Pats vs Colts - Page 3 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**hubua990** · 11-16-2009, 08:27 PM

I mean I hate Belichick, but I think the ref thought he juggled it twice, when it was really once. It was his fault he didn't have any challenges left. I still think if it was a reveiw, they might have given him the first down.

**chootsonege** · 11-16-2009, 08:40 PM

He wasn't juggling it when he was at the 30. It was a poor spot.

doesnt matter.

**CefGemYAffews** · 11-16-2009, 08:50 PM

doesnt matter.

Sure it does. Bad spot.

Not my problem though.

**TimoPizaz** · 11-16-2009, 09:00 PM

Sure it does. Bad spot.

Not my problem though.

From the sounds of it, if a receiver is juggling the ball at all on the way down, the spot of the ball will be where he was downed. If that is indeed the rule, then you don't have an argument.

**homerdienru** · 11-16-2009, 09:03 PM

From the sounds of it, if a receiver is juggling the ball at all on the way down, the spot of the ball will be where he was downed. If that is indeed the rule, then you don't have an argument.

Did you see the play? Because it doesn't sound like you have.

**suidinguilelf** · 11-16-2009, 09:05 PM

Did you see the play? Because it doesn't sound like you have.

I saw the play. It fits my description. Did you see it?

**pitoufsd** · 11-16-2009, 09:11 PM

I mean I hate Belichick, but I think the ref thought he juggled it twice, when it was really once. It was his fault he didn't have any challenges left. I still think if it was a reveiw, they might have given him the first down.

Where did he make a football move once he established possession? Recall that simply getting two feet down and having control isn't enough for a reception by NFL standards (if you believe that the NFL doesn't have vendettas against certain teams).

**ELURNSERB** · 11-16-2009, 11:24 PM

I saw the play. It fits my description. Did you see it?

When you said by the sounds of it, I thought you were basing that off my argument or something.

At first he obviously is juggling it, but when it left foot hit the 30 yard, he had possession and that ball is clearly over the 30 yard line, IMO.

**cl004** · 11-17-2009, 12:07 AM

When you said by the sounds of it, I thought you were basing that off my argument or something.

At first he obviously is juggling it, but when it left foot hit the 30 yard, he had possession and that ball is clearly over the 30 yard line, IMO.

ya but that's the problem it was just the left foot, he doesn't have possession till he lands on his back.

11-16-2009, 08:27 PM	#41
hubua990 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 476 Senior Member	I mean I hate Belichick, but I think the ref thought he juggled it twice, when it was really once. It was his fault he didn't have any challenges left. I still think if it was a reveiw, they might have given him the first down. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 08:40 PM	#42
chootsonege Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	He wasn't juggling it when he was at the 30. It was a poor spot. doesnt matter. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 08:50 PM	#43
CefGemYAffews Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 423 Senior Member	doesnt matter. Sure it does. Bad spot. Not my problem though. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 09:00 PM	#44
TimoPizaz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 420 Senior Member	Sure it does. Bad spot. Not my problem though. From the sounds of it, if a receiver is juggling the ball at all on the way down, the spot of the ball will be where he was downed. If that is indeed the rule, then you don't have an argument. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 09:03 PM	#45
homerdienru Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 390 Senior Member	From the sounds of it, if a receiver is juggling the ball at all on the way down, the spot of the ball will be where he was downed. If that is indeed the rule, then you don't have an argument. Did you see the play? Because it doesn't sound like you have. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 09:05 PM	#46
suidinguilelf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 409 Senior Member	Did you see the play? Because it doesn't sound like you have. I saw the play. It fits my description. Did you see it? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 09:11 PM	#47
pitoufsd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 571 Senior Member	I mean I hate Belichick, but I think the ref thought he juggled it twice, when it was really once. It was his fault he didn't have any challenges left. I still think if it was a reveiw, they might have given him the first down. Where did he make a football move once he established possession? Recall that simply getting two feet down and having control isn't enough for a reception by NFL standards (if you believe that the NFL doesn't have vendettas against certain teams). Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2009, 11:24 PM	#48
ELURNSERB Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 532 Senior Member	I saw the play. It fits my description. Did you see it? When you said by the sounds of it, I thought you were basing that off my argument or something. At first he obviously is juggling it, but when it left foot hit the 30 yard, he had possession and that ball is clearly over the 30 yard line, IMO. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-17-2009, 12:07 AM	#49
cl004 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 483 Senior Member	When you said by the sounds of it, I thought you were basing that off my argument or something. At first he obviously is juggling it, but when it left foot hit the 30 yard, he had possession and that ball is clearly over the 30 yard line, IMO. ya but that's the problem it was just the left foot, he doesn't have possession till he lands on his back. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)