Reply to Thread New Thread |
09-14-2010, 06:09 AM | #1 |
|
ever become unplayable?
After only one weekend of the NFL, the injury list already has two starting QBs on it (that rotary is aware of). Two torn ACLs from the GB/Philly game, another concussion, a torn bicep, and a broken hand. The NFL wants to go to 18 games. rotary LOVES the NFL, but these freaks of human beings have become so big, so fast, so strong & so well armoured in the most modern of lightweight composite materials, IS the game getting just TOO dangerous? What is the solution? Weight classes for each position? WHAT will the level of play be if the league DOES go to 18 games? Expanding the rosters at the bottom just adds players who will not make that much of a difference other than more bodies into the meat grinder that is the NFL. |
|
09-14-2010, 06:23 AM | #5 |
|
Rally Killer thinks Rotary's being a little over-dramatic. There's injuries every year and a lot of them. But Rally Killer doesn't think they need to make the season any longer. 16-19 Games is plenty. Dont think for a minute the NFL isnt just 'a bit' concerned over a glut of injuries already. It doesnt do their argument ANY good to expand the season to 18 games. If a player gets through the regular season with only the requisite 'bumps and bruises', its luck and nothing more. |
|
09-14-2010, 06:42 AM | #8 |
|
Over dramatic? Really? Its just a fact. Even you say so. |
|
09-14-2010, 01:12 PM | #9 |
|
I'm just trying to figure out where this sudden revelation came from that football players get injured. Its a point of fact that the NFL season is a meat grinder. 'Tackling', for the most part, has been replaced by high speed collisions akin to being in a car accident. To think that someone couldnt die on the playing field as a result of one them is just naive. IF that ever happens, this little discussion will be getting visited on a much more broader scale by people who legislate things far more important than what happens on a football field. ** shrugs ** All that said, the NFL doesnt need to expand to 18 games. Its fine at 16 but the $$$ thats at stake will make it all but impossible to keep it from happening. |
|
09-14-2010, 01:29 PM | #10 |
|
ever become unplayable? I agree with the feeling one can take from that GB/Philly game....it was brutal in the first half. That said the new concussion rules are intriguing (putting aside the Eagles letting Stewart Bradley back on the field for a snap or two). I think that is one aspect you will see.....the stronger rules around re-entry from injuries, not just concussions but many injuries. |
|
09-14-2010, 06:27 PM | #11 |
|
Who said its a sudden revelation? |
|
09-14-2010, 06:34 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
09-14-2010, 06:35 PM | #13 |
|
I'll expound on Rotary's post, because the thought intrigued me.
I went and watched a Dick Butkus highlight reel. And then Ray Nitschke. And Jack Lambert. One thing you don't see these guys do but RARELY is lead in with their shoulder or helmet with their hands under their chests. They're always going in *vertical*, wrapping up as they get to their target, with both arms around the ball carrier. They were known as the meanest, most vicious sons-a-bitches in the history of the game, but the videos you watch show that their gameplay was much more geared towards making effective tackles than physically punishing a player. Make no mistake, the game was still *violent*, and yes, plenty of people got injured, and often badly. But I think the point is that 270 pound guys who can run 4.5 40's who are wearing composite body armor that's 5 times better than the *pads* they wore in the 50's and earlier are going to cause more, and worse, injuries. As they make the helmet better at protecting the head, they also make it a more effective weapon on the field of play. I'm not saying there's some huge change that needs to be made, it's just a matter of fact when you have bigger, faster, stronger athletes, and couple that with the fact that the way the game is played has changed. *TACKLING* is a lost art, in my opinion. It would be interesting to do a comparison study from say, 1950 to like 2009, and see what percentage of players suffered injuries that ended their season or caused them to miss significant playing time to see if any of my theories hold up. |
|
09-14-2010, 06:36 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
09-14-2010, 06:46 PM | #15 |
|
|
|
09-14-2010, 08:47 PM | #16 |
|
Two concussions. And, I only remember one ACL.....wasnt Grant just a sprained ankle? |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|