LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-11-2008, 08:21 PM   #1
LxtdK9i4

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Hall no longer Part of a "Duo". Unless you conisder him and his agent.


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3684396
LxtdK9i4 is offline


Old 05-11-2008, 08:27 PM   #2
ovH9wfSJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
Hall no longer Part of a "Duo". Unless you conisder him and his agent.


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3684396
Couldn't have happened to a cockier more overrated player....
ovH9wfSJ is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 09:47 PM   #3
heennaRaf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
504
Senior Member
Default Top 10 Duos
Brought to you by FOX
heennaRaf is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 11:17 PM   #4
adarmaSen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
Wow. That list fucking sucks.
adarmaSen is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 11:26 PM   #5
Illisezek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
I agree with number 2
Illisezek is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 11:54 PM   #6
fil_nurser

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
I don't see Troy Aikman and the towel boy on that list.



-zing-
fil_nurser is offline


Old 08-26-2008, 12:09 AM   #7
Aleksis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
I agree with number 2
Hall has his moments. He's been hidden in cover 2 his whole career. He sucked ass last year.

Even though he was right about the coach being an asshole. Pointing it out wasn't necessary.
Aleksis is offline


Old 08-26-2008, 12:11 AM   #8
Arratherimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
What an aweful list. Where is Harrison and Wayne?
Arratherimi is offline


Old 08-26-2008, 06:08 PM   #9
entaifsfets

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
WTF was that?
entaifsfets is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:30 PM   #10
tiereenny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
391
Senior Member
Default
So do I.
First game they had together and had a horrible game plan....Looking great in there second game together....Gelling.
tiereenny is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:32 PM   #11
ViaxobbimeVar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
First game they had together and had a horrible game plan....Looking great in there second game together....Gelling.
Or maybe the Chiefs just blow.
ViaxobbimeVar is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:34 PM   #12
MaickiP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
641
Senior Member
Default
Or maybe the Chiefs just blow.
How come they almost beat the Patriots last week? There offense was rolling against the Patriots Starting Defense and had that guy got 5 more yards would have beat the Patriots. Raiders D is shutting them down in both running and passing.
MaickiP is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:39 PM   #13
gugamotina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
How come they almost beat the Patriots last week? There offense was rolling against the Patriots Starting Defense and had that guy got 5 more yards would have beat the Patriots. Raiders D is shutting them down in both running and passing.
Let's see. Well, first, Tom Brady got hurt making that a closer game than it would have been. Second, the Chiefs had Brodie Croyle and Damon Huard as their two quarterbacks. After Croyle got hurt, Huard came in, although Huard isn't great, did a good job.

Today, Croyle is out, and Huard got hurt after 4 passes. Tyler Thigpen had to come in, and when that didn't work the Chiefs brought in Marques Hagans to play QB. Hagans is a WR in the NFL. Now, you tell me if I should really put much into the Raiders shutting down the Chiefs' offense.

Stopping Larry Johnson is one thing (which became substantially easier with both Croyle and Huard out.) But stopping the pass is a completely different thing. Hall and Nnamdi would be the laughing stock of the league if they couldn't shut down the Chiefs' passing offense with Thigpen and Hagans at QB.
gugamotina is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:40 PM   #14
newshep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
How come they almost beat the Patriots last week? There offense was rolling against the Patriots Starting Defense and had that guy got 5 more yards would have beat the Patriots. Raiders D is shutting them down in both running and passing.
If shutting down the Chiefs 3rd string QB (note their first two suck as well) makes you feel better about the dynamic duo, then more power to you.
newshep is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:42 PM   #15
Redys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Let's see. Well, first, Tom Brady got hurt making that a closer game than it would have been. Second, the Chiefs had Brodie Croyle and Damon Huard as their two quarterbacks. After Croyle got hurt, Huard came in, although Huard isn't great, did a good job.

Today, Croyle is out, and Huard got hurt after 4 passes. Tyler Thigpen had to come in, and when that didn't work the Chiefs brought in Marques Hagans to play QB. Hagans is a WR in the NFL. Now, you tell me if I should really put much into the Raiders shutting down the Chiefs' offense.
ahh whatever a wins a win, and if the Raiders are so bad then the chiefs should be dominating them since everyone picked the Chiefs to win, I know its hard to admit the Raiders are playing 100 times better against the chiefs then they did against the Broncos, and the only real thing that has been horrible about the Raiders today is Russells passing.
Redys is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:43 PM   #16
Plokiikmol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
If shutting down the Chiefs 3rd string QB (note their first two suck as well) makes you feel better about the dynamic duo, then more power to you.
Thank you!
Plokiikmol is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:45 PM   #17
MilenaMKB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
570
Senior Member
Default
ahh whatever a wins a win, and if the Raiders are so bad then the chiefs should be dominating them since everyone picked the Chiefs to win, I know its hard to admit the Raiders are playing 100 times better against the chiefs then they did against the Broncos, and the only real thing that has been horrible about the Raiders today is Russells passing.
I'm not commenting on how good the Raiders are at all. McFadden is apparently having a hell of a game and the team certainly looks better than they did against the Broncos.

What I'm saying is that Hall and Nnamdi have not proven themselves at all yet. They got destroyed by the Broncos' passing attack and have shut down the Chiefs 3rd string and emergency QBs. The Raiders are doing what they have to do to win. That's fine. It doesn't mean that Hall and Nnamdi have "gelled" or that they're going to be able to stop an actual passing attack.
MilenaMKB is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:47 PM   #18
diemeareendup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
I'm not commenting on how good the Raiders are at all. McFadden is apparently having a hell of a game and the team certainly looks better than they did against the Broncos.

What I'm saying is that Hall and Nnamdi have not proven themselves at all yet. They got destroyed by the Broncos' passing attack and have shut down the Chiefs 3rd string and emergency QBs. The Raiders are doing what they have to do to win. That's fine. It doesn't mean that Hall and Nnamdi have "gelled" or that they're going to be able to stop an actual passing attack.
I said they are doing better and they have only 2 games with each other so far and they are Gelling not gelled already they are gelling.
diemeareendup is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 08:49 PM   #19
Agrisalia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
I said they are doing better and they have only 2 games with each other so far and they are Gelling not gelled already they are gelling.
We'll see. It certainly doesn't hurt shutting down the Chiefs. I'm just saying it doesn't really provide any evidence of improvement. It'll be interesting to see how they do next week. Buffalo looks good.
Agrisalia is offline


Old 09-14-2008, 09:46 PM   #20
TeftyJokip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
358
Senior Member
Default
We'll see. It certainly doesn't hurt shutting down the Chiefs. I'm just saying it doesn't really provide any evidence of improvement. It'll be interesting to see how they do next week. Buffalo looks good.
Yea, I wasn't trying to say they are set yet, just getting better and today was huge for them, the defense looked good, even if it was against the Chiefs....Buffalo does look good too, coming out of no where.
TeftyJokip is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:17 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity