Which Runningback do you take? - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**PapsEdisa** · 09-20-2007, 02:52 AM

As an experiment on the white/black running back issue:

Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs.

Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs.

Who do you take?

**Anaerbguagree** · 09-20-2007, 03:04 AM

As an experiment on the white/black running back issue:

Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs.

Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs.

Who do you take?

how big are they, what kind of offense did the play in, can they catch out of the backfield?

**Vodonaeva** · 09-20-2007, 03:05 AM

Running back number 1. But they're both rather slow.

**ionitiesk** · 09-20-2007, 03:06 AM

As an experiment on the white/black running back issue:

Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs.

Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs.

Who do you take?

Height, weight count?

Not a white guy because he would get criticized more.

**Salliter** · 09-20-2007, 03:07 AM

Both come from a power running game, neither are known for pass catching

Runningback 1 is 6' 245 lbs.

Runningback 2 is 5'8" 199 lbs.

**myspacecoo** · 09-20-2007, 03:09 AM

Both come from a power running game, neither are known for pass catching

Runningback 1 is 6' 245 lbs.

Runningback 2 is 5'8" 199 lbs.

i wouldn't want either.

**HilaryNidierer** · 09-20-2007, 03:12 AM

Running back 1: 20 reps of 225 pounds

Running back 2: 24 reps of 225 pounds

**Ehlgamxf** · 09-20-2007, 03:15 AM

i wouldn't want either.

And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round.

**Trotoleterm** · 09-20-2007, 03:17 AM

And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round.

It's highly likely that RB number 1 is overrated.

**valiumnopresc** · 09-20-2007, 03:19 AM

And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round.

they both seem to be overweight.

**JakilSong** · 09-20-2007, 03:21 AM

And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round.

Because he's a better player, and everyone can see it.

**Cabinanteerip** · 09-20-2007, 03:29 AM

Running back 1:

Running back 2:

09-20-2007, 02:52 AM	#1
PapsEdisa Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 545 Senior Member	Which Runningback do you take? As an experiment on the white/black running back issue: Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs. Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs. Who do you take? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:04 AM	#2
Anaerbguagree Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 393 Senior Member	As an experiment on the white/black running back issue: Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs. Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs. Who do you take? how big are they, what kind of offense did the play in, can they catch out of the backfield? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:05 AM	#3
Vodonaeva Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 453 Senior Member	Running back number 1. But they're both rather slow. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:06 AM	#4
ionitiesk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 438 Senior Member	As an experiment on the white/black running back issue: Running Back #1: 4.60 40, comes from a major college program rushing for 3,256 yards and 36 TDs. Running Back #2: 4.55 40, small school prospect, 4,129 yards rushing and 32 TDs. Who do you take? Height, weight count? Not a white guy because he would get criticized more. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:07 AM	#5
Salliter Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	Both come from a power running game, neither are known for pass catching Runningback 1 is 6' 245 lbs. Runningback 2 is 5'8" 199 lbs. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:09 AM	#6
myspacecoo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 566 Senior Member	Both come from a power running game, neither are known for pass catching Runningback 1 is 6' 245 lbs. Runningback 2 is 5'8" 199 lbs. i wouldn't want either. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:12 AM	#7
HilaryNidierer Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 424 Senior Member	Running back 1: 20 reps of 225 pounds Running back 2: 24 reps of 225 pounds Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:15 AM	#8
Ehlgamxf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 436 Senior Member	i wouldn't want either. And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:17 AM	#9
Trotoleterm Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 415 Senior Member	And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round. It's highly likely that RB number 1 is overrated. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:19 AM	#10
valiumnopresc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round. they both seem to be overweight. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:21 AM	#11
JakilSong Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 468 Senior Member	And yet, the black running back was taken in the 1st round. Because he's a better player, and everyone can see it. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-20-2007, 03:29 AM	#12
Cabinanteerip Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	Running back 1: Running back 2: Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)