LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-09-2009, 11:19 PM   #41
Barbshowers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
360
Senior Member
Default


That's what I think of your comment.
couldn't get the super bowl one? lame.
Barbshowers is offline


Old 04-09-2009, 11:21 PM   #42
Ggskbpbz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
And you'd be the only Eagles fan. Just ask Moses. He'll tell you how great McNabb is.

And since have you seen me waiving the Eli flag?
i believe there was a thread where you were bitching about how eagles fans think very little of eli.
Ggskbpbz is offline


Old 04-09-2009, 11:24 PM   #43
Zptmsemk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
I've never understood the big to do over that. All it shows me is he's leaving it all out on the field. Conditioning issue? I don't think so.
it's easy to find fault. it's not like the guy played his entire high school, collegiate, and professional career in predominantly cold weather. 95 degrees and 100% humidity should be easy to overcome.
Zptmsemk is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 08:16 AM   #44
Mmzmptvk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
How are the Vikings #4?
Anytime the Vikes get into the red zone you don't think Favre's gonna wanna throw????

Peterson's gonna lose some stats because of that. At least with TJack they knew they could just hand it off and count on AP to get the ball in.
Mmzmptvk is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 08:25 AM   #45
iodillalm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
i believe there was a thread where you were bitching about how eagles fans think very little of eli.
Right and swayed Moses and several others of your ilk into putting Eli in your top 10 QBs in the league.

What I mean by not waiving the Eli flag is that I won't sit here and tell you he's an elite QB or that he is better than McNabb, but he isn't nearly bad as people say he is. Numbers don't tell the whole story. This season should tell us a lot about Eli. He has his money, but no Plax.
iodillalm is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 10:28 AM   #46
ProomoSam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
Right and swayed Moses and several others of your ilk into putting Eli in your top 10 QBs in the league.

What I mean by not waiving the Eli flag is that I won't sit here and tell you he's an elite QB or that he is better than McNabb, but he isn't nearly bad as people say he is. Numbers don't tell the whole story. This season should tell us a lot about Eli. He has his money, but no Plax.
I don't think I ever put Eli in my top 10.
ProomoSam is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 05:44 PM   #47
bypeTeenehalT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
I don't think I ever put Eli in my top 10.
Maybe you didn't. But youre still a ¿¿¿¿.

I'm too hung over to debate.
bypeTeenehalT is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 06:17 PM   #48
Zwnkkvle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Taylor is a legit starter? This is news to me.
You aren't paying attention if you don't think Chester Taylor is a legit starter.
Zwnkkvle is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 06:21 PM   #49
Alice_Medichi34

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
606
Senior Member
Default
You aren't paying attention if you don't think Chester Taylor is a legit starter.
No, no, I have been. A thousand yard season 3 years ago doesn't qualify someone as a "legit" starter. I think it has to do with Viking fans on S-B are homers.
Alice_Medichi34 is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 06:47 PM   #50
Breilopmil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
No, no, I have been. A thousand yard season 3 years ago doesn't qualify someone as a "legit" starter. I think it has to do with Viking fans on S-B are homers.
So says the guy stating a trio of RB's that includes a guy with 500 career rushing yards and a guy with a handful of carries in the NFL after a couple seasons.

Taylor would have 3 consecutive very good seasons if it weren't for AP.

And you can be ridiculous and say if he were good the Vikes wouldn't have drafted AP, but AP is the type of player you don't pass on in the draft.

Similar to when the Vikes had one of the best receiving duos in the league and still drafted Randy Moss.
Breilopmil is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 07:27 PM   #51
SkeniaInhilla

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
So says the guy stating a trio of RB's that includes a guy with 500 career rushing yards and a guy with a handful of carries in the NFL after a couple seasons.
Yes, so says the guy with a trio of RBs running behind the best OL in the NFL on the team with one the best run games in football last year. I didn't say they where they should be ranked or make some bogus claim... like Chester Taylor is a legit starter in the league.

Taylor would have 3 consecutive very good seasons if it weren't for AP.
Oh, well, that settles it. Taylor would have had 3 good seasons. How stupid of me. So do 'would have seasons' get added to his stats? Or does Taylor just go straight to Canton?

