Overtime Rules - Page 3 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**HunterM** · 11-09-2009, 08:27 PM

Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer?

so just eliminate FG's so teams with a better kicker dont have an advantage...

**RokeIdeadioke** · 11-09-2009, 08:27 PM

Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer?

thats a retarded rebuttal.

**VyacheslaV** · 11-09-2009, 08:28 PM

not in games I watch.

Then again I dont have charles the mugger woodson on my team.

no you dont have anyone good in your secondary.

**occurrini** · 11-09-2009, 08:30 PM

no you dont have anyone good in your secondary.

LMAO!

Anyways Dom, I like your idea. Personally, I dont see anything wrong with the way its done now, but if it had to change, then I'd like your plan just fine.

**mobiphones** · 11-09-2009, 08:31 PM

no you dont have anyone good in your secondary.

just winfield who's a probowler and madieu williams

**Emalodoulouts** · 11-09-2009, 08:33 PM

Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer?

10 - 13 OT win by the Steelers

Reed 2-2 FGs (1 in OT)
Bironas 1-3 FGs (0 in OT)

So, going back to regulation, the kicker was the pivotal player. Football? Foot, seems like the emphasis would be on kicking.

**Galsteinbok** · 11-09-2009, 08:36 PM

just winfield who's a probowler and madieu williams

damn, shes big.

**JonatonM** · 11-09-2009, 08:36 PM

thats a retarded rebuttal.

To a retarded critique.

What goes around comes around.

**Garry Richardson** · 11-09-2009, 08:37 PM

damn, shes big.

he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there.

**VIAGRA-VIAGRA** · 11-09-2009, 08:37 PM

Perhaps we should do without the end zone, and just have kickers score the points.

**CibQueersejer** · 11-09-2009, 08:38 PM

To a retarded critique.

What goes around comes around.

yeah, but since you are retarded it shouldve seem like a normal critique.

**TheBest-Host** · 11-09-2009, 08:39 PM

he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there.

LMFAO!

you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year?

**Anamehuskeene** · 11-09-2009, 08:39 PM

he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there.

Next your are gonna tell us that Favre is better then Rodgers

**mobiphones** · 11-09-2009, 08:39 PM

Perhaps we should do without the end zone, and just have kickers score the points.

perhaps we just make everyone a winner.

**Yb4bulVR** · 11-09-2009, 08:39 PM

LMFAO!

you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year?

Actually I think it was 6

**12Dvop4I** · 11-09-2009, 08:41 PM

LMFAO!

you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year?

so he's a good return man?!?

**bxxasxxa** · 11-09-2009, 08:41 PM

so he's a good return man?!?

better than hester, that is for sure.

**Clielldub** · 11-09-2009, 08:43 PM

Next your are gonna tell us that Favre is better then Rodgers

not at all. I've said Rodgers is best in NFCN for sometime.

**jenilopaz** · 11-09-2009, 08:45 PM

not at all. I've said Rodgers is best in NFCN for sometime.

tallest midget

means nothing

**colmedindustry** · 11-09-2009, 08:46 PM

perhaps we just make everyone a winner.

Sure, but that's not what I'm suggesting.

TDs = 6 points (+1 usually).
FGs = 3 points.

In OT, FGs have an inflated value. Check out the last 10 or 15 overtime games. How many were won with a TD?

11-09-2009, 08:27 PM	#1
HunterM Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 366 Senior Member	Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer? so just eliminate FG's so teams with a better kicker dont have an advantage... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:27 PM	#2
RokeIdeadioke Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 569 Senior Member	Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer? thats a retarded rebuttal. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:28 PM	#3
VyacheslaV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 438 Senior Member	not in games I watch. Then again I dont have charles the mugger woodson on my team. no you dont have anyone good in your secondary. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:30 PM	#4
occurrini Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 427 Senior Member	no you dont have anyone good in your secondary. LMAO! Anyways Dom, I like your idea. Personally, I dont see anything wrong with the way its done now, but if it had to change, then I'd like your plan just fine. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:31 PM	#5
mobiphones Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 546 Senior Member	no you dont have anyone good in your secondary. just winfield who's a probowler and madieu williams Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:33 PM	#6
Emalodoulouts Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 421 Senior Member	Why do we need to have the kicker be the pivotal player in OT? What is this, soccer? 10 - 13 OT win by the Steelers Reed 2-2 FGs (1 in OT) Bironas 1-3 FGs (0 in OT) So, going back to regulation, the kicker was the pivotal player. Football? Foot, seems like the emphasis would be on kicking. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:36 PM	#7
Galsteinbok Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 548 Senior Member	just winfield who's a probowler and madieu williams damn, shes big. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:36 PM	#8
JonatonM Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	thats a retarded rebuttal. To a retarded critique. What goes around comes around. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:37 PM	#9
Garry Richardson Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 431 Senior Member	damn, shes big. he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:37 PM	#10
VIAGRA-VIAGRA Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 528 Senior Member	Perhaps we should do without the end zone, and just have kickers score the points. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:38 PM	#11
CibQueersejer Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 361 Senior Member	To a retarded critique. What goes around comes around. yeah, but since you are retarded it shouldve seem like a normal critique. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:39 PM	#12
TheBest-Host Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there. LMFAO! you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:39 PM	#13
Anamehuskeene Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	he's a pretty good safety, better then any of the chumps pack line up back there. Next your are gonna tell us that Favre is better then Rodgers Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:39 PM	#15
Yb4bulVR Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 549 Senior Member	LMFAO! you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year? Actually I think it was 6 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:41 PM	#16
12Dvop4I Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 549 Senior Member	LMFAO! you mean like that chump Collins that returned what? 5 picks for tds last year? so he's a good return man?!? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

11-09-2009, 08:41 PM	#17
bxxasxxa Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 414 Senior Member	so he's a good return man?!? better than hester, that is for sure. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:43 PM	#18
Clielldub Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 518 Senior Member	Next your are gonna tell us that Favre is better then Rodgers not at all. I've said Rodgers is best in NFCN for sometime. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:45 PM	#19
jenilopaz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 399 Senior Member	not at all. I've said Rodgers is best in NFCN for sometime. tallest midget means nothing Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-09-2009, 08:46 PM	#20
colmedindustry Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 344 Senior Member	perhaps we just make everyone a winner. Sure, but that's not what I'm suggesting. TDs = 6 points (+1 usually). FGs = 3 points. In OT, FGs have an inflated value. Check out the last 10 or 15 overtime games. How many were won with a TD? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote