HOF: Curtis Martin - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**carletoxtrs** · 04-01-2011, 10:44 PM

Over 14,000 yards rushing, 90s TDs.

Yes No?

**stuntduood** · 04-01-2011, 10:45 PM

Yes.

**Arrectiff** · 04-01-2011, 10:49 PM

yes

**C7JjVczP** · 04-01-2011, 10:53 PM

Agreed, he should undoubtedly get in. First ballot?

**resegooredo** · 04-01-2011, 10:57 PM

Agreed, he should undoubtedly get in. First ballot?

No. 2nd or 3rd. The numbers are good, rushing yardage he is top 5, and for TDs he is in the top 20.

I really dont have a legitimate reason for not being a 1st ballot just outside my opinion.

**Joircarm** · 04-01-2011, 11:24 PM

IMO If he could have had a career that didn't overlap Emmett & Barry, he would undoubtedly be 1st ballot... as he would have had all the hype to himself.

**Numbiydq** · 04-02-2011, 04:49 AM

Yes, 1st ballot.

**ashleyjoseph** · 06-01-2011, 07:30 PM

yes, but not first ballot.

**medifastwoman** · 06-01-2011, 08:20 PM

yes. as far as 1st ballot, i've never understood the prestige with it, if you're good enough to get in you're good enough to get in.

**Suvuseh** · 06-01-2011, 08:30 PM

yes. as far as 1st ballot, i've never understood the prestige with it, if you're good enough to get in you're good enough to get in.

Agreed, the whole thing is really gay. The body of work is the body of work regardless of how many years a player has been on the ballot.

04-01-2011, 10:44 PM	#1
carletoxtrs Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 436 Senior Member	HOF: Curtis Martin Over 14,000 yards rushing, 90s TDs. Yes No? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-01-2011, 10:45 PM	#2
stuntduood Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	Yes. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-01-2011, 10:49 PM	#3
Arrectiff Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 348 Senior Member	yes Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-01-2011, 10:53 PM	#4
C7JjVczP Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	Agreed, he should undoubtedly get in. First ballot? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-01-2011, 10:57 PM	#5
resegooredo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 462 Senior Member	Agreed, he should undoubtedly get in. First ballot? No. 2nd or 3rd. The numbers are good, rushing yardage he is top 5, and for TDs he is in the top 20. I really dont have a legitimate reason for not being a 1st ballot just outside my opinion. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-01-2011, 11:24 PM	#6
Joircarm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	IMO If he could have had a career that didn't overlap Emmett & Barry, he would undoubtedly be 1st ballot... as he would have had all the hype to himself. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

04-02-2011, 04:49 AM	#7
Numbiydq Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 568 Senior Member	Yes, 1st ballot. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-01-2011, 07:30 PM	#8
ashleyjoseph Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 433 Senior Member	yes, but not first ballot. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-01-2011, 08:20 PM	#9
medifastwoman Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 490 Senior Member	yes. as far as 1st ballot, i've never understood the prestige with it, if you're good enough to get in you're good enough to get in. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-01-2011, 08:30 PM	#10
Suvuseh Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 405 Senior Member	yes. as far as 1st ballot, i've never understood the prestige with it, if you're good enough to get in you're good enough to get in. Agreed, the whole thing is really gay. The body of work is the body of work regardless of how many years a player has been on the ballot. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)