LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-21-2006, 04:57 PM   #21
Immerymopay

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
Home game wins within a division, IMO, should not be too surprising.
But it's the Saints.
Immerymopay is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 04:59 PM   #22
Druspills

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
353
Senior Member
Default
Minnesota. They have barely beat two 0-2 teams. Without Longwell and a dumbass play by Gamble, they would have lost to Carolina. As you guys have said Seattle does belong there too though, barely beating Detroit is inexcusable.
Which is why NYG at Seattle is one of my most intriguing 2-0 mathcups of week 3.

NYG vs. Seattle
Atlanta vs. NO
Chicago vs. Minny

The above games will be very interesting.
Druspills is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 04:59 PM   #23
Colorostikse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
If New Orleans wants to surprise me, stop Vick and Dunn and beat the Falcons.

Then they'd be my pick for most surprising 3-0 team.
I think the Saints are going down Monday unless the local crowd can brew up some special vodoo.

However, a victory for the Saints would be a great omen for the charter game at the refurbished Dome.
Colorostikse is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 05:02 PM   #24
CealialactBek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
But it's the Saints.
this one is a different situation. First home game in 2 years (or so). Reopening the Superdome. First game in NO since Katrina. Saints tickets are completely sold out for the season. It's just your everyday home game.
CealialactBek is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 05:04 PM   #25
itaspCatCriny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Minnesota. They have barely beat two 0-2 teams. Without Longwell and a dumbass play by Gamble, they would have lost to Carolina. As you guys have said Seattle does belong there too though, barely beating Detroit is inexcusable.
And in retrospect really would have lost if Detroit didn't beat itself. I mean theys should have put up 40+ points from what I hear.
itaspCatCriny is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:18 PM   #26
ketNavatutt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
I agree with what has been said about Seattle. Hard to argue against being the disappointment among the 2-0 teams. We should be playing much better but the offense usually starts out slow. Just goes to show that our defense is much improved and winning games for us now. Imagine how good the Seahawks will be when the offense gets into it's rhythm and is scoring 28+ points. Plus the O-Line should be better with Chris Spencer at LG instead of Pork Chop. And now Deion Branch getting activated.

I can't wait for Sunday's game against the Vagiants. It is going to be loud. Here's to a great game and a Seahawks WIN, 3-0!
ketNavatutt is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:26 PM   #27
JJascaxal

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
The falcons are going to crush the saints on monday. I can't see that being a close game.

NY vs Seattle and the bears/vikings game should be entertaining though.
JJascaxal is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:28 PM   #28
Cigarsstoreonline

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
336
Senior Member
Default
This is definitely a good week of matchups.
Cigarsstoreonline is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:30 PM   #29
GrottereewNus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
I agree with what has been said about Seattle. Hard to argue against being the disappointment among the 2-0 teams. We should be playing much better but the offense usually starts out slow. Just goes to show that our defense is much improved and winning games for us now. Imagine how good the Seahawks will be when the offense gets into it's rhythm and is scoring 28+ points. Plus the O-Line should be better with Chris Spencer at LG instead of Pork Chop. And now Deion Branch getting activated.

I can't wait for Sunday's game against the Vagiants. It is going to be loud. Here's to a great game and a Seahawks WIN, 3-0!
Weren't you saying Pork Chop was just as good as Hutchinson before the season started?

Also, referring to the guy as Pork Chop isn't going to make anyone here think it means he's a good lineman, moreso that he's probably fat.
GrottereewNus is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:49 PM   #30
unmalryAlalry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Weren't you saying Pork Chop was just as good as Hutchinson before the season started?

Also, referring to the guy as Pork Chop isn't going to make anyone here think it means he's a good lineman, moreso that he's probably fat.
I dont think I said that at all. I thought Pork Chop would be a serviceable replacement but there is a drop off. And after the Lions game I said the O-Line is fine and the only hole was Pork Chop as he is the only difference from last year. Chop just cant stay healthy enough to stay in the lineup to get better and build continuity.

Pork Chop is his nick name, it is what the Seahawk fans call him. It is not a term to intimidate or fool people into believing he is the greatest O-Lineman ever.
unmalryAlalry is offline


Old 09-22-2006, 12:37 AM   #31
PriernPayorse

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
I dont think I said that at all. I thought Pork Chop would be a serviceable replacement but there is a drop off. And after the Lions game I said the O-Line is fine and the only hole was Pork Chop as he is the only difference from last year. Chop just cant stay healthy enough to stay in the lineup to get better and build continuity.

Pork Chop is his nick name, it is what the Seahawk fans call him. It is not a term to intimidate or fool people into believing he is the greatest O-Lineman ever.
I think Pork Chop is a cool nickname.
PriernPayorse is offline


Old 09-22-2006, 01:17 AM   #32
VotsUtegems

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, I believe it is one he has had for a long time. I think is mother gave it to him as a child. He even signed my football as Pork Chop.
VotsUtegems is offline


Old 09-25-2006, 09:30 PM   #33
VZF74G0M

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
So in the end, I called this pretty close. My only mistake was calling Houston to beat Washington.

Current 0-3 teams (week 4 opponent in parenthesis):

Houston (Miami)
Tennessee (Dallas)
Detroit (@ St Louis)
Cleveland (@ Oakland)
Tampa Bay (BYE)

0-2 Teams that could still go 0-3:

Oakland (Cleveland)
Kansas City (SF)

My Prediction:

Look for all of these teams to remain winless except Cleveland and Kansas City. Cleveland, IMO, should have beat Baltimore. I expect them to rock Oakland. Kansas City shouldn't have too much trouble with SF.


In other news, there's two "battle of the unbeatens" in week 4 that look to be exciting matchups. Look for Chicago to beat up Seattle and San Diego to have their way with Baltimore.
VZF74G0M is offline


Old 09-25-2006, 10:06 PM   #34
UlceskLialels

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
369
Senior Member
Default
In other news, there's two "battle of the unbeatens" in week 4 that look to be exciting matchups. Look for Chicago to beat up Seattle
I am interested in your reasoning behind this opinion.
UlceskLialels is offline


Old 09-26-2006, 01:17 AM   #35
Essefsbyday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
I really thought Washington would be 3-0 by now, not 1-2. They were the most surprising 0-2 team, imo.
Essefsbyday is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity