Reply to Thread New Thread |
06-01-2008, 05:27 PM | #21 |
|
In a perfect world, they would look at each team, decide on 32 MVPs from each team, based on how much effect that persons play, has on their team. The player that has the greatest impact on thier team should be its MVP. Likewise, if your team stinks but you're the "MVP" of your team, are you truly the 32nd most valuable guy in the entire league? I mean that guy on the worst team in the league might not even be a Pro Bowler. |
|
06-01-2008, 05:46 PM | #22 |
|
Its a good idea on the surface, but the fact is on a team of 53 players, finding just one guy isn't always the easiest thing to do. Perhaps you have a stud on both sides of the ball. Also, there would likely be a number of guys in this format that receive no votes and in turn tying for last place in this thing. It really wouldn't be important as to who ended up in anything but first, so that really is a non-issue. This would end the current problem of teammates canceling eachother out. And if voters were honest in their vote this year, that SHOULD have actually come into play. |
|
06-01-2008, 10:28 PM | #25 |
|
|
|
06-01-2008, 11:00 PM | #26 |
|
|
|
06-01-2008, 11:01 PM | #27 |
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 12:32 PM | #29 |
|
Its probably the Journal Sentinal guy. ...Frank Cooney, according to the Associated Press. His vote kept the NFL MVP award from being unanimous for New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, who got 49 of the 50 votes from a nationwide panel. Cooney is the founder and publisher of the SportsXchange, an information provider for news organizations |
|
07-01-2008, 05:05 PM | #30 |
|
Nope. The sole vote for #4 was from . . . |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|