Reply to Thread New Thread |
09-21-2006, 04:57 PM | #21 |
|
|
|
09-21-2006, 04:59 PM | #22 |
|
Minnesota. They have barely beat two 0-2 teams. Without Longwell and a dumbass play by Gamble, they would have lost to Carolina. As you guys have said Seattle does belong there too though, barely beating Detroit is inexcusable. NYG vs. Seattle Atlanta vs. NO Chicago vs. Minny The above games will be very interesting. |
|
09-21-2006, 04:59 PM | #23 |
|
If New Orleans wants to surprise me, stop Vick and Dunn and beat the Falcons. However, a victory for the Saints would be a great omen for the charter game at the refurbished Dome. |
|
09-21-2006, 05:02 PM | #24 |
|
|
|
09-21-2006, 05:04 PM | #25 |
|
Minnesota. They have barely beat two 0-2 teams. Without Longwell and a dumbass play by Gamble, they would have lost to Carolina. As you guys have said Seattle does belong there too though, barely beating Detroit is inexcusable. |
|
09-21-2006, 07:18 PM | #26 |
|
I agree with what has been said about Seattle. Hard to argue against being the disappointment among the 2-0 teams. We should be playing much better but the offense usually starts out slow. Just goes to show that our defense is much improved and winning games for us now. Imagine how good the Seahawks will be when the offense gets into it's rhythm and is scoring 28+ points. Plus the O-Line should be better with Chris Spencer at LG instead of Pork Chop. And now Deion Branch getting activated.
I can't wait for Sunday's game against the Vagiants. It is going to be loud. Here's to a great game and a Seahawks WIN, 3-0! |
|
09-21-2006, 07:28 PM | #28 |
|
|
|
09-21-2006, 07:30 PM | #29 |
|
I agree with what has been said about Seattle. Hard to argue against being the disappointment among the 2-0 teams. We should be playing much better but the offense usually starts out slow. Just goes to show that our defense is much improved and winning games for us now. Imagine how good the Seahawks will be when the offense gets into it's rhythm and is scoring 28+ points. Plus the O-Line should be better with Chris Spencer at LG instead of Pork Chop. And now Deion Branch getting activated. Also, referring to the guy as Pork Chop isn't going to make anyone here think it means he's a good lineman, moreso that he's probably fat. |
|
09-21-2006, 07:49 PM | #30 |
|
Weren't you saying Pork Chop was just as good as Hutchinson before the season started? Pork Chop is his nick name, it is what the Seahawk fans call him. It is not a term to intimidate or fool people into believing he is the greatest O-Lineman ever. |
|
09-22-2006, 12:37 AM | #31 |
|
I dont think I said that at all. I thought Pork Chop would be a serviceable replacement but there is a drop off. And after the Lions game I said the O-Line is fine and the only hole was Pork Chop as he is the only difference from last year. Chop just cant stay healthy enough to stay in the lineup to get better and build continuity. |
|
09-22-2006, 01:17 AM | #32 |
|
|
|
09-25-2006, 09:30 PM | #33 |
|
So in the end, I called this pretty close. My only mistake was calling Houston to beat Washington.
Current 0-3 teams (week 4 opponent in parenthesis): Houston (Miami) Tennessee (Dallas) Detroit (@ St Louis) Cleveland (@ Oakland) Tampa Bay (BYE) 0-2 Teams that could still go 0-3: Oakland (Cleveland) Kansas City (SF) My Prediction: Look for all of these teams to remain winless except Cleveland and Kansas City. Cleveland, IMO, should have beat Baltimore. I expect them to rock Oakland. Kansas City shouldn't have too much trouble with SF. In other news, there's two "battle of the unbeatens" in week 4 that look to be exciting matchups. Look for Chicago to beat up Seattle and San Diego to have their way with Baltimore. |
|
09-25-2006, 10:06 PM | #34 |
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 01:17 AM | #35 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|