LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-03-2010, 01:23 AM   #1
LeviBrawn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
638
Senior Member
Default NFL "All Decade Team"
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/n...0110?GT1=39002

Feagles is a snub? Srsly?
LeviBrawn is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 01:28 AM   #2
movlabk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Belichick shouldn't be on there. He fucking cheated and got caught and he's named to the all decade team? Give me a fucking break.
movlabk is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 01:39 AM   #3
addisonnicogel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Also, I personally would have put Clinton Portis on over Jamal Lewis.
addisonnicogel is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 01:42 AM   #4
RSAccountssy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
363
Senior Member
Default
Belichick shouldn't be on there. He fucking cheated and got caught and he's named to the all decade team? Give me a fucking break.
This.

Should be Dungy and Cowher, but how Cowher got left off in the first place is another question that bears asking.
RSAccountssy is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 06:30 AM   #5
arraxylap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
Feagles! Best punter maybe of all time! wtf! discuss!





arraxylap is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 06:39 AM   #6
majestictwelve

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
Feagles! Best punter maybe of all time! wtf! discuss!





I remember when he was a youngin with the Eagles.
majestictwelve is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 06:46 AM   #7
Roker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
I remember when he was a rookie with the Eagles.
Was he pinnin everyone inside the 10 back then too?
Roker is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 07:00 AM   #8
ranndomderr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Was he pinnin everyone inside the 10 back then too?
Not as much. He was a good, but not great punter. Really got alot better as he got older.
ranndomderr is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 07:01 AM   #9
XinordiX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
This.

Should be Dungy and Cowher, but how Cowher got left off in the first place is another question that bears asking.
Perhaps whoever decided this thought they were voting on the "All Dickhead Team."
XinordiX is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 07:08 AM   #10
CorpoRasion

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
Not as much. He was a good, but not great punter. Really got alot better as he got older.
Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ...
CorpoRasion is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 07:09 AM   #11
NicolasOL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Perhaps whoever decided this thought they were voting on the "All Dickhead Team."
Oh .. oh I see what ya did there ...
NicolasOL is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 07:15 AM   #12
indianstory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
532
Senior Member
Default
Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ...
There's absolutely no way Lechler was not going to be on the team. As for the second punter on the list, I'm not sure anyone really cares all that much. Moorman has a better average than Feagles, but more importantly, he has a 117.9 career passer rating. The guy is sick.

If Feagles were on it, I wouldn't feel like Moorman got snubbed. They're punters, though. Does it really matter in the long run? Also -- I'm surprised Akers made it.
indianstory is offline


Old 02-02-2010, 08:30 AM   #13
EasyLOAD

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
There's absolutely no way Lechler was not going to be on the team. As for the second punter on the list, I'm not sure anyone really cares all that much. Moorman has a better average than Feagles, but more importantly, he has a 117.9 career passer rating. The guy is sick.

If Feagles were on it, I wouldn't feel like Moorman got snubbed. They're punters, though. Does it really matter in the long run? Also -- I'm surprised Akers made it.
Akers was steady. My biggest fantasy pt getter this yr. +
EasyLOAD is offline


Old 02-02-2010, 12:23 PM   #14
Giselle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ...
Feagles only outperformed Moorman and Lechler on a year-by-year basis (in terms of top 10 finishes, I'm not doing more research on punters) in punts inside the 20. In yards and net yards, Feagles gets smoked by both Moorman and Lechler, and Feagles only had one top-10 net yards season after 2002. Lechler had 7, Moorman had 6, Feagles had 4.

Hard to argue that a guy with less yards, a lower average, and a lower net average belongs ahead of a guy who competed in similar weather conditions.
Giselle is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity