[ananciguinter]

I'll take silence as your agreement.

Or it's so ridiculous that it merits no comment. Take your pick.

[YpciJQdo]

Or it's so ridiculous that it merits no comment. Take your pick.

We both know it's not 'so ridiculous'

[medprof]

We both know it's not 'so ridiculous'

Packers and Bears have been rivals for twice as long as Dallas has even been a team.

[TainuibeFaimb]

Both are big games imo, the Viking rivalry has intensified with farve in purple. Normally, I care more about beating the bears but this year was different for obvious reasons.

I rooted for the bears a few weeks ago vs minny cause I hate farve.

And Detroit doesn't count...poor lions.

I live in MN, so I care more about beating the vikings. Always.

[HakSpeame]

I would say that the Bears are a bigger rivalry due to the length of time the rivalry has been in place. However, the last decade has seen the Vikes and Pack near the top of the NFCN more frequently and has been a big rivalry in recent memory. The lions...we just feel sorry about what they have to watch.

[ftqwhbvxlcfop]

Mr. Kobe hates the Bears more and I hate the Vikes more. His reason is because his best friend is a Bears fan and talks a lot of shit. My reason is because my aunt is a Pack fan and talks a lot of shit.

I think it depends on the person.

[QqJamxqP]

Mr. Kobe hates the Bears more and I hate the Vikes more. His reason is because his best friend is a Bears fan and talks a lot of shit. My reason is because my aunt is a Pack fan and talks a lot of shit.

I think it depends on the person.

You...you..hate the Vikes?

[budumol]

You...you..hate the Vikes?

I suppose that depends on the day.

Oops.

[Kk21pwa9]

Packers and Bears have been rivals for twice as long as Dallas has even been a team.

Game. Set. Match.

[Gymngatagaica]

Sadly I have to agree with Phila.

The NFC East has better rivalries then the NFC North.

I will also take the blame for that. The lions havent really held up their end of the bargin and really dont bring much to the table. They've been the red headed step child since the 50's.

Pretty much any NFC East match up is a hate fest.

[vNQmO2BF]

Sadly I have to agree with Phila.

The NFC East has better rivalries then the NFC North.

I will also take the blame for that. The lions havent really held up their end of the bargin and really dont bring much to the table. They've been the red headed step child since the 50's.

Pretty much any NFC East match up is a hate fest.

I agree as well. The Pack/Bears is fierce, the Vikes/Pack is fierce and the Bears/Vikes is pretty heated. I wouldn't say the Lions matchups are ever really heated.

In addition to missing a 4th team for the rivalry party, considering Philly fans are generally the angriest set of people I've ever met, I'd have to say the rivalries in that division trump the North overall.

[fuesquemill]

Mr. Kobe hates the Bears more and I hate the Vikes more. His reason is because his best friend is a Bears fan and talks a lot of shit. My reason is because my aunt is a Pack fan and talks a lot of shit.

I think it depends on the person.

That better wind up in your sig, Kobes.

[tipoketpu]

Game. Set. Match.

Uhh. Yeah ok.

[ReneCM]

That better wind up in your sig, Kobes.

Long day.

[VtLe67WR]

Sorry, the hatred is there for pretty much all teams in the division. Not really the case in the NFC North.

Cowboys and Redskins > Packers and Bears
Cowboys and Eagles > Packers and Vikings
Giants and Eagles > Bears and Vikings

---

Cowboys and Giants > Packers and Lions
Eagles and Redskins > Bears and Lions
Redskins and Giants > Vikings and Lions

Not really anything to really even argue about.

Are you kidding me? The two longest running series in the NFL are in the NFC North. The Bears and the Packers and the Lions and the Packers. The hatred and rivalries are as old as the hills. It's not our fault the Lions organization has been a sub-par high school after school program for so many years. No offense to Lions fans as I feel your pain. For the most part, the division didn't get much of a start until the 60s. The NFC North got its start in the 1910s and 20s. If you go talk to some old man in Green Bay or Chicago they'll be ready to throttle you in a heartbeat if you talk ill of their teams in favor of the other one. History is on the side of the NFC North.

As far as I'm concerned with who I hate more, it goes as such...

Right now I've hated the Vikes the most for the last ten years or so considering the two teams have been the most evenly matched over that period of time. Then come the bears as they've had a few competitive years since 1985 and even another SB appearance. Right now considering the state of the organization it's hard to have much vigor in my hate for them. To me Lovey telling us his priority every year is to beat the Packers just doesn't instill much rage in me. He doesn't fire me up in the least. Of course, neither does McCarthy for that matter. The Lions bring up the rear for obvious reasons. I really wish there was a way to make Ford sell the team to bring in a group that will transform the organization into a competitive team. Not gonna happen, though.

[LClan439]

Packers and Bears have been rivals for twice as long as Dallas has even been a team.

The thing he doesn't understand, Vegas, is that the Packers and Bears in the old days were both capable of winning a championship. Even in the modern era both have won Superbowls.

Names like 'Halas' and 'Lombardi' far surpass names like uhhh.......
(psst, what *have* the Eagles won and when???)

[zlopikanikanza]

You...you..hate the Vikes?

Favre can make a Vikes fan do that subconsciously.

[Nubtoubrem]

The thing he doesn't understand, Vegas, is that the Packers and Bears in the old days were both capable of winning a championship. Even in the modern era both have won Superbowls.

Names like 'Halas' and 'Lombardi' far surpass names like uhhh.......
(psst, what *have* the Eagles won and when???)

I know the Eagles don't have one, but can you break down Super Bowls by division for me?

History is fine and dandy, but what happened in the early 1900's doesn't have bearing on what the best rivalries NOW are. NFC East definitely has the best. All four teams hate each other. Who hates the Lions?

[qwerty1]

I know the Eagles don't have one, but can you break down Super Bowls by division for me?

Please don't try to take credit for what the Giants, Cowboys and Redskins have accomplished.

In the NFC North (heck, in the old NFC Central) ALL the teams have been to the SB multiple times or won it with the exception of the Lions.

And if you go back to the pre-SB days, The Bears and Pack have World Championships under their belt.

The Eagles have batteries...and Santa.

[denyffishh]

Please don't try to take credit for what the Giants, Cowboys and Redskins have accomplished.

In the NFC North (heck, in the old NFC Central) ALL the teams have been to the SB multiple times or won it with the exception of the Lions.

And if you go back to the pre-SB days, The Bears and Pack have World Championships under their belt.

The Eagles have batteries...and Santa.

So the NFC East shouldn't take credit for what the NFC East had accomplished? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you'd make an argument like that.

If you go back past the Super Bowl era then all of the NFC East teams have championships too. Two horrid arguments from you. Nice work. And the Vikings haven't won the Super Bowl. Only the Packers and Bears have. And they have far less than the NFC East teams.