New Overtime Rules - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**ehib8yPc** · 08-01-2011, 08:57 PM

I believe the team losing the toss can on-side kick and then kick a FG to win, too.

That would be hilarious if that happened.

**bmwservis** · 08-01-2011, 09:01 PM

That would be hilarious if that happened.

I'd do it against Michael Vick. Their offense is big play, and shortening the field takes away protecting deep against the speedy recievers. If they dont score a TD, you still get the ball back.

**DiBellaBam** · 08-01-2011, 09:03 PM

I like Rodgers a little more than Vick. That's really it. Everything else feels like a crapshoot: two banged-up teams, two explosive passing offenses, two teams that wear green and love to commit dumb penalties, two coaches capable of a perplexing decision at any given time. That brings me to my one bold prediction for the weekend: Who better to break our virginity with the new overtime rules than Andy Reid and Mike McCarthy? Doesn't it have to play out that way? Throwing those semi-confusing overtime rules at Reid and McCarthy is going to be like cramming a hunk of peanut butter on the roof of a dog's mouth. I can't wait.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...s&sportCat=nfl

**Njxatsbf** · 11-01-2011, 02:37 PM

I can see these rule changes for the regular season.

In the playoffs, however, I dont know why they just dont play a full quarter. If after the first quarter and the game is not decided, go to A Shoot-Out or Penalty Kicks

Fixed

Might as well borrow as much as you can instead of just admitting the way you do it is wrong and the NCAA has it right.

08-01-2011, 08:57 PM	#21
ehib8yPc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 564 Senior Member	I believe the team losing the toss can on-side kick and then kick a FG to win, too. That would be hilarious if that happened. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-01-2011, 09:01 PM	#22
bmwservis Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 535 Senior Member	That would be hilarious if that happened. I'd do it against Michael Vick. Their offense is big play, and shortening the field takes away protecting deep against the speedy recievers. If they dont score a TD, you still get the ball back. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-01-2011, 09:03 PM	#23
DiBellaBam Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 368 Senior Member	I like Rodgers a little more than Vick. That's really it. Everything else feels like a crapshoot: two banged-up teams, two explosive passing offenses, two teams that wear green and love to commit dumb penalties, two coaches capable of a perplexing decision at any given time. That brings me to my one bold prediction for the weekend: Who better to break our virginity with the new overtime rules than Andy Reid and Mike McCarthy? Doesn't it have to play out that way? Throwing those semi-confusing overtime rules at Reid and McCarthy is going to be like cramming a hunk of peanut butter on the roof of a dog's mouth. I can't wait. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...s&sportCat=nfl Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-01-2011, 02:37 PM	#24
Njxatsbf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 507 Senior Member	I can see these rule changes for the regular season. In the playoffs, however, I dont know why they just dont play a full quarter. If after the first quarter and the game is not decided, go to A Shoot-Out or Penalty Kicks Fixed Might as well borrow as much as you can instead of just admitting the way you do it is wrong and the NCAA has it right. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)