Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-03-2010, 01:23 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 01:39 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 01:42 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 06:39 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 07:00 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 07:08 AM | #10 |
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 07:15 AM | #12 |
|
Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ... If Feagles were on it, I wouldn't feel like Moorman got snubbed. They're punters, though. Does it really matter in the long run? Also -- I'm surprised Akers made it. |
|
02-02-2010, 08:30 AM | #13 |
|
There's absolutely no way Lechler was not going to be on the team. As for the second punter on the list, I'm not sure anyone really cares all that much. Moorman has a better average than Feagles, but more importantly, he has a 117.9 career passer rating. The guy is sick. |
|
02-02-2010, 12:23 PM | #14 |
|
Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ... Hard to argue that a guy with less yards, a lower average, and a lower net average belongs ahead of a guy who competed in similar weather conditions. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|