Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-09-2009, 11:19 PM | #41 |
|
|
|
04-09-2009, 11:21 PM | #42 |
|
|
|
04-09-2009, 11:24 PM | #43 |
|
I've never understood the big to do over that. All it shows me is he's leaving it all out on the field. Conditioning issue? I don't think so. |
|
05-09-2009, 08:16 AM | #44 |
|
|
|
05-09-2009, 08:25 AM | #45 |
|
i believe there was a thread where you were bitching about how eagles fans think very little of eli. What I mean by not waiving the Eli flag is that I won't sit here and tell you he's an elite QB or that he is better than McNabb, but he isn't nearly bad as people say he is. Numbers don't tell the whole story. This season should tell us a lot about Eli. He has his money, but no Plax. |
|
05-09-2009, 10:28 AM | #46 |
|
Right and swayed Moses and several others of your ilk into putting Eli in your top 10 QBs in the league. |
|
05-09-2009, 05:44 PM | #47 |
|
|
|
05-09-2009, 06:21 PM | #49 |
|
|
|
05-09-2009, 06:47 PM | #50 |
|
No, no, I have been. A thousand yard season 3 years ago doesn't qualify someone as a "legit" starter. I think it has to do with Viking fans on S-B are homers. Taylor would have 3 consecutive very good seasons if it weren't for AP. And you can be ridiculous and say if he were good the Vikes wouldn't have drafted AP, but AP is the type of player you don't pass on in the draft. Similar to when the Vikes had one of the best receiving duos in the league and still drafted Randy Moss. |
|
05-09-2009, 07:27 PM | #51 |
|
So says the guy stating a trio of RB's that includes a guy with 500 career rushing yards and a guy with a handful of carries in the NFL after a couple seasons. Taylor would have 3 consecutive very good seasons if it weren't for AP. And you can be ridiculous and say if he were good the Vikes wouldn't have drafted AP, but AP is the type of player you don't pass on in the draft. Similar to when the Vikes had one of the best receiving duos in the league and still drafted Randy Moss. |
|
05-09-2009, 07:34 PM | #52 |
|
Who a 10 year vet (Carter) and Robert Tate? Moss fell to the Vikes, like the AD selection, their wasn't much strategy involved in that pick. I guess you make a good point though. I can see why, after your receiving tandem sets an NFL record for consecutive thousand yard seasons as a tandem, you'd think that those receivers aren't very good. For what it's worth, at the time, Tate was somewhere around 4th/5th receiver on the squad. |
|
05-09-2009, 07:40 PM | #53 |
|
The Vikings had Cris Carter, someone who became arguably one of the best receivers in NFL history, as well as Jake Reed, who prior to Moss being drafted, only had five consecutive thousand yard receiving seasons. And I forgot all about Jake Reed. Tate just seemed like he was around forever. |
|
05-09-2009, 07:44 PM | #54 |
|
WRs so good, they didn't see the need to make the playoffs. Especially since the Vikings made the playoffs 5 of 6 years between 92-97... Including a 1997 wild card game where the Vikings, down 13-22 with 90 seconds left, beat the Giants 23-22. I can see where you'd come up with the insinuation that the Vikings weren't making the playoffs. Must've slipped my mind. |
|
05-09-2009, 08:00 PM | #55 |
|
Correct you are. Either way, Chester Taylor is not a legit starter. |
|
05-09-2009, 08:18 PM | #56 |
|
Yes, so says the guy with a trio of RBs running behind the best OL in the NFL on the team with one the best run games in football last year. I didn't say they where they should be ranked or make some bogus claim... like Chester Taylor is a legit starter in the league. Would I have been surprised if the Vikes passed on AP? Absolutely not. Taylor played fantastically the year before and considering the previous year they drafted Williamson, I wouldn't put anything past the Vikes during the draft. Say what you will, but Taylor arguably the best backup in the league and could start for a good number of teams in the league. |
|
05-10-2009, 01:16 AM | #57 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|