And you can be ridiculous and say if he were good the Vikes wouldn't have drafted AP, but AP is the type of player you don't pass on in the draft.
Six other teams passed on him. Obviously a smart decision on the Vikes part, but considering AD's injury history and Chester 'Jim Brown resurrected' Taylor, would it have surprised you if the Vikes had passed on him?

Similar to when the Vikes had one of the best receiving duos in the league and still drafted Randy Moss.
Who a 10 year vet (Carter) and Robert Tate? Moss fell to the Vikes, like the AD selection, their wasn't much strategy involved in that pick.
SkeniaInhilla is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 07:34 PM   #52
gugqgbyzlp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Who a 10 year vet (Carter) and Robert Tate? Moss fell to the Vikes, like the AD selection, their wasn't much strategy involved in that pick.
The Vikings had Cris Carter, someone who became arguably one of the best receivers in NFL history, as well as Jake Reed, who prior to Moss being drafted, only had five consecutive thousand yard receiving seasons.

I guess you make a good point though. I can see why, after your receiving tandem sets an NFL record for consecutive thousand yard seasons as a tandem, you'd think that those receivers aren't very good.

For what it's worth, at the time, Tate was somewhere around 4th/5th receiver on the squad.
gugqgbyzlp is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 07:40 PM   #53
GenrieAB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default
The Vikings had Cris Carter, someone who became arguably one of the best receivers in NFL history, as well as Jake Reed, who prior to Moss being drafted, only had five consecutive thousand yard receiving seasons.

I guess you make a good point though. I can see why, after your receiving tandem sets an NFL record for consecutive thousand yard seasons as a tandem, you'd think that those receivers aren't very good.

For what it's worth, at the time, Tate was somewhere around 4th/5th receiver on the squad.
WRs so good, they didn't see the need to make the playoffs.

And I forgot all about Jake Reed. Tate just seemed like he was around forever.
GenrieAB is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 07:44 PM   #54
jacknates

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
WRs so good, they didn't see the need to make the playoffs.

And I forgot all about Jake Reed. Tate just seemed like he was around forever.
Correct you are.

Especially since the Vikings made the playoffs 5 of 6 years between 92-97... Including a 1997 wild card game where the Vikings, down 13-22 with 90 seconds left, beat the Giants 23-22.

I can see where you'd come up with the insinuation that the Vikings weren't making the playoffs. Must've slipped my mind.
jacknates is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 08:00 PM   #55
meencegic

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
Correct you are.

Especially since the Vikings made the playoffs 5 of 6 years between 92-97... Including a 1997 wild card game where the Vikings, down 13-22 with 90 seconds left, beat the Giants 23-22.

I can see where you'd come up with the insinuation that the Vikings weren't making the playoffs. Must've slipped my mind.
Hmm my bad. I didn't bother to look up the Vikes playoff appearances in the 90s since they were pretty forgettable outside of their 15-1 season. Do you remember how that one ended?

Either way, Chester Taylor is not a legit starter.
meencegic is offline


Old 05-09-2009, 08:18 PM   #56
drexigordiche

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Yes, so says the guy with a trio of RBs running behind the best OL in the NFL on the team with one the best run games in football last year. I didn't say they where they should be ranked or make some bogus claim... like Chester Taylor is a legit starter in the league.



Oh, well, that settles it. Taylor would have had 3 good seasons. How stupid of me. So do 'would have seasons' get added to his stats? Or does Taylor just go straight to Canton?



Six other teams passed on him. Obviously a smart decision on the Vikes part, but considering AD's injury history and Chester 'Jim Brown resurrected' Taylor, would it have surprised you if the Vikes had passed on him?



Who a 10 year vet (Carter) and Robert Tate? Moss fell to the Vikes, like the AD selection, their wasn't much strategy involved in that pick.
Jim Brown resurrected? I'd compare him more to Emmitt Smith. That's quite a fucking leap you are making from the claim he is a legit starter to Jim Brown.

Would I have been surprised if the Vikes passed on AP? Absolutely not. Taylor played fantastically the year before and considering the previous year they drafted Williamson, I wouldn't put anything past the Vikes during the draft.

Say what you will, but Taylor arguably the best backup in the league and could start for a good number of teams in the league.
drexigordiche is offline


Old 05-10-2009, 01:16 AM   #57
blackjackblax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Say what you will, but Taylor arguably the best backup in the league and could start for a good number of teams in the league.
Taylor is a fine backup, not best. But legit starter he is not.
blackjackblax is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity