like Yankees fans do with Jeter.) IMO, plenty of decent qb's could've helped win the game for Pitt last night. All Pitt needed was for Ben not to suck. I do hear that shit a lot, but not all of us feel that way. Obviously it was Bernie Williams doing the carrying. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

07-03-2011, 03:38 AM	#56
malishka1025 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 413 Senior Member	Wan't his second one the one where he got his arm hit and the guy he was trying to throw to was headed down the sideline...and the ball came up way short? Neither INT was excusable. He wasn't completing passes anywhere near what a HoF'er should be even if he was on the losing side. Ben Roethlisbergerthrows a second interception (to Jarrett Bush, this time) on a really horrible ball – Roethlisberger was clearly throwing into traffic the whole time. http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/pitts...kers-superbowl I thought that was the first interception -- which was returned for a touchdown. I could be wrong. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-03-2011, 03:57 AM	#57
DrJonson Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 411 Senior Member	I thought that was the first interception -- which was returned for a touchdown. I could be wrong. Fear not, Im pretty sure youre right. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-02-2011, 03:44 PM	#58
wrefrinny Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 583 Senior Member	I do hear that shit a lot, but not all of us feel that way. Obviously it was Bernie Williams doing the carrying. It's died down cause the Yankees stopped winning (and Jeter got old) but in 2000, I'm guessing you would object to ANY criticism of Jeter. He won like 4 rings in 5 years or something? Ben winning 3 SB rings in 6 years would've been similar but it's a team sport. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote