LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-30-2009, 06:40 AM   #21
provigil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Fletcher and Beason.
provigil is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 06:41 AM   #22
Rellshare

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Brent Celek.
Rellshare is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:13 PM   #23
elalmhicabalp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default
Ryan Grant, Clay Matthews, Jermichael Finley
elalmhicabalp is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:15 PM   #24
adesseridopaw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
defensively in the NFC for sure.
are you really agreeing to your own post?
adesseridopaw is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:17 PM   #25
Aztegjpl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
560
Senior Member
Default
Janikowski
Aztegjpl is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:17 PM   #26
BoBoMasterDesign

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
How do neither of Bengal's DB's make it?
BoBoMasterDesign is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:18 PM   #27
NvrNoNowX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
Darrius Heyward-Bey
NvrNoNowX is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:36 PM   #28
JediReturns84

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
are you really agreeing to your own post?
no. weirdo.

pointing out that he may not be the biggest snub overall, but at least the biggest NFC defensive snub.
JediReturns84 is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:41 PM   #29
BCVB9SOc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Fletcher and Beason.
I agree. I understand team success plays a part (although it shouldn't), but no one can convince me Vilma had a better year than either of those guys.
BCVB9SOc is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:43 PM   #30
feroiodpiop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
no. weirdo.

pointing out that he may not be the biggest snub overall, but at least the biggest NFC defensive snub.
He's an alternate and I wouldnt say biggest snub...although I probably would've put him on the squad.

I sure as hell wouldnt put mckinnie or Hutch, and I would've said that two weeks ago as well.

Fan voting is retarded
feroiodpiop is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:44 PM   #31
gedsiz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
391
Senior Member
Default
He's an alternate and I wouldnt say biggest snub...although I probably would've put him on the squad.

I sure as hell wouldnt put mckinnie or Hutch, and I would've said that two weeks ago as well.

Fan voting is retarded
gimme a bigger snub.
gedsiz is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:51 PM   #32
nonDosearrany

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
gimme a bigger snub.
Jarret Bush
nonDosearrany is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:54 PM   #33
ddwayspd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
571
Senior Member
Default
I'd say Beason is a bigger snub.
ddwayspd is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:05 PM   #34
chipkluchi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
I'd say Beason is a bigger snub.
he does have more tackles, but the Claymaker has 3 times as many sacks.
chipkluchi is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:06 PM   #35
cwgwowcom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
he does have more tackles, but the Claymaker has 3 times as many sacks.
beason also has 3 int's to clay's 0.
cwgwowcom is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:26 PM   #36
appleiphoneees

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
541
Senior Member
Default
Okay.

This hurts.

Nick Barnett.

Okay. Now I can breathe.

Cullen Jenkins, even that druggie Johnny Jolly. Seriously, the Packers run defense is awesome, yet they are only sending DBs?

Of course Caly Matthews should be there. But once again, it would be based on his pass defense- pass rushing.
appleiphoneees is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:27 PM   #37
ashleyjoseph

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Okay.

This hurts.

Nick Barnett.

Okay. Now I can breathe.

Cullen Jenkins, even that druggie Johnny Jolly. Seriously, the Packers run defense is awesome, yet they are only sending DBs?

Of coure Caly Matthews should be there. But once again, it would be based on his pass defense- pass rushing.
Why not just the entire packer defense?
ashleyjoseph is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:42 PM   #38
arindiruppya

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
576
Senior Member
Default
Why not just the entire packer defense?
I don't watch any other teams. But I'll give you this guys opinion.


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Outside linebackers: DeMarcus Ware, Dallas; Clay Matthews, Green Bay; Lance Briggs, Chicago
Comment: Ware is a dominant force and incredibly tough. Although Matthews is a rookie, he has performed like a seasoned pro and makes himself a strong candidate for defensive rookie of the year. Briggs is a consistent playmaker on an inconsistent defense.



A defensive end in a 3-4 scheme is supposed to be one of the guys who sacrifices his individual accomplishments to help linebackers make all the plays. However, that isn't the case with Green Bay's Cullen Jenkins. Sure, he's a team guy who plays the scheme as it is designed, and, consequently, does his part to keep blockers away from the Packers' linebackers. Yet, Jenkins also is a playmaker himself. For the season, he has 4.5 sacks, three forced fumbles, and an interception.


Plus Johnny Jolly I beleive had the most batted passes this year. Along with stellar run support and an interception.
arindiruppya is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:46 PM   #39
BebopVT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
I don't watch any other teams. But I'll give you this guys opinion.


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Outside linebackers: DeMarcus Ware, Dallas; Clay Matthews, Green Bay; Lance Briggs, Chicago
Comment: Ware is a dominant force and incredibly tough. Although Matthews is a rookie, he has performed like a seasoned pro and makes himself a strong candidate for defensive rookie of the year. Briggs is a consistent playmaker on an inconsistent defense.


A defensive end in a 3-4 scheme is supposed to be one of the guys who sacrifices his individual accomplishments to help linebackers make all the plays. However, that isn't the case with Green Bay's Cullen Jenkins. Sure, he's a team guy who plays the scheme as it is designed, and, consequently, does his part to keep blockers away from the Packers' linebackers. Yet, Jenkins also is a playmaker himself. For the season, he has 4.5 sacks, three forced fumbles, and an interception.


Plus Johnny Jolly I beleive had the most batted passes this year. Along with stellar run support and an interception.
Ok, who would jenkin's and Jolly replace?

Peppers, 5 forced fumbles and 10.5 sacks?
Jared Allen? 4 FF 13.5 sacks 1 int and 1 td
Trent Cole 2 FF 12.5 sacks?
BebopVT is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 04:52 PM   #40
gSjQEEmq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
Ok, who would jenkin's and Jolly replace?

Peppers, 5 forced fumbles and 10.5 sacks?
Jared Allen? 4 FF 13.5 sacks 1 int and 1 td
Trent Cole 2 FF 12.5 sacks?
All of them. I only saw Allen play the Packers revovling-door tackles, Colledge and Babre. so he got 7.5 sacks. throw out at leat 4 of those.

Never see the Eagles play unless there's the potential of McNabb puking on his lineman.

Nobody on Carolina should be anywhere near a Pro Bowl.

But its the Probowl, gotta fill the roster with players who will be watching the Super Bowl.

You know, Peppers, Drew Brees, Favre, etc...
gSjQEEmq is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity